Nimmer – who also teaches at UCLA and is of counsel at Irell & Manella – told THR that he agrees with the decision, although he added that the facts of the case were “as squirrely as you could imagine.”
Is what it says. Sounds like a personal agreement with the ruling, but the last line indicates he's not sure if it agrees legally.
Did you RTFA? Specifically, there was a link about 4 words earlier about how some thought it good. If you'd clicked it, you'd have gone to a piece called "Hollywood Experts Divided on Implications of 'Muslims' Ruling"
In it, it cites a number of experts who thought it bad, therefore they're no longer 'anonymous' are they?
To help you out, I'll even list them. “It is a terrible ruling,” said UCLA School of Law professor Neil Netanel. “This is clearly an ends-driven opinion,” countered Davis Wright’s Alonzo Wickers, who represents content creators and distributors. University of Maryland law professor James Grimmelmann was blunt. “It’s amateur hour at the Ninth Circuit,” he said. James Janowitz, chair of the entertainment group at New York’s Pryor Cashman, said “sometimes people will twist themselves into a pretzel” to reach a desired decision. Janowitz represents production companies and networks.
That help any? A little less 'anonymous' now? And all you had to do was click the provided reference. Amazing.
You DO know that copyright/patent reform is only a SMALL part of the main pirate platform, right?
The platform is: * Government accountability/transparency * Increased Personal Privacy * Copyright/Patent/Trademark reform.
You'll also notice that's the order of the 3 sections in the book No Safe Harbor, put out by the USPP (and co-edited by me)
You'll notice a lot of the first two being talking about recently. The first vote against ACTA at the EU was led by a committee on a report written by Pirate MEP Amelia Andersdotter. Pirates: Fact-based politics.
Lutz isn't a lawyer, he's the officer of AF Holdings. They lost one case this week in Illinois. The Patel (that's the 'ignore California because Gay Marriage' and 'seal the case because the internet is mean') case has a hearing on Tuesday. Judge has said 'no affidavit's, unless they're here to be cross'd as well' and will be talking sanctions.
Nope, I know they'd LIKE that theory, but they have at least bowed to the realities.
Namely, while a land border is continuous and exterior, an air-border (ie, airport) is closed and interior. They already have and and all exits out of said area under control (because it's so small) and because to arrive in it, you'd need to do so in an easily recognizable aircraft.
A land border, however, is large, and has free and open access, and so anyone can arrive there at any time and at any point (in theory) without observation and direct control. Hence the Zone.
Now, I certainly don't agree with it, but it at least makes a 'kinda' sense - or at least as much as those Committee for State Security ever make.
Are you a lawyer, licensed in Ga? I'm just asking because you clearly know how to do legal research, and AF Holdings is now looking for a lawyer in the Patel case, since Nazaire has been forced to withdraw under 10USC. Might wanna give them a call.
That's NOTHING. You should check out 17 U.S. CODE § 501 I'll quote the very first bit to you.
(a) Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 122 or of the author as provided in section 106A (a), or who imports copies or phonorecords into the United States in violation of section 602, is an infringer of the copyright or right of the author, as the case may be.
You'll notice that it SPECIFICALLY refers to violating copyright, and defines details. It does not reference 18USC at all, for a very good reason, 18USC is inapplicable.
Of course, I'm all for striking 17USC501 and replacing it with 18usc.
BTW, that 2319 came from a lovely little lobby law produced under Bush, the ProIP act. So you can hardly say it's 'been deemed that for a century'.
Also, the SCOTUS doesn't consider it theft (see Dowling, Golan)
Here's a helpful little primer to help you understand the difference. I am told Pearson education actually bought a license to put it in one of their copyright textbooks.
We've been a bit twitchy about terrorist plotting - even for a laugh - since 7/7/2005.
Which is a bit sad, as it's hardly the first time we've had a terrorist incident. Just the first since the Cowards Parade took over. (Warrington Bombing survivor here)
the exception for naming the driver of a vehicle went to the european courts in ~98. they said you had no right to silence or protection from self-incrimination then.
Then RIPA came in, and they can demand the password for any crime, failure is 2 years. for terrorism its 5. So one of the first things people did when it passed, was commit a minor crime, write a file about it, then encrypted it and sent it to the Home Secretary (or maybe the deputy PM, I forget which) then told the police that politician had evidence of a crime. As you might expect, plod didn't really care, because of who it was (this was before plebegate) but it might be something people will try again.
On the post: Judge Kozinski Refuses To Even Consider That His Ruling To Censor 'Innocence Of Muslims' On Copyright Grounds May Go Too Far
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Nimmer – who also teaches at UCLA and is of counsel at Irell & Manella – told THR that he agrees with the decision, although he added that the facts of the case were “as squirrely as you could imagine.”
Is what it says. Sounds like a personal agreement with the ruling, but the last line indicates he's not sure if it agrees legally.
On the post: Judge Kozinski Refuses To Even Consider That His Ruling To Censor 'Innocence Of Muslims' On Copyright Grounds May Go Too Far
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Specifically, there was a link about 4 words earlier about how some thought it good. If you'd clicked it, you'd have gone to a piece called "Hollywood Experts Divided on Implications of 'Muslims' Ruling"
In it, it cites a number of experts who thought it bad, therefore they're no longer 'anonymous' are they?
To help you out, I'll even list them.
“It is a terrible ruling,” said UCLA School of Law professor Neil Netanel.
“This is clearly an ends-driven opinion,” countered Davis Wright’s Alonzo Wickers, who represents content creators and distributors.
University of Maryland law professor James Grimmelmann was blunt. “It’s amateur hour at the Ninth Circuit,” he said.
James Janowitz, chair of the entertainment group at New York’s Pryor Cashman, said “sometimes people will twist themselves into a pretzel” to reach a desired decision. Janowitz represents production companies and networks.
That help any? A little less 'anonymous' now? And all you had to do was click the provided reference.
Amazing.
On the post: Horrific Appeals Court Ruling Says Actress Has Copyright Interest In 'Innocence Of Muslims,' Orders YouTube To Delete Every Copy
Or is he looking to undermine the asinine pro-copyright rulings by going wicked-crazy-extreme, and daring the MPAA to argue back against it?
On the post: New Whistleblower Reveals NSA Picking Drone Targets Based On Bad Data: 'Death By Unreliable Metadata'
Taliban just needs to clone King's SIM, and THEN we'll see just how good he thinks the targeting is.
Of course, knowing him, even after being hit with a drone strike, he's unlikely to come out and apologize.
On the post: Congressional Candidates From Both Major Parties Find Opposing The NSA Is A Worthwhile Campaign Platform
Re:
On the post: Congressional Candidates From Both Major Parties Find Opposing The NSA Is A Worthwhile Campaign Platform
Re: Re:
The platform is:
* Government accountability/transparency
* Increased Personal Privacy
* Copyright/Patent/Trademark reform.
You'll also notice that's the order of the 3 sections in the book No Safe Harbor, put out by the USPP (and co-edited by me)
You'll notice a lot of the first two being talking about recently. The first vote against ACTA at the EU was led by a committee on a report written by Pirate MEP Amelia Andersdotter.
Pirates: Fact-based politics.
On the post: Congressional Candidates From Both Major Parties Find Opposing The NSA Is A Worthwhile Campaign Platform
And they said we were unelectable freetards...
On the post: ICE Takes To Twitter In Ridiculous Attempt To Defend Interrogating A Man In A Movie Theater For Wearing Google Glass
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: ICE Takes To Twitter In Ridiculous Attempt To Defend Interrogating A Man In A Movie Theater For Wearing Google Glass
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Namely, while a land border is continuous and exterior, an air-border (ie, airport) is closed and interior. They already have and and all exits out of said area under control (because it's so small) and because to arrive in it, you'd need to do so in an easily recognizable aircraft.
A land border, however, is large, and has free and open access, and so anyone can arrive there at any time and at any point (in theory) without observation and direct control. Hence the Zone.
Now, I certainly don't agree with it, but it at least makes a 'kinda' sense - or at least as much as those Committee for State Security ever make.
On the post: ICE Takes To Twitter In Ridiculous Attempt To Defend Interrogating A Man In A Movie Theater For Wearing Google Glass
Re:
I'm just asking because you clearly know how to do legal research, and AF Holdings is now looking for a lawyer in the Patel case, since Nazaire has been forced to withdraw under 10USC.
Might wanna give them a call.
On the post: ICE Takes To Twitter In Ridiculous Attempt To Defend Interrogating A Man In A Movie Theater For Wearing Google Glass
Re:
You forgot to mention Golan also established it's not property
On the post: ICE Takes To Twitter In Ridiculous Attempt To Defend Interrogating A Man In A Movie Theater For Wearing Google Glass
Re:
I'll quote the very first bit to you.
You'll notice that it SPECIFICALLY refers to violating copyright, and defines details.
It does not reference 18USC at all, for a very good reason, 18USC is inapplicable.
Of course, I'm all for striking 17USC501 and replacing it with 18usc.
BTW, that 2319 came from a lovely little lobby law produced under Bush, the ProIP act. So you can hardly say it's 'been deemed that for a century'.
Also, the SCOTUS doesn't consider it theft (see Dowling, Golan)
On the post: ICE Takes To Twitter In Ridiculous Attempt To Defend Interrogating A Man In A Movie Theater For Wearing Google Glass
I am told Pearson education actually bought a license to put it in one of their copyright textbooks.
http://torrentfreak.com/copyright-infringement-and-theft-%e2%80%93-the-difference-110827/
On the post: UK Man Jailed For Not Giving Police Thumbstick Password
Re: Re: Re:
Which is a bit sad, as it's hardly the first time we've had a terrorist incident. Just the first since the Cowards Parade took over. (Warrington Bombing survivor here)
On the post: UK Man Jailed For Not Giving Police Thumbstick Password
Re: Re:
Couldn't find a link myself, until I found a comment I'd made on Falkvinge's blog 18months ago with the link in it :-)
http://www.zdnet.com/surveillance-straw-petitioned-on-commerce-bill-controversy-3002073974/
On the post: Alabama Court Shuts Blogger Up With Prior Restraint Court Order, Indefinite Jailing For Contempt Of Court
Voting Rights Act.
Now it all kinda makes sense.
On the post: UK Man Jailed For Not Giving Police Thumbstick Password
Then RIPA came in, and they can demand the password for any crime, failure is 2 years. for terrorism its 5. So one of the first things people did when it passed, was commit a minor crime, write a file about it, then encrypted it and sent it to the Home Secretary (or maybe the deputy PM, I forget which) then told the police that politician had evidence of a crime.
As you might expect, plod didn't really care, because of who it was (this was before plebegate) but it might be something people will try again.
On the post: EU Commission Redefines Corporate Lobbyists As 'Civil Society' To Pretend To Be Transparent In TAFTA/TTIP
We look at it as meaning 'you can look through it'
They look at it as meaning 'you can't see it at all'
On the post: Latest Twist On DRM Of Physical Products: Machines Locked Down By Geolocation
Re: Re:
You certainly can, just its cheaper (in time and materials) to buy it in.
On the post: Latest Twist On DRM Of Physical Products: Machines Locked Down By Geolocation
Re:
Lets see how well they get stopped, eh?
Next >>