No the lawyer will only live 76yrs the remaining 2663.72yrs he spends waiting to go to trial due to the court system being backed up from intellectual properties cases.
The good thing there is that God wins all intellectual properties cases since he/she/it is all knowing so God must have thought of it first.
"Mike, is "more people waking up" a larger or smaller number than a "chorus"?"
Well one is an action so no number there as for being larger or smaller than a "chorus" we would need to know how many people are in the chorus and/or the space they take up.
"Imagine if there was a pharmacist or a doctor or just a friend who was telling people how to order drugs from overseas. That person would be aiding and abetting law breaking. Why is it any different if a server does it? Why isn't the programmer guilty of whatever instructions are given to the server?"
Lets take this a little further.
Why isn't the end users ISP guilty?
Why isn't the DNS guilty?
Why isn't the backbone guilty?
Why isn't the pharmacy guilty?
Why isn't the delivery service guilty?
Why isn't the ordering person guilty?
Why isn't the service that changed the US currency to Canadian guilty?
Re: Re: Re: Why focus on how "little" money he got?
"Infringement is selling the copyrighted works of others. That's alleged. All available info supports that, but of course we await trial. -- As for admissions, why did he take the (streams or) links down? ANY statement IS an admission (in a court case). Doesn't look good."
I did not know that he was SELLING the links to visitors. As for taking the links down as requested in a DMCA takedown notice it is required, so if it is an admission of guilt then it is a bit of a catch 22.
Re: Re: Re: Why focus on how "little" money he got?
What he found offensive I believe is what he finds as ignorance. Why I specify that it is him who feels this way is because I have yet to be offended by something in my life.
I agree about needing an extra button maybe a "???" would work.
It was a Brazillian company in Brazil they can order them to shut down the service from Brazil. If they cannot provide the service from Brazil they will have to move or could face sanctions from the countries court system for ignoring a direct court order.
If they lose and avoid payment next time the same patent comes up try to have the discovery process go further back to the holders. Use the evidence that went against the patent previously to get the money due. An alternative if that is not allowed after the first non-payment when a second judgment against it ask for damages and have a court ordered lean placed against the patent or for the patent be transferred over to the winning party as the initial payment.
Are you forgetting Hitler had Volkswagen created as a car "for the people" not to copy others and sue/bar the sale of other cars in other countries when they do the same.
So Prisoner 201 are you for the people or for limiting the peoples choice.
I do not know I like the iTard they are so fun to watch its like placing a blond in a round room and telling them they can only pee in the corner or they get shocked.
On the post: Accused Of Copyright Infringement For Reprinting Images Produced In 630 A.D.
Re: Re: Re: Day 3
The good thing there is that God wins all intellectual properties cases since he/she/it is all knowing so God must have thought of it first.
On the post: More People Waking Up To The Troubling Implications Of The Gov't Taking $500 Million From Google
Re:
Well one is an action so no number there as for being larger or smaller than a "chorus" we would need to know how many people are in the chorus and/or the space they take up.
On the post: More People Waking Up To The Troubling Implications Of The Gov't Taking $500 Million From Google
Re: You can't have your cake and eat it too
Lets take this a little further.
Why isn't the end users ISP guilty?
Why isn't the DNS guilty?
Why isn't the backbone guilty?
Why isn't the pharmacy guilty?
Why isn't the delivery service guilty?
Why isn't the ordering person guilty?
Why isn't the service that changed the US currency to Canadian guilty?
On the post: Rep. Conyers Wants To Clarify Termination Rights Under Copyright Law
Re: Re: Congressman's Error Explained
On the post: Don't Mess With Texas... Or, Well, Don't Use That Slogan As A Book Title Or Texas Will Sue
Re:
On the post: Jay-Z & Kanye Accused Of Infringement... On Album They Worked So Hard To Stop From Leaking
$$$
The asking price was to high what did he not offer to pay someone to take it off his hands.
On the post: ICE Arrests Another Person For Allowing Access To Streams From Elsewhere
Re: Re: Re: Why focus on how "little" money he got?
I did not know that he was SELLING the links to visitors. As for taking the links down as requested in a DMCA takedown notice it is required, so if it is an admission of guilt then it is a bit of a catch 22.
On the post: ICE Arrests Another Person For Allowing Access To Streams From Elsewhere
Re: Re: Re: Why focus on how "little" money he got?
I agree about needing an extra button maybe a "???" would work.
On the post: ICE Arrests Another Person For Allowing Access To Streams From Elsewhere
Re: Duh
On the post: US Court Tells Brazilian Court To Stop Ruling On Copyright Issue That It Wants To Rule On First
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Can You Beat Patent Trolls By Using The Same Techniques That Make Them So Successful?
Re: Judgment Proof
On the post: Paxfire Responds: Says It Doesn't Hijack Searches, Will Seek Sanctions Against Lawyers
Re: Re: Too fine of a line
My phone searches the numbers it has as I type one so yes that can be a search.
On the post: Disappointing: The Onion Tests A Paywall
Re:
On the post: New Missouri Law May Make It Illegal To Friend Your Former Teachers On Facebook
Re:
The real question is if the person is 18 but does not have the school listed or there age shared how can you be sure that it is ok.
On the post: New Missouri Law May Make It Illegal To Friend Your Former Teachers On Facebook
Re: Re: So,
On the post: Apple Continues To Scream To The World How Competitive Samsung's Tablet Is By Getting It Banned In Australia
Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 3rd, 2011 @ 3:33am
*Disclaimer - Turtleneck is only compatible with the iWasher and iDryCleaners, failure to comply results in spontaneous combustion.
On the post: Apple Continues To Scream To The World How Competitive Samsung's Tablet Is By Getting It Banned In Australia
Re:
So Prisoner 201 are you for the people or for limiting the peoples choice.
On the post: Amazon Stops Accepting Apps In Germany Due To Apple's App Store Trademark Claim
Re: Trademark
On the post: Amazon Stops Accepting Apps In Germany Due To Apple's App Store Trademark Claim
Re:
On the post: China Says 'Mission Accomplished' On Stopping Copyright Infringement
Re:
Next >>