It should be determined by what crime they looking at and what time frame.
ie
Prosecutor "The assault happened between 10:00 PM and 10:30 PM on this date xx/yy/zzzz"
Judge "you can review the retrieve the cell phone records for that time period"
The simple explanation is often the correct one. Since he was an IT admin he had access to the entire system he was administering, no real hacking required.
He mentioned his setup is more subtle than that. Which mean multiple file subsets, with multiple people (or programs) holding multiple keys, and a main file with all documents in case of his death. The files are probably already widely distributed.
This allows for different levels of disclosure based on disappearance, arrest, deportation, death, etc. His press conference was more than likely a proof of life event to prevent disclosure.
The problem with collecting all data on everyone is you end up with more false positives and false negatives. Making the system practically useless and a waste of time and money.
Due to Statistics they would need to increase investigative their staff a couple hundred fold to handle all the leads. It is far better to do actual police work.
So let me get this straight, people who hype the fluff the government wants the population to hear, on the nightly news, are journalist. And people who break real news stories about corruption, law breaking, and lies are not journalist.
There is something really wrong with this picture.
As Dan Ravicher speculated, the lawsuits are nothing more than trying to save face with investors, and stave off competition to eek out a few more dollars. Simple as that.
On the post: Two Key Cases Involving Gatekeepers Using Copyright To Try To Kill Disruptive Startups Come To Very Different Conclusions
Re: Re: ZZzzz... Huh? Oh. Mike working on his page rank again,
On the post: Judge: Aereo Case Was Decided Incorrectly, Because I Don't Like Previous Ruling
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Microsoft Fires Off Rebuttal To Latest Leak; Angry Letter To Eric Holder
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: 7 Months Of Warrantless 'Just Metadata' Paints A Clear Picture Of Your Personal Life
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: 7 Months Of Warrantless 'Just Metadata' Paints A Clear Picture Of Your Personal Life
Re: Re:
It should be determined by what crime they looking at and what time frame.
ie
Prosecutor "The assault happened between 10:00 PM and 10:30 PM on this date xx/yy/zzzz"
Judge "you can review the retrieve the cell phone records for that time period"
On the post: Ed Snowden Explains To Former Senator, Who Emailed In Support, That No Foreign Gov't Can Access His Documents
Re: Re: Security clearance
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/01/us/job-title-key-to-inner-access-held-by-snowden.html ?pagewanted=all&_r=0
On the post: Ed Snowden Explains To Former Senator, Who Emailed In Support, That No Foreign Gov't Can Access His Documents
Re: Re: Re: Amazing
This allows for different levels of disclosure based on disappearance, arrest, deportation, death, etc. His press conference was more than likely a proof of life event to prevent disclosure.
On the post: NJ Congressman Rush Holt Is Attempting To Repeal The Patriot Act And FISA Amendments Act
Re: Re: Physicist
On the post: Either The Solicitor General Lied To The Supreme Court, Or Senator Feinstein Lied To The Public About Warrantless Wiretapping
Re:
Due to Statistics they would need to increase investigative their staff a couple hundred fold to handle all the leads. It is far better to do actual police work.
On the post: DOJ's New 'Less Likely To Spy On Press' Rules Only Apply To Whoever DOJ Feels Is Really 'News Media'
There is something really wrong with this picture.
On the post: Myriad Mocks Supreme Court's Ruling On Gene Patents; Sues New Competitors Doing Breast Cancer Tests
On the post: The Latest Leaks Contradict Claims Made In Microsoft's Own 'Law Enforcement Requests Report'
Re: Re: In Microsoft's defense
On the post: The Latest Leaks Contradict Claims Made In Microsoft's Own 'Law Enforcement Requests Report'
Re: In Microsoft's defense
That is unless there is a secret interpretation of SEC regulations that the public isn't allowed to know about.
On the post: NSA Talking Points On Utah Data Center: We're Teaming Up With Tech Companies To 'Protect' The Internet
Re:
On the post: Snowden's Constitution vs Obama's Constitution
Re: Fourth Admendment
Didn't you get the memo? With all the laws the government has passed over the past 50 years, everyone commits 3 felonies a day.
On the post: California AG Pretends Copyright Infringement Is Theft; Charges Streaming Site With Grand Theft
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Intelligence Boss Claims The Real Villain Here Is The Press For Revealing His Secret Spying Program
Re: Re: Re: Re:
For those new to the internet a "link" is a URL ...
On the post: Intelligence Boss Claims The Real Villain Here Is The Press For Revealing His Secret Spying Program
Re: PRISM
On the post: Why Did Congress Abdicate Its Power To Make Copyright Policy?
Re: Re: And this is part of the reason why...
A half melted pudding pop ???
On the post: Senator Lindsey Graham Apparently Not Sure If Bloggers Deserve 'First Amendment Protection'
Re: Re:
Next >>