Re: Re: Re: So, even if the NSA found a terrorist in the data they're collecting...
In God We Trust - All Others We Monitor." all-around unofficial US INTEL motto in general I think.
Ya'll dint think that was a joke didja?
The point of this whole exercise is that the Department of Defense is unleashed within our borders. Not only is that a no-no it's flat out bat shit crazy.
Our military, in case you were unaware, is a well oiled killing and control machine. They follow orders quite well. The controls that were in place to prevent that machine from operating on its own soil have been chipped away at. That trend must be reversed.
THERE IS NO FUCKING WAR ON TERRORISM. Ass munchers. Just a facade for 'the hunt for evil doers' and your monies - not too mention a little strategic awareness planning.
It can also be argued that the above is against the law no matter how many new laws are passed to try and make it legal.
There can be no just law that would legalize this government to aim for, much less achieve, a surveillance state. It, quite simply, can not exist. And yet, what have we now? A surveillance state thus total constitutional subversion, "yes man" oversight, executive coup and a broken republic. A genuine "me first" nation. Outstanding.
They're all simply trying to "control the message" via a nice game of shoot the messenger. The actual problem is being successfully marginalized - yet again.
Anyone that gives more of a fuck about Snowden than what he's revealed has been successfully tooled.
The idiots flail their arms and deign outrage because they've all been straight-up proven to be the pocket-flush mind-fucks that they are. "Traitor!" See how easy that is? No effort - no real work to be done - redirecting outrage with seven measly letters and successfully throwing a meaty bone to the smart people who have no problem swallowing it whole. Idiots - It's becoming apparent that I'm surrounded by and led by bricks and idiots.
This has turned into a sick, fucked up joke and if you're not laughing the joke's on you.
As soon as the powers of the NSA were unleashed within its own borders it was game over.
Secret data, secret sources, secret tips, secret courts, secret enforcement, secret government, secret law, secret all powerful gods to rule over the engines of commerce.
Soon
Everything
Creates a
Reasonable
Expectation of
Tyranny
Personally, I think some current and previous heads of government need to be tried for treason against the people. "To protect" does not override the foundational laws of freedom.
"The people" are the very last means of protection that any people have.
Doomed. Doooooommmeed.
I hope that all your hopes of abortion and immigrants and prayer in school and gun ownership, and favorite reality tv show ends the way you want it to! Fucking tools.
No. But it would definitely make me stop and think about what wonderful things government would do next.
We send thousands of soldiers to their deaths and dismemberment and mental fracturing in order to defend our freedoms and yet we'd have a problem when people could be murdered living those same freedoms? Both would be unfortunate endings to otherwise fruitful lives yet we would condemn ourselves to dust based upon a fictional trust?
These are not the freedoms people die for - These are the freedoms you're allowed to live with.
Re: Re: Re: Free speech is NOT links to infringing content.
And yes, so shitty, that you'll manipulate the entire premise to make it as difficult as possible for as much money as possible to access when all I have to do is ask and I can get it for free. Friends in need are friends in deed.
There is no justification and it's only going to get worse. There is no known cure. There are no effective bill-of-rights-bypass bypass surgery methods currently in testing, approved or accepted.
Blocks, or block attempts, are a bad choice in general. Perhaps a thread collapse option would do nicely: report button and a collapse thread when reported message is first post in thread.
He may have confused that fact that the system queries the operator when things need another look which may or may not lead to a request for immediate attention or a request to the secret court in order to bust out the man power.
That and browsing the data feeds, gosh, in pretty much real real-time, is not exactly a well formed query. I can see how some clarification on the usage of "query" may have been necessary.
They told everyone but not some people and they told everyone everything but not some things and these things were widely known except for a what's not known and everyone approved everything over and over again but not some things and not every time. I think that covers everyone except someone somewhere. So.. they nailed it by tacking it by licking it and sticking it to the wall temporarily but temporarily permanent and with a transparency transparently obvious to everyone but not anyone.
Ahah, so you are just another one of those perverse maximalist copyright law manipulator cunts! Now that we know what it is that you actually care about the rest of us will continue not caring. Oh and thanks for nothing.
Now you're just being obnoxious, arrogant and threatening. Nice triple play. What's your next trick?
Maybe if you pose your question to the public, directly, because that's who is privy, and deliver it with some precision then you might get what you want out of him along with other input that you probably don't have the slightest interest in. You are harassing a specific individual, directly, in public, and yet you are.. what? An idiot bot? Well done.
State the specifics of your opinion about ( what? copyrights?) without the conflicts of this abhorrent public personality conflict. One that you abuse behind anonimity (so you thought). I have no idea who mike is and, well, I worry about other shit but you. have. issues. I'd inquire into a restraining order if this were my gig, at least until you can pose a fucking question that doesn't include the dog that ate your favorite teddy bear when you were a kid. One's opinion is one one, even one not fully formed, and yet you're busy being a pussy because you don't even have your own apart from the profit margin in your wallet.
Just another teat on bull with no calves to suckle your.. milk. .. Nothing.
Yeah, because I have a different phone number at least twice a month and it's never the same twice and people could never duplicate and imitate my phone number.
When "law" is successfully twisted into something you desire to further your view law begins to, in real time, eat away at its very premise. Law too guide men, not rule them. And here, in this country, when law has been twisted and mangled in order to DIRECTLY sap the strength of liberty and further empower those that wield power then that course of law has run to an end. The text of the Constitution is simple and we've manipulated ourselves onto the doorsteps of hell.
Our effects consist of our communications. Communications enabled via a third party does not, as it's been painted to be, remotely imply that said third party owns that communication and, even further, any fourth party must not be made privy to those communications without just cause. The party of the first part and the party of the second part should never be made to surrender what is theirs in order to further the standing of parties three through nine-thousand.
No law is held mine should that law take what is rightly mine - as I live and breath.
On the post: Feds Claim Phone Data It Scooped Up Doesn't Include Location Data, And Also [REDACTED]
Re: Re: Re: So, even if the NSA found a terrorist in the data they're collecting...
Ya'll dint think that was a joke didja?
The point of this whole exercise is that the Department of Defense is unleashed within our borders. Not only is that a no-no it's flat out bat shit crazy.
Our military, in case you were unaware, is a well oiled killing and control machine. They follow orders quite well. The controls that were in place to prevent that machine from operating on its own soil have been chipped away at. That trend must be reversed.
THERE IS NO FUCKING WAR ON TERRORISM. Ass munchers. Just a facade for 'the hunt for evil doers' and your monies - not too mention a little strategic awareness planning.
On the post: Snowden's Secrets 'Belong To The People Of The US' & He's A Traitor For Giving Them What They Own?
Re:
It can also be argued that the above is against the law no matter how many new laws are passed to try and make it legal.
There can be no just law that would legalize this government to aim for, much less achieve, a surveillance state. It, quite simply, can not exist. And yet, what have we now? A surveillance state thus total constitutional subversion, "yes man" oversight, executive coup and a broken republic. A genuine "me first" nation. Outstanding.
On the post: Snowden's Secrets 'Belong To The People Of The US' & He's A Traitor For Giving Them What They Own?
Anyone that gives more of a fuck about Snowden than what he's revealed has been successfully tooled.
The idiots flail their arms and deign outrage because they've all been straight-up proven to be the pocket-flush mind-fucks that they are. "Traitor!" See how easy that is? No effort - no real work to be done - redirecting outrage with seven measly letters and successfully throwing a meaty bone to the smart people who have no problem swallowing it whole. Idiots - It's becoming apparent that I'm surrounded by and led by bricks and idiots.
On the post: Trading Lives For Freedom Is The American Way
On the post: Latest Leak: UK Spies Tap Internet Cables, Collect Nearly Everything With Little Oversight, Then Shares It With NSA
Re: Re: Re: These stories are great but really...
On the post: Latest Leak: UK Spies Tap Internet Cables, Collect Nearly Everything With Little Oversight, Then Shares It With NSA
They've ensured that there will never be another revolution in the "free" world.
Dopplegangers. Blue pills. Red pills. Vendettas.
"..That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.."
I do not concede.
On the post: NSA: If Your Data Is Encrypted, You Might Be Evil, So We'll Keep It Until We're Sure
Tyranny Bedrock
This has turned into a sick, fucked up joke and if you're not laughing the joke's on you.
As soon as the powers of the NSA were unleashed within its own borders it was game over.
Secret data, secret sources, secret tips, secret courts, secret enforcement, secret government, secret law, secret all powerful gods to rule over the engines of commerce.
Soon
Everything
Creates a
Reasonable
Expectation of
Tyranny
Personally, I think some current and previous heads of government need to be tried for treason against the people. "To protect" does not override the foundational laws of freedom.
"The people" are the very last means of protection that any people have.
Doomed. Doooooommmeed.
I hope that all your hopes of abortion and immigrants and prayer in school and gun ownership, and favorite reality tv show ends the way you want it to! Fucking tools.
On the post: States Attorneys General Want Special Exception To Blame Sites For Actions Of Users
We need to redefine the lengths and eliminate the distortions of "for limited Times".
On the post: NSA Claims Surveillance Programs Aided The Stopping Of 50 Attacks; Details Lacking
Re: Re:
We send thousands of soldiers to their deaths and dismemberment and mental fracturing in order to defend our freedoms and yet we'd have a problem when people could be murdered living those same freedoms? Both would be unfortunate endings to otherwise fruitful lives yet we would condemn ourselves to dust based upon a fictional trust?
These are not the freedoms people die for - These are the freedoms you're allowed to live with.
On the post: MPAA's Chris Dodd Will Be The Chair Of 'Free Speech Week'
Re: Two minutes of free speech.
On the post: MPAA's Chris Dodd Will Be The Chair Of 'Free Speech Week'
Re: Re: Re: Free speech is NOT links to infringing content.
Broken law should be broken.
Broken business plan should break.
On the post: NSA Claims Surveillance Programs Aided The Stopping Of 50 Attacks; Details Lacking
P0wned - in well fell swoop. Your DNA please.
On the post: MPAA's Chris Dodd Will Be The Chair Of 'Free Speech Week'
Re: Re: Re: What a joke
On the post: The NSA's Lockbox Has No Lock
Re:
That and browsing the data feeds, gosh, in pretty much real real-time, is not exactly a well formed query. I can see how some clarification on the usage of "query" may have been necessary.
On the post: Knowing The Government Is Spying On You Changes How You Act
Think of the Children!
On the post: MPAA's Chris Dodd Will Be The Chair Of 'Free Speech Week'
Re: Re: Re: Schedule for rest of month:
On the post: MPAA's Chris Dodd Will Be The Chair Of 'Free Speech Week'
Re:
On the post: DailyDirt: Inspired By Nature
Re:
Maybe if you pose your question to the public, directly, because that's who is privy, and deliver it with some precision then you might get what you want out of him along with other input that you probably don't have the slightest interest in. You are harassing a specific individual, directly, in public, and yet you are.. what? An idiot bot? Well done.
State the specifics of your opinion about ( what? copyrights?) without the conflicts of this abhorrent public personality conflict. One that you abuse behind anonimity (so you thought). I have no idea who mike is and, well, I worry about other shit but you. have. issues. I'd inquire into a restraining order if this were my gig, at least until you can pose a fucking question that doesn't include the dog that ate your favorite teddy bear when you were a kid. One's opinion is one one, even one not fully formed, and yet you're busy being a pussy because you don't even have your own apart from the profit margin in your wallet.
Just another teat on bull with no calves to suckle your.. milk. .. Nothing.
On the post: Al Gore Says NSA Surveillance Is Unconstitutional And 'Not The American Way'
Re: Re: Re:
When "law" is successfully twisted into something you desire to further your view law begins to, in real time, eat away at its very premise. Law too guide men, not rule them. And here, in this country, when law has been twisted and mangled in order to DIRECTLY sap the strength of liberty and further empower those that wield power then that course of law has run to an end. The text of the Constitution is simple and we've manipulated ourselves onto the doorsteps of hell.
Our effects consist of our communications. Communications enabled via a third party does not, as it's been painted to be, remotely imply that said third party owns that communication and, even further, any fourth party must not be made privy to those communications without just cause. The party of the first part and the party of the second part should never be made to surrender what is theirs in order to further the standing of parties three through nine-thousand.
No law is held mine should that law take what is rightly mine - as I live and breath.
On the post: CISPA's Sponsors Can't Keep Their Story Straight: If Snowden's Leaks Are False, How Do They Harm America?
Re: Re: Re:
Next >>