TSA Planning New, Even More Invasive Security Measures In Response To 'Threat' Of Implanted Bombs
from the security-theater-is-reactionary dept
One of the main problems of the TSA's brand of security theater is that it's totally reactionary. Nearly every bit of it is designed to stop the last threat, rather than face the larger issues of identifying threats in general. A group supposedly planned to use liquid explosives? You can't bring liquids through security any more! Some jackass tried to light a shoebomb on fire? Everyone remove your shoes! This has resulted in people guessing just how far this will go. Years back, this even led Bruce Schneier to run his movie threat contest, in which the goal was to come up with all sorts of movie-plot style threats, which would then render the TSA helpless.And, now, for all the talk of the ridiculous new naked scanners and gropings, people have realized that won't do any good if someone has a bomb implanted within them. So... guess what? The TSA is now claiming that they have reports that terrorists are planning to implant bombs inside people to blow up on flights... and that the existing scanners won't spot them. So they may start implementing brand new security procedures which they won't tell anyone about just yet.
Somehow, none of this makes me feel any safer... and my bigger concern here remains the TSA over terrorists. Nothing in what's being done suggests that the TSA is even close to focusing on who is getting on flights, and instead continues to focus on what is being brought on flights, which is a pretty pointless endeavor when you realize that there are always ways to get the next thing on board.
I certainly agree that it would be incredibly tragic if someone had an implanted bomb and it blew up a plane. And, contrary to the claims of some, I'm not advocating that we do away with security altogether. I'd just like to see security that actually focuses on trying to stop a real attacker, not on finding the lady with 4 ounces of liquid in her purse.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: implanted bombs, scanning, search, tsa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Just in her purse?
Or those old ladies with four ounces of dried liquid in their diapers ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
D�j�-vu... all over again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: D�j�-vu... all over again...
More practically, there is almost no way this is a credible threat. I read some years ago that the amount of explosive you would have to implant would be MUCH larger than you woulds, say, wrap around yourself, because of the damping effect of the human body getting in the way. Some guy who has just been surgically implanted with C4 is not going to feel well or act normally, and I even wonder if it's possible to put enough in a person to actually bring down a plane (vs tearing a small hole, or killing a few very nearby passengers).
At this point the "terrorists" must just be jumping up and down giggling at how stupid we are...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: D�j�-vu... all over again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike's pattern: Rant, then play up the fear.
But, Americans are able to ignore the hundreds of thousands being killed with their bombs in countries that didn't attack us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mike's pattern: Rant, then play up the fear.
/acidic dripping sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: out_of_the_blue's pattern: Rant, then play up the fear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"Already, airport security companies cackling at the chance to develop new detection tech for surgically implanted bombs. An Indiana company claims to have developed an imagery machine that can find �explosive materials, narcotics, and low-density plastics hidden inside or outside of the human body,� according to its CEO, by analyzing X-rays scattered or refracted from the body�s soft tissue."
Sorry, no joy for you! ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
that's only the submarine crews
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Called it weeks ago. We're now one step away from taking the hacksaw to Snoopy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yay money...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
unreasonable
Is it unreasonable enough yet?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: unreasonable
lets follow the money and see who profited off of the naked scanners.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: unreasonable
Follow the money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: unreasonable
you have an odd sense of humor. The only thing funny in there is that the company is named Rapiscan, which continues to make me giggle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: unreasonable
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One of them says, "what should would we "leak" next time?" The other responds, "um... let's say that we're planning on lining the anal cavity of our suicide bombers with explosive substances and that we're using American-looking white males as the bombers!"
Three weeks later, the press release states, "the TSA is stepping up their non-invasive and completely necessary security procedures to include anally probing white male passengers for explosive substances. A credible report states that terrorists are using the anal cavity to smuggle explosive materials onto the planes. All patriotic citizens should willingly submit to anal probing to ensure the safety of all passengers. Remember, it's a sure sign that you're a terrorist if you express discontent with our security procedures!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where does it end?
Are we all then forced to get on the planes without clothes, bibles, korans, magazines, cloth bags, playing cards, and anything else made from cellulose? (wood, paper, etc)
I mean where does it end?
At this rate, all they need to do to cause the US government to destroy all civil liberties, and turn us into a police state, is publish "a book a day on how to" ...
... Do this nasty thing
... Do this other nasty thing
... Do this to thing to elementary schools
... Do that thing some place else
If the goal is to cause fear and anxiety, and cause western society to destroy itself, then its easy to accomplish. Ronald Regan used a similar technique to destroy the soviet union with the star wars program (SDI).
/rant
PS I heard the gun cotton thing on some radio, TV show, or movie. Its not my idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Where does it end?
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/End%20of%20the%20World/Genetics%20Nightmare/spider_goats.htm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Where does it end?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Where does it end?
From my understanding the military was planning to make lightweight(like silk) bulletproof armor. So I imagine the cheese wouldn't be very tasty...or edible. I don't think its so much goats milk with spider silk in it, but rather they replaced the gene that makes milk with a gene that makes silk so its goats spurting pure silk.
But since spider silk is as strong as steel and like a million times lighter (a strand that wrapped around the earth would weight about 18 ounces) if they are actually able to mass produce this stuff it would be awesome. You could literally build a skyscraper that you could pick up and dust under, or a spruce moose that can fly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Where does it end?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BioSteel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Where does it end?
It reminded me of this story
http://keboch.wordpress.com/2008/11/09/please-accept-this-spider-as-payment/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Where does it end?
http://www.27bslash6.com/
all his shit is hilarious, but i recommend this one
http://www.27bslash6.com/massanutten.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Where does it end?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Where does it end?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Where does it end?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58JsLdb2wHw
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So thats how ObamaCare saves us money!
I hope no one at the TSA watches South Park, imagine what they will want to do after seeing this:
http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/episodes/s11e04-the-snuke
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So thats how ObamaCare saves us money!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CX9Agzeh-c
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Glass Bottle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Science Fiction Predicted This in 1957
For details, read Eric Frank Russell's celebrated novel Wasp.
Somewhere in hell Bin Laden's ghost is grinning and saying "I love it when a plan comes together."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TSA has been all along groping for new ways to be offensive and for new territories to become necessary for their questionable services.
The only reason they are not a presence at trains is a lack of funding. It's not they don't want to be there, they just can't yet fund the machines or have enough people to man them.
For my part, I refuse to fly. I won't put up with sexual gropes. It offends me that as a paying customer I would have to deal with this. I spend my money like a vote. If I don't like it, whoever it is doesn't get my money by my choice. I will drive and have a chance to see the countryside while doing it. I'm not in that big of a hurry.
So when does the next potential threat include the trains to justify them being there? You can be sure buses follow and then random checks on the highway. I am surprised the government isn't making them wear a swastika on their sleeves and do an un-natural salute.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110621/02225414782/tsa-takes-security-theater-road-mobile -groping-teams-can-pop-up-anywhere.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm sorry guys, I didn't think they were reading this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Useless measures
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
turn them inside out?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Was that not covered by the Joker in a Batman movie?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Last Threat
Did they just now watch The Dark Knight? Will they try to protect us from exploding river ferrys next?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Though it has been miscast as "politically-incorrect", it has been in use *continually* since the first peace-keeper asked the obvious question, "what did the robber look like?"
The Israelis have proven it's effectiveness over and over.
We should be DEMANDING that the TSA use profiling techniques overtly.
But we won't. We have become a nation enslaved to the god of political correctness in most any aspect of our society. You fucking liberals demanded political correctness because you were too big of a pussy to defend yourself when you were offended. So, you had to have your nanny-state government (your true religion) outlaw being offended. That slippery slope led to the TSA mindlessly groping the 90-year old cancer patient because they aren't allowed to focus on the specific threats we face. We would offend rag-heads if we pointed out that *they* are 98% of all terrorists in the last twenty years (if not more).
Fucking left-wing/liberal/demoncrats/progressives have done more damage to the U.S. than they could ever hope to help, and the bulk of that damage has been due to unintended consequences. Or maybe they intended to fuck it up for everybody. I can't tell anymore. They always seem to want everybody to be equally miserable. Fuck em.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
look a bigfoot! oh, just another bigot
Second, if we had a list of features that we profiled and everyone else was safe what do you think the next guy trying to blow up a plane wouldn't look like?
"We would offend rag-heads if we pointed out that *they* are 98% of all terrorists in the last twenty years (if not more). "
So do you live in a fantasy world entirely or does your racism just not allow you to view the whole truth?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_United_States
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sorry i need to feed this troll some more
That isn't profiling, that is trying to identify a suspect after he has committed a crime. Profiling is trying to identify a suspect, based on superficial characteristics, before he commits a crime.
"The Israelis have proven it's effectiveness over and over. "
I know I wake up every day saying, " I would sure feel safer if the US was more like Isreal."
"You fucking liberals demanded political correctness because you were too big of a pussy to defend yourself when you were offended. So, you had to have your nanny-state government (your true religion) outlaw being offended."
You realize how retarded these sentences are right?
We were too afraid to do anything about being offended so we stood up and got government to do something. If we were so afraid wouldn't we have done nothing?
Then we are so offended we outlawed being offended? So we made ourselves outlaws, so you won? Who is we by the way people that aren't racist?
"That slippery slope led to the TSA mindlessly groping the 90-year old cancer patient because they aren't allowed to focus on the specific threats we face. Fucking left-wing/liberal/demoncrats/progressives have done more damage to the U.S. than they could ever hope to help, and the bulk of that damage has been due to unintended consequences. "
Wait was this caused by liberal policy or the Republicans that profit from rapiscan machines? Also the TSA was a republican invention.
"They always seem to want everybody to be equally miserable. Fuck em."
I think its your psychological problems making you miserable, you ever see the beginning of die-hard 3 where Bruce Willis is wearing the sandwich board sign? I suggest you try that as therapy.
On a lighter note, I got in a discussion with a Florida highway patrolman a few years ago about profiling. He said the group they were told to target the most, can you guess?, was 2 white males age 18-25 driving out of Florida and doing the speed limit. They are the most likely to be hauling drugs (because racists like this guy would probably just want to pull over everyone who isn't white) and the greatest suspicion is that when do young white kids drive the speed limit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Return to good old days with modifications to add competition
One example would be to keep the stronger cockpits and some other measures but revert to pre TSA days.
Perhaps the flight routes could not pass near certain places in the US (not a problem for most air travel) or would have to avoid certain airports or entry angles.
We have 21st century computers to resolve the logistics of this two-tier system.
We'd get competitive data points by which to measure the TSA costs and effectiveness. We'd save tax dollars and have many happier flying customers.
Pilots crashing on purpose (or by accident) would be no higher of a threat than is the case now, for example.
Essentially, the people on board would know the risks ahead of time, and they'd have paid for this. The people would know to fight off on board attacks. We'd still avoid most threats as we did in pre-2001 days. AND, to neuter the only argument possibly against this, we'd do a great job or eliminating the threat altogether of using the plane as a controlled missile to create national chaos.
This "revolutionary" addition basically already worked for many many decades, giving airplanes the reputation for being the safest way to travel.
It's only a matter of time until we do the obvious. I wonder who will get credit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Passenger 51
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CT Scan
That's the way there're going to find implanted devices.
On the plus side, people with cancer who don't know it might be able to get that diagnosis... They might also get cancer from constant radiation exposure but, hey, that hasn't stopped the TSA before.
For the record, the extra exposure is minimal but you know how the crazies are with their conspiracy theories about the harm these machines do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: CT Scan
Statistically, it takes doses well over the safety thresholds to have a reasonable chance of getting cancer. Just as statistically you need to buy a lot of lottery tickets to have a reasonable chance to win.
But just as with lottery tickets, you could get it on the first ticket, or any one ticket after that.
So it is a good idea to, when reasonable, avoid any form of radiation capable of breaking the molecular bonds in DNA.
Unless you are feeling lucky.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fliers: Do we have to feel up the elderly, handicapped and infants?
TSA: No, a single hole is what will get exploited by the terrorists, rendering the system useless.
Fliers: These scanners don't get for internally planted bombs, or bombs inside fat rolls, etc. Your invasive system has weaknesses in it.
TSA: These scanners are necessary for the security of our nation....
I heard a guest on NPR (Diane Reahm) this morning stating this same BS logic, and his argument was the argument against these scanners didn't hold much water. WHAT!?
Damn them, what they're doing to us is wrong. Damn them to hell for stepping on the constitution and getting away with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Terrorists routinely bomb security check points
But despite this knowledge, TSA forms large lines that wind about themselves to make dense groups of people prior to screening.
Really smart. I feel so much safer, knowing that my security is in the hands of idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who is on the plane doesn't necessarily solve the problem either
For example, would you agree to a credit check before you boarded a plane? The first time it appears that someone who was in "massive debt" (ie: most everyone in America) took payment to bring something on a flight, it will happen. Are you unemployed, and flying to a job interview somewhere? Sorry about you luck, you're now a security risk!
How about your driving record? Get a speeding ticket on the way to the airport? Sorry, you're reckless and distracted. You must be a terrorist!
Taxes? Are you about to be audited? What do you have to live for? You must be a terrorist!
How about medical records? Just diagnosed with a fatal condition, and want to spend your remaining days with family? What do you have to live for? You must be a terrorist!
No, "who" over "what" doesn't solve the problem, as long as the deranged puppet masters of this security theatre are still making the rules.
Government has to solve the problem, that's what government is there for. However, the mentality and approach used to determine who is a threat has to change. Ignoring humanity, and liberty to appease the paranoid will achieve nothing.
Shane
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Based on the fact that they refuse to say what it is they're going to do, I'm going to assume that it involves performing surgery on people at random to "check for bombs".
Sounds insane? So does groping little girls, but they're already doing that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pucker up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
False Positives, anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
False Positives, anyone?
Congratulations, you are now a walking false positive for nitroglycerin, able to set off every explosives detector in the airport!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]