I live in a country where un-armed minorities are often killed by police. These same police have newsletters (i.e. social media) that are published by the local police union. These newsletters are "radicalizing" their officers. The publishers have become advocates of crime against un-armed civilians and thus should have any immunity stripped from them.
Does anyone think that 1-800-LAW-FIRM might represent me?
In future children's civics class, they should teach that children need not masturbate upon orders from police officers...especially if one of the officers wants to take pictures...and even more so if any of the officers has a hard-on. And if your civics class is being taught by Judge Jan Roltsch-Anoll, tell her to wank off.
"Producing the number would... potentially violate Americans’ privacy in the process, Brooker said..."
Parsing this leads to two possibilities: 1) The NSA is seriously concerned about their practices in regard to privacy or 2) they are so maxed out with violating citizens' privacy's that they simply can't violate any more at this time.
This all sounds so, so familiar. Like way back in the 1950's when preachers and school principals were predicting doom and gloom because comic books "...ARE ADDICTIVE, HARMFUL, AND DANGEROUS IN THE HANDS OF CHILDREN."
Just imagine the outcry when Dr Farnum discovers that 12-year-olds can read comic books on their smartphones! And do you know what that leads to? Porn!
Sessions replied. “... It’s almost as if people think they have a right to violate the law..." Or that citizens have a right to find out just who in the administration is lying to them and how often.
Somewhere in the USA, corporate lobbyists are gathering and secretly making plans to criminalize non-tariff barrier activities. Which will lead to the following warning: Use a tit, go to jail. It's the law!
When a government agent prevents a senior citizen from changing out of urine-soaked underwear (after causing her to pee in them), you have to wonder: "Where did he get his training?"
Then it comes to you: at United Airlines.
(The proceeding message was brought to you by United...the "FUCK YOU" airline.)
On the post: Unintended Consequences Of EU's New Internet Privacy Rules: Facebook Won't Use AI To Catch Suicidal Users
A New GDPR Right
On the post: After The 'Octopus Incident' White House Threatened To Stop 'Menacing Logos' From Spy Satellites
What does that logo say?
Hey injuns! Guess who owns your land now?!?
On the post: Court Tosses Cop's Attempt To Sue Twitter And Facebook For Someone Killing Cops In Texas
Might 1-800-LAW-FIRM represent me.
Does anyone think that 1-800-LAW-FIRM might represent me?
On the post: Appeals Court: Forcing A Teen To Masturbate So Cops Can Take Pictures Is A Clear Violation Of Rights
Children's civics class
On the post: Verizon Begins Throttling Wireless Users, Effectively Bans 4K Streaming
Verizon: "Beyond Unlimited:"
Does anyone else see the similarity?
On the post: Psychiatrist Files Lawsuit Over Wordless One-Star Review
Reality?
On the post: There Is An Easy Answer To Whether Machines Should Get Copyright Rights And It Comes Down To Copyright's Purpose
RE: Similar to the monkey selfie
Because once AI's are granted these rights, then surely monkeys will be demanding them next.
After that...invertebrates?
On the post: NSA Continues To Dodge 'Incidental Collection' Question, Wants Its 'About' Surveillance Program Back
NSA violating privacy
Parsing this leads to two possibilities:
1) The NSA is seriously concerned about their practices in regard to privacy or
2) they are so maxed out with violating citizens' privacy's that they simply can't violate any more at this time.
I wonder which one it is.
On the post: Colorado Voters Will Get A Chance To Prevent Preteens From Using Smartphones
We've heard this before...
Just imagine the outcry when Dr Farnum discovers that 12-year-olds can read comic books on their smartphones! And do you know what that leads to? Porn!
On the post: DOJ Officials Express An Interest In Prosecuting Leakers And Whistleblowers
We the people
On the post: Comcast Under Fire For Using Bullshit Fees To Covertly Raise Rates
Croissants from Comcast
25 cents* lifetime cost guaranteed! Only 25 cents!*
*(some additionally self-imposed non-regulatory mandated fees may be applied including, but not limited to, the following: yeast activation fee, water purification charge, sugar importation offset, flour grinding expense, butter purity / bovine inspection costs, oven operation surcharge, poison control expense, profit margin protection offset, Property Tax adjustment, billing information verification fee, politician payoffs, et cetera ad infinitum)
Final cost is copyrighted and is not available until after payment.
[daily croissant consumption limit may be imposed/changed without prior notification]
On the post: Want To Promote Breastfeeding? That's A Trade Barrier, Says US Trade Rep
Criminalizing non-tariff barrier activities?
Use a tit, go to jail. It's the law!
On the post: Court: No Immunity For Federal Agent Who Made Elderly Woman Stand In Urine-Soaked Pants For Two Hours While He Questioned Her
His training???
Then it comes to you: at United Airlines.
(The proceeding message was brought to you by United...the "FUCK YOU" airline.)
On the post: Legal Threat From Creator Of Wall St. Bull Statue Even More Full Of Bull Than Expected
That law firm...
Dewey, DuCrack and Howe.
On the post: No, You Can't Buy Congress's Internet Data, Or Anyone Else's
Shhhhhh ! ! !
Correct, but does Congress know that? Not likely! And the thought of THEIR browser histories being sold might have caused them to reverse themselves.
Too late now, I suppose...
On the post: What Should We Add Next To The Techdirt Gear Store?
Math nerd t-shirt?
On the post: Apple Says Nebraska Will Become A 'Mecca For Hackers' If Right To Repair Bill Passes
phones and farm equipment
I predict that John Deere lobbyists will show up with pictures of severed fingers from when farmers tried to fix their own mowers.
On the post: Trump Campaign Wants To Trademark 'Keep America Great'
Great Again?
If phrase like this a "trademark-able", then doesn't that imply that Donald used Reagan's material, presumably without permission?
On the post: Dunks And Drunks: Jagermeister Blocks Milwaukee Bucks Logo Trademark Application
random comments
Unless the customer had a few beers and attempts to purchase the Milwaukee Bucks.
And later on..."both of whom converted to Christianity after experiencing a vision" Kick-ass beer will do that to you. No wonder college kids like it.
p.s. the video link is intended for viewers who are thinking of trying Jagermeister
On the post: One Fish Two Fish, We Will Sue Fish: Seuss Lawyers Hop On Pop Art
I wonder...
"Do you think they will sueus?"
Next >>