I did. I never bought into any sort of system wide fraud. I can say with certain certainty that there was no national rigging against trump. None.
My concern, and it has nothing to do with 20, is red states controlled by blue cities.
And this is not a 2020 concern. It’s a know in-the-future concern.
There are districts in these states, specifically California, and Illinois, that came down to closeness under 1000 votes, under 100 votes. In a few cases, Illinois and Georgia, under 10 votes. Now we’re within the margin of error.
In states like that: California, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, Georgia, Florida….
District errors can have an effect on electoral votes.
That would NOT change 2020.
It could be a factor in the future though.
My concern is for both parties. A flaw in one district can flip a state’s elector position. A fraud in one district can change the elector position.
Unlike you, I’m not on anything about Trump or Biden here. It’s about a single cat casting a vote. A single dead guy.
If I can do it for Trump, what the fuck is stopping you from saying it for Biden
I didn’t do it for Trump. That’s my point. I will never know with absolute certainty that any election result is 100% accurate unless I count every vote myself.
I believe Biden won. I’ve even qualified that belief against the “stolen” crowed with evidence of down ballot wins for republicans.
There’s another side to stocks. It’s called company control.
Not everyone buys stock to invest, eg money.
Some of us just look to support a company.
Or have a voice in direction.
It’s not always about the money. That’s what really ticks off wall-street. That the people are involved again.
I have stock. A dozen shares her, half dozen there. Few hundred, or thousand shares in some “penny” companies.
I don’t invest to make money. I invest to drive a product or service.
I have no interest here but I can easily see how some Trump fans can jump.
.
Some of my tech stock is unlikely to ever match inflation. But it gives me input into small companies that have targeted demographics.
In the end, there’s nothing wrong with buying into something you support.
Be it one vote in a million, or one out of 10, or 500 out of 10,000.
I can’t say unequivocally that there are no gods either.
And I can’t be 100% positive unless I personally count each and every ballot.
That’s every election held in this country over its existence.
I can not state to a fact; but in all likelihood of reasonable statistical probability: the election was free from result changing fraud.
Or do you actually believe there was a national conspiracy to commit such mass-scale voter fraud in at least four states that Biden…
No. I’ve said multiple times before I don’t believe that. This is a party that’s can’t secure their own servers. Forget about pulling off a targeted single line fraud.
and actually mean it.
No. But I will say:
It is highly unlikely that there was enough voter fraud to change the outcome.
Do you really believe they should’ve been able to see every mark, every name,
In an ideal application: yes.
I doubt you’ll have a rational answer to that, too.
Well, given I replied to you with an answer back in what, February?
That reply was, and remains:
It’s extremely unlikely any organised method of fraud,on a large enough scale to change the results, took place.
Combine that with my stated belief just a few replies up.
That I figure it was just the volume, of otherwise ignorant to the choices, of people who checked off Biden and submitted their ballots otherwise incomplete or filled in randomly.
You’ll find the national breakdown doesn’t do the turnout justice. The volume of districts that went 51/49 is far larger than the national numbers suggest.
Because by and large, it was Trump supporters doing that shit in 2020.
So? It happened. And it could have and should have been reviewed. Throughly!
has yet been proven
And never will be because nobody actually looked for it.
Keep defending that “but Trump actually won…
Uh, I don’t. Did you read my take or skip over it.
What doubts could you have left
Oh, you did read it.
My biggest concern was just how unable to watch the watchers were. Too far away to see.
My opinion is it was a generally accurate result. But it’s opinion.
Your doubts are bullshit
The joys of freedom. You have a right to your opinion.
I would have preferred a 100% national recount. But no, I don’t think it would have likely changed the results enough to change the president.
Not with how big of a margin republicans won down ballot.
why the hell else do you think so many Trumpists still reject COVID safety measures
Could be the whole ‘live free or die’ thing? Nah.
2020 election.
When damn near half the country believes fraud a competent electorate attempts to verify the results.
See I remember a time when a Republican one and the Dems went running to every court to recount and hanging chads and all that.
This was a closer election. One with multiple cases of fraud and tampering well documented.
Bags of completed ballots left in parking lots. Dumpsters.
Single party harvesting. Non delivery of ballots to known members of parties. Back dating of stamp cancellation.
But who cares as long as your own choice wins right?
Maybe he hoped thousands of people chanting outside would be a moment of personal consideration in congress? The thought to pause the process and review the results?
I’m fairly convinced the election was legitimate. My personal guess given the down ticket Republican wins was people voted for Biden only and submitted their ballots. Not knowing or caring about anyone else.
But we don’t know for sure and never will.
Do you have Trump-branded kneepads, by any chance?
Yes, some people find things other than what is said. It’s a mental fallacy. A mental failure. I didn’t watch anyone else. Only Trump’s portion. If anyone actively called for violence or law breaking against the federal government should be arrested and tried for not just instigation but treason.
I found no such call for violence from the president.
It’s not what about anything. It’s simple fact.
I have no partisan limit on calling out criminal actions.
I’m not the one ignoring criminal acts.
You keep saying “I’m not a Republican
I’m a libertarian. With strong liberal leanings and a few conservative beliefs.
Let me once again in bold letters eliminate myself from the Republican Party.
The Jewish god, Christian god, Islamic god, all the same god:
Get your self righteous arse down here and suck my little 7” multiracial cock.
Hey preacher man: keep handing out bibles. There’s a transportation distribution crisis. Bibles make great toilet paper.
It’s a fucking parasitic tumour until you cut the cord.
Here’s a way to solve the national debt and not only fund national health care but reach the extreme alt left idea of universal income:
Tax religious institutions. 80% sounds fair to me.
How about 100% tax on gas vehicle purchases and a 100% tax credit on electric vehicles? It pays for itself twice over!
Here’s an idea, how about free solar energy.
If you want to spend a billion dollars, spend it on somethiuseful
So yes: fuck the bipartisan NWO of life long politicians and fuck the god’s army Republicans and fuck the gia tit sucking dems.
The minority that broke the law should be punished for doing so.
I will not condemn the 6th any more than I will not condemn the whole of the BLM protests for the few that rioted and looted.
Those that break the law should be held accountable.
Yes. I did make that error. Once another member supplied a video link showing a different angle that clearly showed here as a threat to the interior; I corrected that mistake.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
I did. I never bought into any sort of system wide fraud. I can say with certain certainty that there was no national rigging against trump. None.
My concern, and it has nothing to do with 20, is red states controlled by blue cities.
And this is not a 2020 concern. It’s a know in-the-future concern.
There are districts in these states, specifically California, and Illinois, that came down to closeness under 1000 votes, under 100 votes. In a few cases, Illinois and Georgia, under 10 votes. Now we’re within the margin of error.
In states like that: California, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, Georgia, Florida….
District errors can have an effect on electoral votes.
That would NOT change 2020.
It could be a factor in the future though.
My concern is for both parties. A flaw in one district can flip a state’s elector position. A fraud in one district can change the elector position.
Unlike you, I’m not on anything about Trump or Biden here. It’s about a single cat casting a vote. A single dead guy.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
I didn’t do it for Trump. That’s my point. I will never know with absolute certainty that any election result is 100% accurate unless I count every vote myself.
I believe Biden won. I’ve even qualified that belief against the “stolen” crowed with evidence of down ballot wins for republicans.
On the post: Trump Given 30 Days To Have His Social Media Site Comply With Open Source License
Wrong license
Anyone here often knows I’m a supporter of the IDGAF methodology of licensing.
Too bad for Trump’s company here.
Should have used software from a freedom developer. Software licensed under a truly free for all form.
Such as Beer, or IDGAF, of COFFEE!
Because many of these copyleft licenses have become just another copyright headache.
On the post: Trump's Broken Social Media Venture Is Valued At Billions Of Dollars And Its Breaking Experts' Brains
The foundation of stocks
There’s another side to stocks. It’s called company control.
Not everyone buys stock to invest, eg money.
Some of us just look to support a company.
Or have a voice in direction.
It’s not always about the money. That’s what really ticks off wall-street. That the people are involved again.
I have stock. A dozen shares her, half dozen there. Few hundred, or thousand shares in some “penny” companies.
I don’t invest to make money. I invest to drive a product or service.
I have no interest here but I can easily see how some Trump fans can jump.
.
Some of my tech stock is unlikely to ever match inflation. But it gives me input into small companies that have targeted demographics.
In the end, there’s nothing wrong with buying into something you support.
Be it one vote in a million, or one out of 10, or 500 out of 10,000.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
Which is why I’m running around yelling stop the steal.
I didn’t even do that when Trump ‘won’ in 16! Or Obama, or King George the Unelected.
Biden is President.
Republicans aren’t helping their party for 24 by keeping this fraud election thing going.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
Glad you now understand!
99.999— is ≈ 100. It is not, however 100.
Now that you understand that I believe Biden nearly-certainly won, we can move one. Yes?
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
What a crazed reply!
I can’t say unequivocally that there are no gods either.
And I can’t be 100% positive unless I personally count each and every ballot.
That’s every election held in this country over its existence.
I can not state to a fact; but in all likelihood of reasonable statistical probability: the election was free from result changing fraud.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
No. I’ve said multiple times before I don’t believe that. This is a party that’s can’t secure their own servers. Forget about pulling off a targeted single line fraud.
No. But I will say:
It is highly unlikely that there was enough voter fraud to change the outcome.
In an ideal application: yes.
Well, given I replied to you with an answer back in what, February?
That reply was, and remains:
It’s extremely unlikely any organised method of fraud,on a large enough scale to change the results, took place.
Combine that with my stated belief just a few replies up.
That I figure it was just the volume, of otherwise ignorant to the choices, of people who checked off Biden and submitted their ballots otherwise incomplete or filled in randomly.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
Interesting opinion. I can’t stand the smell. Like dead 🦨 butt.
I’ll pass and stick to tobacco.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
Hence my long use of “King George W”
https://ballotpedia.org/Ballotpedia%27s_Election_Analysis_Hub,_2020
You’ll find the national breakdown doesn’t do the turnout justice. The volume of districts that went 51/49 is far larger than the national numbers suggest.
So? It happened. And it could have and should have been reviewed. Throughly!
And never will be because nobody actually looked for it.
Uh, I don’t. Did you read my take or skip over it.
Oh, you did read it.
My biggest concern was just how unable to watch the watchers were. Too far away to see.
My opinion is it was a generally accurate result. But it’s opinion.
The joys of freedom. You have a right to your opinion.
I would have preferred a 100% national recount. But no, I don’t think it would have likely changed the results enough to change the president.
Not with how big of a margin republicans won down ballot.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
Could be the whole ‘live free or die’ thing? Nah.
When damn near half the country believes fraud a competent electorate attempts to verify the results.
See I remember a time when a Republican one and the Dems went running to every court to recount and hanging chads and all that.
This was a closer election. One with multiple cases of fraud and tampering well documented.
Bags of completed ballots left in parking lots. Dumpsters.
Single party harvesting. Non delivery of ballots to known members of parties. Back dating of stamp cancellation.
But who cares as long as your own choice wins right?
Maybe he hoped thousands of people chanting outside would be a moment of personal consideration in congress? The thought to pause the process and review the results?
I’m fairly convinced the election was legitimate. My personal guess given the down ticket Republican wins was people voted for Biden only and submitted their ballots. Not knowing or caring about anyone else.
But we don’t know for sure and never will.
Nope. I have Husky. Quite comfortable.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
Your need to find such dog whistles in everything said is your problem.
Did it dawn on you that maybe it was the false sense of subtext that pushed the incompetent idiots to do something other that what was said?
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
Property rights, more specifically resources, are a cornerstone of the libertarian movement.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re: >"Peacefully" full stop
Yes, some people find things other than what is said. It’s a mental fallacy. A mental failure. I didn’t watch anyone else. Only Trump’s portion. If anyone actively called for violence or law breaking against the federal government should be arrested and tried for not just instigation but treason.
I found no such call for violence from the president.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
It’s not what about anything. It’s simple fact.
I have no partisan limit on calling out criminal actions.
I’m not the one ignoring criminal acts.
I’m a libertarian. With strong liberal leanings and a few conservative beliefs.
Let me once again in bold letters eliminate myself from the Republican Party.
The Jewish god, Christian god, Islamic god, all the same god:
Get your self righteous arse down here and suck my little 7” multiracial cock.
Hey preacher man: keep handing out bibles. There’s a transportation distribution crisis. Bibles make great toilet paper.
It’s a fucking parasitic tumour until you cut the cord.
Here’s a way to solve the national debt and not only fund national health care but reach the extreme alt left idea of universal income:
Tax religious institutions. 80% sounds fair to me.
How about 100% tax on gas vehicle purchases and a 100% tax credit on electric vehicles? It pays for itself twice over!
Here’s an idea, how about free solar energy.
If you want to spend a billion dollars, spend it on somethiuseful
So yes: fuck the bipartisan NWO of life long politicians and fuck the god’s army Republicans and fuck the gia tit sucking dems.
Fuck em all.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re: Re: Fuck your feelings
Yep! Not hiding anything.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re: Re: Re:
Wrong again.
I don’t blame the entirety for the acts of the few.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re:
The minority that broke the law should be punished for doing so.
I will not condemn the 6th any more than I will not condemn the whole of the BLM protests for the few that rioted and looted.
Those that break the law should be held accountable.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Those that entered the capital broke the law.
Not everyone entered the capital. Those that did not did not.
It’s that simple.
On the post: Chicago Court Gets Its Prior Restraint On, Tells Police Union Head To STFU About City's Vaccine Mandate
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes. I did make that error. Once another member supplied a video link showing a different angle that clearly showed here as a threat to the interior; I corrected that mistake.
Next >>