NSA Talking Points On Utah Data Center: We're Teaming Up With Tech Companies To 'Protect' The Internet
from the surveillance?-what-surveillance dept
Last year, well before all of the revelations concerning the NSA's surveillance program, reporter James Bamford, who has a long history of reporting on the NSA's questionable activities, revealed the details of the NSA's massive data center in Bluffdale, Utah, which it was building to host all of this information that it's been hoovering up for years. Michael Morisy, from Muckrock, used a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to get the media talking points that the NSA used upon the groundbreaking of the building. As reported in Bamford's piece, there had been a "public" groundbreaking, with press there, and Morisy wondered how the NSA framed the building's purpose when it first discussed it. And, the answer, it appears, was to play down anything having to do with the massive data collection.The talking points play up the fact that there's so much data online, but rather than talking about how the NSA is collecting all of it, they say that they're setting up this operation to help "protect" your data. From everyone... except the NSA, of course.
Notice, also, how when they do discuss looking outbound, rather than just "protecting" networks, they lump it all together:
- DISCUSS THE FOR TAKING NATIONAL ACTION TO THE CYBERSECURITY PROBLEMS WE FACE.
- US DEPENDENCE ON THE INTERNET PROBABLY GREATER THAN ANY OTHER NATION
- NOT JUST MEANS OF COMMUNICATIONS BUT DATA IS THERE As WELL -- FINANCIAL DATA, DATA
- CYBERSPACE CONTROLS OUR CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE -- BANKING, ENERGY, AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, UTILITIES
- THREAT IS GROWING -- INFRASTRUCTURE TARGETTED FOR AND POTENTIALLY FOR DISRUPTION OR DESTRUCTION BY GROWING NUMBER OF AND ACTORS
WE NEED TO USE OUR PARTNERSHIPS BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT TO INCREASE OUR KNOWLEDGE AND CAPABILITIES IN CYBERSPACE TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE THREAT, AND TO BETTER RESPON TO IT.Of course, they leave out that "the threat" is all of us in the public, and how to "better respon (sic) to it" is to collect all data everywhere.
Hell, they even go so far as to suggest that they're going out of their way, and beyond their mandate, just to "help out" all those tech companies they work with. Just to be helpful.
GOVERNMENT HAS NO LEGISLATED REQUIREMENT TO PROTECT THE DOT-COM NETWORKS. NONETHELESS, IT CANNOT BE ARGUED THAT THESE NETWORKS ARE CRITICAL TO THE DAY-TO-DAY FUNCTIONING AND OPERATING OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS GOVERNMENT, ITS BUSINESSES, AND ITS PEOPLE...Yeah. And by "helping" to "secure" those networks, we actually mean "partnering" with the telcos to snarf up every bit of data that crosses those networks for our own spying efforts. And they keep going on and on about the importance of these "partnerships."
WE WOULD BE REMISS, AS PUBLIC SERVANTS, IF WE DID NOT USE THE INFORMATION WE GAIN IN PROTECTING OUR DOT-MIL AND DOT-GOV NETWORKS TO HELP TO SECURE THE DOT-COM NETWORKS AS WELL.
WE CANNOT DO IT ALONE -- NOR IS IT IN OUR BEST INTERESTS TO TRY. JUST AS CYBERSPACE AFFECTS EVERY ASPECT OF OUR SOCIETY, SO TOO MUST OUR EFFORTS TO SECURE CYBERSPACE MOVE BEYOND GOVERNMENT TO INCLUDE THE PRIVATE SECTOR, ACADEMIA, AND OUR GLOBAL PARTNERS.And by "secure cyberspace," we mean "undermine the privacy of everyone" by collecting all their data. That's the part the NSA truly cannot "do alone."
I also love this one:
EMPHASIZE THAT NSA'S ROLE IN THIS IS NOT A 'MILITARIZATION' OF CYBERSPACE; TECHNICAL ADVISORY CAPACITY ONLY.A "technical advisory capacity only" that involves on-premise systems at every major telco, hoovering up every single bit of data that crosses those systems to store for future "analysis" inside the Bluffdale center? That's just a technical advisory capacity?
But, don't worry, it's all "legal."
UNDERSCORE THAT EVERYTHING NSA DOES IN CYBERSPACE IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH LAW AND REGULATION AND THAT WE ARE 100% COMMITTED TO PROTECTIN THE CIVIL LIBERTIES AND PRIVACY RIGHTS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.And by "in compliance with law and regulation," we mean after we convinced the FISA court to secretly reinterpret a law that those who wrote the law say is exactly how the law was not supposed to be interpreted. But we won't even discuss how we interpret the law publicly, because that's a national security issue.
AT NSA, OUR TOP THREE CORE VALUES ARE LAWFULNESS, HONESTY, AND INTEGRITY.And lying. Oh, so much lying. Did we mention the lying?
WE APPRECIATE THE WELCOME YOU HAVE GIVEN US.And we know you appreciate our presence, because, well, because we know.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cybersecurity, data center, nsa, nsa surveillance, talking points, utah
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So the message should be:
Dear GOVERNMENTS (including espionage agencies),
Please fuck off.
Best regards,
Everybody else
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So the message should be:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: IOW
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For example if your objective is world domination then it is only logical that you are doing it for the children even if it results in the death of millions (which is exactly what happened in Stalinist Russia and Maoist China).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Surely part of the "limited hangout" is to bore everyone,
Here's a far more important aspect (the site only one of several with same basis):
http://refreshingnews99.blogspot.in/2013/07/nsa-is-quietly-writing-code-for-googles.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Surely part of the "limited hangout" is to bore everyone,
Perhaps you should turn yourself in and pay up the statutory rates, huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Okay, so the NSA is adding to an OS product while Google asks for permission to disclose more information about what's going on.
NO ONE IS OBLIGED TO USE GOOGLE PRODUCTS.
Got it?
Probably not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So, which is more likely? That SELinux (with independent review) has a "sooper-sekrit" NSA back door, or that closed-source unreviewable OSes have them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fabulous. Then please stop f***ing with them.
Thank you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Are you allowed to protest in he USA? Or is it considered a "terrorist" action?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
What about protesting? They pass all the laws and no one contests them.
Look at the french, the government starts doing shit, they start protests, riots, burning cars (they actually over-do it a little) but they are able to push back laws that are bad for the people.
When you will people in the US open your eyes and see that to ahve democracy, sometimes the people has to go against the government?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The same is happening in the UK albeit more slowly.
The 'Arab Spring' demonstrations are the very kind of thing that need to be happening in the USA UK and other countries in Europe, but isn't because everyone just wants to be on Faecesbook Twatter and the like, the great Weapons of Mass Distraction, people just want to buy stuff, shopping is far more important.
It is to much trouble to protest or have a revolution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I give it around 5 years for the US to be recognized as such.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yeah, I'm sure that idea terrifies them.
I would rather have concrete justice in the here and now than theoretical justice in some supposed afterlife when it is worthless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So are they providing a backup service?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So are they providing a backup service?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No thank you...
We don't need you to "protect" our Internet (keyword: our). We're afraid how badly you'll screw it up.
------------
Why does it seem like these folks don't understand (at all) what they are trying to "protect"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Person of Interest
Advisors reminds me of how we were able to stay out of Viet Nam because we only had advisors not troops.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The NSA is missing a HUGE opportunity. ..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The NSA's Utah tech partner
To prevent data from your computer going to Omniture set a firewall rule to block incoming and outgoing traffic with the range 66.235.0.0/16
(For those who aren't familiar with CIDR format, this actually means everything from 66.235.0.1 - 66.235.255.255)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
STILL
is there any declaration of WHAT they are protecting it from?
Any idea HOW?
If they would Monitor and kill SPAM, I would like it.
If they would install Malware protection I would like it.
If they would track down all those BOT installations, I would like it.
Other wise its a bunch of people sitting around watching numbers scan across a screen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Petition to Shut down Utah NSA Data Center!
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/shut-down-nsas-12-billion-dollar-utah-data-center /RMk4DTXg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Petition to Shut down Utah NSA Data Center!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]