Why don't you argue why it isn't ridiculous? Oh...you'll just say it isn't and throw in an attack on Mike with no basis...WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU ACCUSE MIKE OF DOING!!!
You are assuming that ALL the content of these websites are in relation to infringing, which is laughable. Check out this snapshot of the discussion forums dated July 6th, 2010. You start at the top and there certainly are forums about getting TV on internet. If you scroll down, there are forums about futbol in different countries which would be protected speech as far as I know since other soccer forums haven't been seized by ICE.
I am just shocked that Mike would have the balls to actually put into action what he preaches on a daily basis. /sarc
If more people actually cared enough to make a change they would get involved. I, for one, applaud Mike's efforts. He is protecting his interests (freedom) as you are protecting yours (monopoly rents).
On the post: NYC/NBCUniversal Pro-Copyright Propaganda Contest For School Kids: Facts Not Allowed And Your Rights Don't Count
Re: Re: Re: OR!
On the post: NFL Ramps Up Security Theatre
Re: Re: Re: Do the math...
On the post: NFL Ramps Up Security Theatre
Re:
On the post: Insurers Suggest Podium & Stage Collapse Tragedies Are The Inevitable Result Of File Sharing?
Re: Obligatory:
On the post: Remember: Actors And 'Pirates' Can Be The Same People
Re: Re: Re: Clear this up for you: "leaks come from actors or others in the industry".
That is where your lobbying firm is located...and here you are...along with a bunch of other paytards down the street.
On the post: Big Tech Companies Funding University Research Labs... Only If They Promise To Open Source The Results
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: More Intellectual Property Fights Over Who Gets To Do What In New Orleans And Mardi Gras
Re:
On the post: The Cost Of Copyright Extension In Europe: 1 Billion Euros Paid By The Public
Re: "beneficiaries are the major record labels who have failed to adapt"
On the post: Are Entertainment Industry Profits More Important Than Civil Rights?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Are Entertainment Industry Profits More Important Than Civil Rights?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I replied. Now you're just changing your tune...as usual. But at least you admit that protected speech is being blocked.
On the post: SF MusicTech: A New Hope
Re: Precautionary
On the post: Are Entertainment Industry Profits More Important Than Civil Rights?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Canada Plans To Re-Introduce Bad Copyright Plan, With Damaging Digital Locks Provisions, With No Additional Consultation
Re: No Further Consultation
On the post: MPAA: Bad At Math & Bad At Economics
Re:
On the post: Don't Try To Create An Illustrated Version Of A David Bowie Song... Or The Copyright Police Will Come After You
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Don't Try To Create An Illustrated Version Of A David Bowie Song... Or The Copyright Police Will Come After You
Re:
On the post: Top Entrepreneurs Warn Congress: PROTECT IP Will Stifle Innovation & Hurt Job Growth
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
When has Masnick ever claimed to not look at IP addresses?
On the post: Top Entrepreneurs Warn Congress: PROTECT IP Will Stifle Innovation & Hurt Job Growth
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If more people actually cared enough to make a change they would get involved. I, for one, applaud Mike's efforts. He is protecting his interests (freedom) as you are protecting yours (monopoly rents).
On the post: Top Entrepreneurs Warn Congress: PROTECT IP Will Stifle Innovation & Hurt Job Growth
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Top Entrepreneurs Warn Congress: PROTECT IP Will Stifle Innovation & Hurt Job Growth
Re: Re: Re:
Next >>