"The moral rights of a work does not refer to the ethics of the author(s). Rather, this bundle of rights derives from the French term droit moral and refers to the right of the author to exercise control over his/her work. Whereas copyright may be transferred and lasts beyond the life of the author, moral rights resides with the author until the author’s death.
In the US, moral rights vest only in visual arts and can be found at 17 U.S.C. §106A (also known as the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990). Sculptures and paintings are common examples of objects in which moral rights would attach.
Moral rights give an author the ability to protect his or her work from alteration, degradation or distortion, regardless of the owner of the particular work. The Visual Artists Rights Act also allows the artist to control how a work is associated or perceived to prevent distortion of the work and possibly tarnish the artist’s reputation.
For more information about moral rights, see Moral Rights Basics."
"The moral rights of a work does not refer to the ethics of the author(s). Rather, this bundle of rights derives from the French term droit moral and refers to the right of the author to exercise control over his/her work. Whereas copyright may be transferred and lasts beyond the life of the author, moral rights resides with the author until the author’s death.
In the US, moral rights vest only in visual arts and can be found at 17 U.S.C. §106A (also known as the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990). Sculptures and paintings are common examples of objects in which moral rights would attach.
Moral rights give an author the ability to protect his or her work from alteration, degradation or distortion, regardless of the owner of the particular work. The Visual Artists Rights Act also allows the artist to control how a work is associated or perceived to prevent distortion of the work and possibly tarnish the artist’s reputation.
For more information about moral rights, see Moral Rights Basics."
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why did he explain copyright as a natural right in the Federalist
ME: Find me one member of congress who endorses abolishing copy right & Patent LAW.
YOU: Find me one person in this thread who believes differently. It ain't me, that's for sure.
ME: This is getting surreal Karl. The only people in the world , who want to abolish copy right & Patent LAW are all AND ONLY certain techdirt readers. Maybe a few hundred in the whole world. Mostly Anonymous Cowards.
Re: Re: Why did he explain copyright as a natural right in the Federalist
Wrong. The "natural right" of copy right was debated then , and even now, and Madison objectively illustrated that debate. In my humble opinion
It is a philosophical question, and unresolvable, except academically ,, but people will reach different conclusions there. A good proff with grade based on how well you express your view,, not weather they agree with you.
Law ---in practical application --is not philosophical .
"Copyright to a work created by an++++++ employee or under commission belongs to the employer ++++++and neither economic nor moral rights attach to the actual author employee. (...)"
reply :I WORK FOR ME.
--------------------------
very sloppy replies by you here Karl.
The issue came to a head in the first major American copyright case - Wheaton v. Peters in 1834. (...) The Federal Supreme Court concluded (...) that copyright was a privilege, not a right. In its opinion, the case was about protection against monopoly and accepted the English precedent for the United States. +++In the process, however, the Court also rejected +++what later became known as+++ the "moral" rights of authors. +++
===========================
The primary goal of copyright is not to reward authors, but "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts."
- Justice O'Connor, from the majority opinion in Feist v. Rural
------------
please remember in 1834. (...) The Federal Supreme Court,, was also supporting slavery.
Karl , you are too quick and sloppy with your replies. You can do better.
You are smart. Read more critically and more objectively.
Now you read everything with an agenda. Accept times you may be wrong.
Re: Konrath's proclamations that no amount of legislation, enforcement, or DRM will prevent human nature from making piracy the eventual victor are not wholly true. In many domains, piracy can be largely curbed through all these things. Large businesses d
"Yeah right! that is why Sweden has seen their piracy levels disapear, South Korea is not a haven for piracy anymore and China doesn't have piracy either, Japan doesn't have it and the U.S. is not the number 1 in the world in number of piracy numbers despite being the only place in the world that sued thousands and failed LoL"
They are not called, " nice People who respect the rights of others according to U.S. and international law."
The "Pirate party " is an unjust cause.
It is fueled by too much coffee , too much meth ,and other chemical drugs that pollute your moral judgment. It will not go far. Trust me.
(Smoke weed man !! Make Peace ! hug a tree. Go to the Gulf and clean some oil up.)
History is not on the Pirate side.
President Thomas Jefferson would hate you , and would use force to stop you from Pirating.
Re: Re: With a response like that I wouldn't be surprised if you weren't nameless one's alt or something. Or maybe angry dude is his alt. I've always suspected he is just trolling these comment threads
READ. Take a political theory class on Rights and privileges.
Or maybe review you high school "social studies" notes.
On the post: Woman Sues Google After She Follows Google Maps Directions And Gets Hit By A Car
"After doing such things, it may be natural for the driver to blame the technology, though it's unlikely to help you out much in court."
ME: You are right here Mike.
You see , there are times we agree !!!
On the post: Joe Konrath Explains Why Authors Shouldn't Fear File Sharing
Moral Rights Basics." // http://ogc.caltech.edu/moral_rights.htm
http://ogc.caltech.edu/moral_rights.htm
"The moral rights of a work does not refer to the ethics of the author(s). Rather, this bundle of rights derives from the French term droit moral and refers to the right of the author to exercise control over his/her work. Whereas copyright may be transferred and lasts beyond the life of the author, moral rights resides with the author until the author’s death.
In the US, moral rights vest only in visual arts and can be found at 17 U.S.C. §106A (also known as the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990). Sculptures and paintings are common examples of objects in which moral rights would attach.
Moral rights give an author the ability to protect his or her work from alteration, degradation or distortion, regardless of the owner of the particular work. The Visual Artists Rights Act also allows the artist to control how a work is associated or perceived to prevent distortion of the work and possibly tarnish the artist’s reputation.
For more information about moral rights, see Moral Rights Basics."
http://ogc.caltech.edu/moral_rights.htm
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
intellectual property Counsel // http://ogc.caltech.edu/moral_rights.htm
http://ogc.caltech.edu/moral_rights.htm
"The moral rights of a work does not refer to the ethics of the author(s). Rather, this bundle of rights derives from the French term droit moral and refers to the right of the author to exercise control over his/her work. Whereas copyright may be transferred and lasts beyond the life of the author, moral rights resides with the author until the author’s death.
In the US, moral rights vest only in visual arts and can be found at 17 U.S.C. §106A (also known as the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990). Sculptures and paintings are common examples of objects in which moral rights would attach.
Moral rights give an author the ability to protect his or her work from alteration, degradation or distortion, regardless of the owner of the particular work. The Visual Artists Rights Act also allows the artist to control how a work is associated or perceived to prevent distortion of the work and possibly tarnish the artist’s reputation.
For more information about moral rights, see Moral Rights Basics."
http://ogc.caltech.edu/moral_rights.htm
On the post: Joe Konrath Explains Why Authors Shouldn't Fear File Sharing
Debates with out resolution ,, is like a song that never ends ,,
It does not mean they all agree
On the post: Joe Konrath Explains Why Authors Shouldn't Fear File Sharing
Re: ANS : MORAL PRINCIPLE... Mike . Pretty simple. Of you do not see that , well,, then Mike ,, you really are lost on this issue of Copyrights.
i hope you enjoyed
On the post: Joe Konrath Explains Why Authors Shouldn't Fear File Sharing
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Still waiting for your proof there.
Where did you get your Phd ?
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
Re: Christian Engström
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The rest are slime and have parrots crapping on their shoulders.
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why did he explain copyright as a natural right in the Federalist
YOU: Find me one person in this thread who believes differently. It ain't me, that's for sure.
ME: This is getting surreal Karl. The only people in the world , who want to abolish copy right & Patent LAW are all AND ONLY certain techdirt readers. Maybe a few hundred in the whole world. Mostly Anonymous Cowards.
Anonymous Coward do not make or judge the law.
Think man. think.
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
Re: Re: Why did he explain copyright as a natural right in the Federalist
You really gotta sharpen your critical thinking Karl.
Do you work for a living ? What do you do?
It is math based?
It cannot be journalism. You would be fired. Unless you worked for Fox. ( Or maybe techdirt :) )
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
Re: Re: Why did he explain copyright as a natural right in the Federalist
It is a philosophical question, and unresolvable, except academically ,, but people will reach different conclusions there. A good proff with grade based on how well you express your view,, not weather they agree with you.
Law ---in practical application --is not philosophical .
Piracy is illegal.
Whether land , sea. or online
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
Re: Re: Copyright Law in the U.S.
reply :I WORK FOR ME.
--------------------------
very sloppy replies by you here Karl.
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
Re: Re: Copyright Law in the U.S.
===========================
The primary goal of copyright is not to reward authors, but "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts."
- Justice O'Connor, from the majority opinion in Feist v. Rural
------------------
Do some more research Karl :
search : "the "moral" rights of authors"
http://www.google.com/search?q=the++%22moral%22+rights+of+authors&ie=utf-8&oe=utf- 8&aq=t&client=firefox-a&rlz=1R1GPMD_en___US361
------------
please remember in 1834. (...) The Federal Supreme Court,, was also supporting slavery.
Karl , you are too quick and sloppy with your replies. You can do better.
You are smart. Read more critically and more objectively.
Now you read everything with an agenda. Accept times you may be wrong.
On the post: Joe Konrath Explains Why Authors Shouldn't Fear File Sharing
362 Comments
Can Someone Explain Why Circumvention For Non-Infringing Purposes Is Illegal?
On the post: Joe Konrath Explains Why Authors Shouldn't Fear File Sharing
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright infringement is a moral issue.
Please take a civil liberties class. Turn those ans. in on the final.
On the post: Joe Konrath Explains Why Authors Shouldn't Fear File Sharing
Re: Konrath's proclamations that no amount of legislation, enforcement, or DRM will prevent human nature from making piracy the eventual victor are not wholly true. In many domains, piracy can be largely curbed through all these things. Large businesses d
Supposition w/o facts . It is "Pirate Logic " .
( Wasn't that a "Steely Dan" album? :) )
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
Re: Re: Re:
Pirates also hijack ships of the coast of Somalia
Why do you thing they are called "Pirates"?
They are not called, " nice People who respect the rights of others according to U.S. and international law."
The "Pirate party " is an unjust cause.
It is fueled by too much coffee , too much meth ,and other chemical drugs that pollute your moral judgment. It will not go far. Trust me.
(Smoke weed man !! Make Peace ! hug a tree. Go to the Gulf and clean some oil up.)
History is not on the Pirate side.
President Thomas Jefferson would hate you , and would use force to stop you from Pirating.
On the post: ABA Journal Highlights How The Music Industry Is Thriving And How Copyright Might Not Be That Important
Anonymous Coward
On the post: Joe Konrath Explains Why Authors Shouldn't Fear File Sharing
ANS : MORAL PRINCIPLE... Mike . Pretty simple. Of you do not see that , well,, then Mike ,, you really are lost on this issue of Copyrights.
I am not "baiting you" or doing a "rope-a-dope" here.
I really want to know what you think on this point.
Debates with out resolution ,, is like a song that never ends ,,
Or to quote Robin Williams : Sex w/o orgasm ?!?!?
What is the point?
On the post: Joe Konrath Explains Why Authors Shouldn't Fear File Sharing
Re: Re: With a response like that I wouldn't be surprised if you weren't nameless one's alt or something. Or maybe angry dude is his alt. I've always suspected he is just trolling these comment threads
Or maybe review you high school "social studies" notes.
Next >>