Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But this is EXACTLY what you wanted
"GONG! Sorry. I like the content I get from Big Content. I like the big stars in Hollywood and the huge blockbuster movies with too many extras and too many special effects. I'm happy to pay only $10 to enjoy entertainment that cost more than $100m to create. I think it's a great deal."
That explains a lot (besides being a shill, I mean). You ARE the lowest common denominator, and therefore mentally defective (as long as we're spouting opinion now).
"I don't want to get my war news from the bloggers who work for the Pentagon. "
Seriously? WTF are you talking about now?
"So I don't want the system to fail."
Too late.
"Yet you seem to think that you have a right to destroy my business model and I'm the one who's supposed to find something else to do? "
I did not destroy your business model. Technology advanced, and you failed to keep up. Goodbye and good riddance.
"If you don't like it, spend your money elsewhere."
I already have for over five years now. Instead of whining like a little bitch, I adapted. Try it, you might like it.
You're going to have to find a new way to enjoy your entertainment anyway, as you cannot stop the progress of technology, no matter how hard you try, or how much money you spend.
Why? because we are infinitely smarter than you, and always one step ahead.
I look forward to thoroughly tromping you (technologically speaking, of course).
"Already, airport security companies cackling at the chance to develop new detection tech for surgically implanted bombs. An Indiana company claims to have developed an imagery machine that can find “explosive materials, narcotics, and low-density plastics hidden inside or outside of the human body,” according to its CEO, by analyzing X-rays scattered or refracted from the body’s soft tissue."
Agreed. Too bad for them that I already have in place a system to encrypt all my traffic and bounce it around the whole damned world before it reaches its destination.
"I think you really need to understand that the Wild West stage of the internet is going away. Not tomorrow, but every day it gets a little more tamed, a little more under control."
Keep repeating your mantra and maybe it will come true. /sarc
Do us all a favor and hold your breath until it is tamed.
"i dont need to run or hide, you and your kind are way to stupid to scare me"
My sentiments exactly.
When I heard about three strikes, I thought "that's two more than I need". Because the first warning will tell me what I did wrong, and I'll fix it so they won't notice (assuming they notice in the first place ;) ).
Now I have four (or five) more warnings than I need.
On the post: The Rest Of The Story: Fair Use School Created To Respond To YouTube's Questionable Copyright School
Re: Re: Re:
Just sayin'
On the post: ISP's Five Strikes Plan: Railroading, MPAA/RIAA-Style
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But this is EXACTLY what you wanted
That explains a lot (besides being a shill, I mean). You ARE the lowest common denominator, and therefore mentally defective (as long as we're spouting opinion now).
"I don't want to get my war news from the bloggers who work for the Pentagon. "
Seriously? WTF are you talking about now?
"So I don't want the system to fail."
Too late.
"Yet you seem to think that you have a right to destroy my business model and I'm the one who's supposed to find something else to do? "
I did not destroy your business model. Technology advanced, and you failed to keep up. Goodbye and good riddance.
"If you don't like it, spend your money elsewhere."
I already have for over five years now. Instead of whining like a little bitch, I adapted. Try it, you might like it.
You're going to have to find a new way to enjoy your entertainment anyway, as you cannot stop the progress of technology, no matter how hard you try, or how much money you spend.
Why? because we are infinitely smarter than you, and always one step ahead.
I look forward to thoroughly tromping you (technologically speaking, of course).
On the post: ISP's Five Strikes Plan: Railroading, MPAA/RIAA-Style
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: But this is EXACTLY what you wanted
It's not stealing, it's copying.
All of the rest of your arguments are based on this false premise, therefore ALL of your arguments are false.
Good day!
On the post: TSA Planning New, Even More Invasive Security Measures In Response To 'Threat' Of Implanted Bombs
Re:
On the post: TSA Planning New, Even More Invasive Security Measures In Response To 'Threat' Of Implanted Bombs
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Where does it end?
On the post: TSA Planning New, Even More Invasive Security Measures In Response To 'Threat' Of Implanted Bombs
Re:
"Already, airport security companies cackling at the chance to develop new detection tech for surgically implanted bombs. An Indiana company claims to have developed an imagery machine that can find “explosive materials, narcotics, and low-density plastics hidden inside or outside of the human body,” according to its CEO, by analyzing X-rays scattered or refracted from the body’s soft tissue."
Sorry, no joy for you! ;)
On the post: Did The Entertainment Industry Backdoor In Forcing ISPs To Kick People Offline, While Claiming It Did Not?
Re: Re: doubtful
On the post: Trolls: The Town Drunks Of The Internet
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Trolls: The Town Drunks Of The Internet
Re: Re: Re: What about the professional trolls?
...connected using a cradle modem...
On the post: Trolls: The Town Drunks Of The Internet
Re: Re: Re: What about the professional trolls?
On the post: Wikileaks Can Receive Visa & Mastercard Donations Again... But Visa Doesn't Understand Why
Re:
On the post: Murdochs' Latest Attempt At Crisis Control: Kill Off News Of The World
On the post: Congress Tries To Hide Massive Data Retention Law By Pretending It's An Anti-Child Porn Law
Re:
Good luck to them trying to sort that out.
On the post: RIAA Accounting: How To Sell 1 Million Albums And Still Owe $500,000
Re:
On the post: RIAA Accounting: How To Sell 1 Million Albums And Still Owe $500,000
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Wait a sec, Mike: did the band get $1M? If so, that's plenty.
What a convincing argument.
Sod off.
On the post: Major US ISPs Agree To Five Strikes Plan, Rather Than Three
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: When can we start submitting accusations
On the post: Major US ISPs Agree To Five Strikes Plan, Rather Than Three
Re: Re: Re:
...and then the sheriff gets shot...
On the post: Major US ISPs Agree To Five Strikes Plan, Rather Than Three
Re: Re: Re:
I think your helmet is on too tight.
On the post: Major US ISPs Agree To Five Strikes Plan, Rather Than Three
Re:
Keep repeating your mantra and maybe it will come true. /sarc
Do us all a favor and hold your breath until it is tamed.
kthxbye.
On the post: Major US ISPs Agree To Five Strikes Plan, Rather Than Three
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Only the web!
My sentiments exactly.
When I heard about three strikes, I thought "that's two more than I need". Because the first warning will tell me what I did wrong, and I'll fix it so they won't notice (assuming they notice in the first place ;) ).
Now I have four (or five) more warnings than I need.
Next >>