No, the Commodore 64 only has upper case. Clearly that level of computing would be appropriate for this level of lawyering. (no insult to the C=64 was meant with this comment).
I don't care if the cop looks me in the eyes and pleads for help. Is HIS immunity going to cover me as well? Hell no. So when the perp sues everyone involved, the cops walk free and I'm left holding the bag. And will he remember asking for help? Will he come to MY defense then? SURE he will. And I have some coastal property in Arizona I'd like for you to purchase sight-unseen.
Or the world's most inflated ego, if he thinks he can go toe to toe with the paid lawyers of the Washington Post (owned by Bezos) and the Huffington Post (owned by AOL). I'm betting that any single lawyer from either of those companies' salaries are greater than St. Louis's entire staff.
that someone stole a box of their letterhead and is filing stupid lawsuits in their name. They might want to look into that before their reputation is utterly destroyed by the Striesand Effect.
Care to support that with a single example? And since all the source documents are right there, and most of us enjoy reading the details, did you really thing you'd get any traction with such baseless statements, troll?
Obama didn't lie. In his mind, it will never happen, because after all, laws don't apply to him anyway. If a treaty says we have to do something the government doesn't want to do, they'll just Executive Decree it, say "Because Terrorist and Security, and The Children!" and then ignore it. When was the last time an administration actually did something it didn't want to do?
I would never hire this guy, not because of anything he has done, but because what he DIDN'T do. Aren't lawyers supposed to do research? I mean, multiple hundreds of dollars an hour research. Clearly this fellow's research isn't work a tinker's damn.
A nice, thorough TOR trip around the world a few times until you land at WikiLeaks. They'll BitTorrent the whole thing, and then you won't be able to put that genie back into a bottle.
And while I'm getting all angry about rip offs in bills
How does THIS work? (Wish I could embed pics)
Verizon says that my Flex Double Play costs $89.99/month (for FiOS TV Prime HD and FiOS Quantum Internet (50/50 Mbps))
On the My Bill page of www.myverizon.com, it says that FiOS TV Prime is 54.99 and FiOS Internet 50/50 is 50.00 for a Double Play Bundle Price of 94.99. So the price goes up by $5 between the two pages of their website.
What is up with THAT? That says fraud to me, but IANAL.
Is the settop box, that you MUST rent if you want HD. Verizon FIOS, paying for a TV package that includes HD channels, but the FREE box (and oh,yeah, you can't just hook it up to a Smart TV) DOESN'T SUPPORT HD. You gotta pay $11.99 to SEE the HD you are paying for. That one really sticks in my craw.
Removing rights of criminals is just the first step in removing rights for ALL OF US. Hasn't it been said that we all (usually accidentally) break laws everyday, and that no one can know all the laws that exist? So the key to permanently disenfranchising anyone would be as simple as just getting them convicted of some stupid law/crime? That sounds mind-bogglingly bad to me.
On the post: Web Sheriff Accuses Us Of Breaking Basically Every Possible Law For Pointing Out That It's Abusing DMCA Takedowns
Re: NEW KEYBOARD
On the post: DOJ Says Judge Can't Order Its Lying Lawyers To Attend Ethics Classes
Re: Good faith, good faith,
Good faith, bad faith, it's all subjective and bullshit. I don't care a fig for it.
On the post: How A Treasury Terror List Is Preventing Americans With 'Scary' Names From Using Online Services
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Gamasutra is poison
While I once was a gamer, I've long outgrown that label. However, I suspect that this all revolves around that crapfest that is known as Gamergate.
On the post: Boston Police Commissioner Wants Cameras Further Away From Cops, Criminal Charges For Not Assisting Officers
Re: Re:
On the post: St. Louis County Charges Journalists Who Covered Ferguson Protests With Trespassing
Gotta say, this prosecutor's got balls
On the post: City Tries To Silence YouTube Critic By Suing For Copyright Infringement
Someone needs to tell MajestyLaw
On the post: Lawyer Stupidly Sues EFF For Defamation After It Called His Stupid Patent Stupid
Re: Author is Stupid
On the post: Even Before TPP And TTIP, US Already Being Forced To Change Laws By Trade Agreements
I think everybody's taking this the wrong way....
On the post: UK Plans To Do Away With Free Speech... In The Name Of Free Speech
Countdown
On the post: Faith Healer Adam Miller Sues Over Critical YouTube Video, Guaranteeing It Tons Of Attention
They haven't repealed their Anti-SLAPP law
On the post: Another Company Thinks The Best Way To Handle A Security Hole Is To Send A Lawyer After The Person Who Discovered It
Asshat companies like this make it real hard
On the post: US Marshal Shuts Down Citizen Recording By Grabbing Phone And Smashing It On The Ground
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nah, when these bad boys act up the taxpayers get to pay
On the post: Is Merely Explaining The Streisand Effect To Someone A 'Threat'?
What this actually reveals
On the post: Wordpress Wins Case Against DMCA Abuser... Who Ignored The Proceedings
Re: Re:
On the post: Waterboarding Whistleblower Released From Prison, Two Months After Torture Report's Release Vindicated His Actions
Re: Re:
But that's not the stated goal here. It's to get actionable intelligence. In that case, it fails utterly.
Please tell me that you don't think that the US's use to torture was for propaganda purposes. That would make a terrible situation EVEN WORSE!
On the post: Police Union: You Can Have Safe Neighborhoods Or Be Free Of Flashbang-Burned Toddlers, But Not Both
I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet, but
On the post: Will Senator Burr's Attempt To Bury CIA Torture Report Actually Make It More Likely The Report Leaks?
Might I suggest
On the post: The Cable Industry's Latest Lame Argument: We're Burying Sneaky Fees In Your Bill As Part Of An Effort To Be More Transparent
And while I'm getting all angry about rip offs in bills
Verizon says that my Flex Double Play costs $89.99/month (for FiOS TV Prime HD and FiOS Quantum Internet (50/50 Mbps))
On the My Bill page of www.myverizon.com, it says that FiOS TV Prime is 54.99 and FiOS Internet 50/50 is 50.00 for a Double Play Bundle Price of 94.99. So the price goes up by $5 between the two pages of their website.
What is up with THAT? That says fraud to me, but IANAL.
On the post: The Cable Industry's Latest Lame Argument: We're Burying Sneaky Fees In Your Bill As Part Of An Effort To Be More Transparent
My "Favorite" Ripoff fee
On the post: ACLU Challenges Law That Says Convicts Lose Free Speech Rights If Their Speech Upsets Crime Victims
Re: Re:
Next >>