Congressional Candidates From Both Major Parties Find Opposing The NSA Is A Worthwhile Campaign Platform
from the it's-not-a-partisan-issue dept
People running for Congress this year, no matter what political party they're associated with have apparently found something they can agree on. It appears that both Republican and Democratic candidates are running on an anti-NSA platform. Of course, it's unclear how successful any of these campaigns will be, and whether or not those running, if elected, would actually do anything. It may just be a form of grandstanding, but at the very least it seems like a good sign. We've been pointing out that opposition to the NSA shouldn't be a a partisan issue at all, but one of doing what's right. Hopefully more politicians will realize this is the case, rather than worrying about whether this or that party supports the position.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: candidates, nsa, politics, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And they said we were unelectable freetards...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The platform is:
* Government accountability/transparency
* Increased Personal Privacy
* Copyright/Patent/Trademark reform.
You'll also notice that's the order of the 3 sections in the book No Safe Harbor, put out by the USPP (and co-edited by me)
You'll notice a lot of the first two being talking about recently. The first vote against ACTA at the EU was led by a committee on a report written by Pirate MEP Amelia Andersdotter.
Pirates: Fact-based politics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You know that middle-ground third party you've been looking for? Here they are!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well...
Integrity.
Honesty.
Pick 1.
Oh dear, I think I feel a political wind blowing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You can't expect them to vote according to the best interest of the political class. Fortunately, the U.S.A. has a buffering electoral system that makes sure that whatever people vote for, the actual choices are made by professional politicians paid for working to the best of their monetary interest.
While it is somewhat amusing to look at the "popular vote" after elections, those are not much more than a curiosity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hope
It's funny to watch you guys get played because you have the "issue of the week" on your side.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And hey I wonder if any votes will change after some of their secrets are mentioned by "lobbyists" for the corps doing the grunt work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I did what was right in a dark and sometimes twisted world. It was the only kind of hero I knew how to be. Does it get better? Does the light come in? Or do you know?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Action speaks louder than word.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Most of them dont give two fucks about these problems
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]