Google and Youtube get a lot of removal notices? Are they going to exempt themselves? If so this could open Google to anti-trust and anti-competitive suites.
Cyber-locker music sharing only accounts to 3-4% however the RIAA and MPAA are at war with the very concept of off-site file storage. They have severely crippled cloud computing for an significant problem.
The copyright imbalance is not in favor of creators. In fact our copyright and patent laws are a mill stone around creators necks. We do not have freedom to create. The song writer, the author, the painter, nor the inventor is free to express whatever they want. They must first traverse a minefield of copyrighted and patented works forever fearing that someone somewhere will accuse them of infringing.
Who copyright benefits are the non-creators who make a living off of other peoples work and who can afford to hire lawyers.
It is worse than not standing up to fair use. This is a company that does not believe in fair use so they want to set standards that do not even acknowledge its existence.
Copyright used to be the sole domain of professional publishers. They were able to make laws with impunity because there was not a perception that they effected the public. Even today with international negotiations the content industry are considered the only "stakeholders".
In the internet age that narrow view of "stakeholder" no longer applies. We are all stakeholders now and our voice must be heard.
The people are taking to the streets due to the over-reach of rights-holders and governments that has shown a willingness to subornate human rights as well as freedom of speech to copyrights.
To suggest that the answer is for rights-holders to ratchet it up even further is only going to continue to inflame the public.
Instead of admitting their mistake they are now covering their tracks to make this look like it was not politically motivated. It isn't working.
If I was Al Green I would be incensed. For older artists having your music on Youtube is essential to keep your songs from being forgotten since the labels tend to dump old artists to make way for new music where profits are higher.
The people who have no receptors are the RIAA types who can sue a single mother for millions and sleep at night. There is a word for people like this. Sociopath.
DPI slows down networks and decreases bandwidth. The US already has the slowest bandwidth in the western world. DPI is overkill and would be akin to the post office reading every piece of mail to make sure no one is doing anything illegal.
It is interesting that the MPAA is touting these services when there is not one they did not try and sue out of existence upon their inception and even now keep them on an extremely tight leash and never allow them to reach their potential and constantly demand more licencing fees that render these services barely profitable.
Government Acting the Part of Drug Addict Enablers
It would be one thing if all this effort was actually helping Hollywood and the Music Industry but in reality all the government is doing is enabling those industries to continue in their self-destructive behavior.
Piracy is not Hollywood's problem. It is a symptom of their problem which is a fundamental and permanent problem with their business models. The government is acting in the same capacity as those that enable drug addicts. They may mean well but when you have industries that rely on government enforcement rather than meet the demands of consumers then neither they nor the government are serving them nor the public well.
Targeting someones political group is now racist? I know many on the left like to define racist so broadly you can drive a Mack Truck through it but this is ridiculous.
Lets say someone produces an algorithm that produces billions of different tunes? Would all those tunes be under copyright? That person could put any song written after that through a music camparator and if there are any matches could he sue for copyright infringement?
On the flip side could any existing songs that matches any of the tunes make the person liable for copyright infringement?
Obama has been more secretive than Bush and has denied more Freedom of Information requests than Bush. Obama also has classified more material that would not have been under previous administrations.
What members of Congress needs to do is pledge to vote against any TPP agreement if there is not more transparency. Let them know that if USTR insists on secrecy and keeping things away from Congress that all their work will be of not.
On the post: Google Caves To Hollywood Pressure: Will Now Punish Sites That Get Lots Of 'Valid' DMCA Notices
Re: valid copyright removal notices
On the post: Music Labels Have No Plans To Share Any Money They Get From The Pirate Bay With Artists
Ponzi Scheme
On the post: RIAA Knows (But Tried To Hide) That Most 'Unpaid' Music Acquisition Comes From Offline Swapping
Cyber-Lockers account for a tiny fraction.
On the post: Are The Courts Finally Trying To Bring Some Balance Back To Copyright?
Copyright a millstone around creators necks
Who copyright benefits are the non-creators who make a living off of other peoples work and who can afford to hire lawyers.
On the post: YouTube Decides Obama Singing Al Green Is Fair Use; Restores All The Videos
Sue BMG for abuse of the DMCA
On the post: Author Of Book About Android UI Told He Needs To Get Copyright Signoffs To Use Any App Screenshots
Worse than Not Standing up to Fair Use
On the post: Meet The Internet Defense League (And Join It, Too)
We Are ALL Stakeholders Now
In the internet age that narrow view of "stakeholder" no longer applies. We are all stakeholders now and our voice must be heard.
On the post: US And EU Still Clueless About What The SOPA And ACTA Defeats Really Mean
Rights-Holders, Lets Ratchet It Up Even Further
To suggest that the answer is for rights-holders to ratchet it up even further is only going to continue to inflame the public.
On the post: Even Obama Is A Pirate: BMG Issues New Takedown On Original Obama Singing Al Green Clip
SonyBMG United States Phone Number.
On the post: Even Obama Is A Pirate: BMG Issues New Takedown On Original Obama Singing Al Green Clip
BMG Digs Deeper
If I was Al Green I would be incensed. For older artists having your music on Youtube is essential to keep your songs from being forgotten since the labels tend to dump old artists to make way for new music where profits are higher.
On the post: Is This Chemical Why File Sharers Buy More Music?
Recording Industry Non-receptors.
On the post: Olympics Can't Hire Enough Actual Security, But Fully Staffed With 'Brand Police'
On the post: Is The Six Strikes Plan Being Delayed Because ISPs Are Pushing Back Against Hollywood Demands?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Olympic Level Ridiculousness: You Can't Link To The Olympics Website If You Say Something Mean About Them
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: MPAA Points To Its Roster Of Crappy Online Services And Asks What We're Complaining About
On the post: Dear Lamar Smith & House Judiciary: Have You Learned Nothing From SOPA?
Government Acting the Part of Drug Addict Enablers
Piracy is not Hollywood's problem. It is a symptom of their problem which is a fundamental and permanent problem with their business models. The government is acting in the same capacity as those that enable drug addicts. They may mean well but when you have industries that rely on government enforcement rather than meet the demands of consumers then neither they nor the government are serving them nor the public well.
On the post: Dear Angry Person: People Who Criticize You Likely Aren't Defaming You Or Infringing On Your Copyright
Criticizing Political Groups is now Racist?
On the post: DailyDirt: Computer Generated Music
Computer Generated Copyrights?
On the flip side could any existing songs that matches any of the tunes make the person liable for copyright infringement?
On the post: Over 130 Representatives Spell Out Their Concerns With TPP In Letter To Ron Kirk
Re:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/21/nation/la-na-ticket21-2010mar21
On the post: Over 130 Representatives Spell Out Their Concerns With TPP In Letter To Ron Kirk
Senators Should Pledge Now to Vote Against TPP
Next >>