So let me get this straight: You are against censorship and cancelling........unless you don't like the people speaking and you don't like what they are saying.
[First-Amendment-despising restless94110 projects facts not in evidence]
So using Section 230 (federal law) to silence people
If that wasn't solely a demented hallucination that not only has never, but could never happen in the real world, then maybe you almost could have had a point there.
Using the FAA's bullshit metrics they cooked up to pretend in bad faith that 5G would cause an issue, Wireless Avionics Intra-Communications (WAIC) systems would supposedly be causing planes to be dropping out of the sky as we speak, as it operates
in frequency bands closer to radio altimeters than 5G
at total power level comparable to 5G base stations
with antennas, unlike 5G, pointed directly at the aircraft.
On the post: Totally Bogus DMCA Takedowns From Giant Publishers Completely Nuke Book Review Blog Off The Internet
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Were you planning on proving anything other than that you're illiterate?
On the post: Totally Bogus DMCA Takedowns From Giant Publishers Completely Nuke Book Review Blog Off The Internet
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Says the only one here wearing big squeaky shoes and a round red nose.
On the post: DirecTV Finally Dumps OAN, Limiting The Conspiracy And Propaganda Channel's Reach
Re: Re: Dumbfuckicus the Stonin'
[Hallucinates facts completely contrary to anything and everything in reality]
On the post: DirecTV Finally Dumps OAN, Limiting The Conspiracy And Propaganda Channel's Reach
Re: Stunning
[First-Amendment-despising restless94110 projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: DirecTV Finally Dumps OAN, Limiting The Conspiracy And Propaganda Channel's Reach
Re: Proof
Further proof of right-whingers' illiteracy:
Once again using "censorship" when what they're describing is actually "capitalism."
On the post: DirecTV Finally Dumps OAN, Limiting The Conspiracy And Propaganda Channel's Reach
Re: Dumbassicus the Roman
[Hallucinates facts not in evidence]
On the post: Totally Bogus DMCA Takedowns From Giant Publishers Completely Nuke Book Review Blog Off The Internet
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If that wasn't solely a demented hallucination that not only has never, but could never happen in the real world, then maybe you almost could have had a point there.
On the post: Airline CEOs Freak Out Over 5G Despite Limited Evidence Of Real World Harm
Re:
Translation:
LittleCupcakes shows no sign of lowering their hallucinogen intake.
On the post: Airline CEOs Freak Out Over 5G Despite Limited Evidence Of Real World Harm
Re: If you don't understand radio please go back to the small ta
Just because the article mentions airlines, doesn't mean you need to announce your departure.
On the post: Totally Bogus DMCA Takedowns From Giant Publishers Completely Nuke Book Review Blog Off The Internet
Re:
Thst's a bit of an awkward statement, seeing as how "AT$T dropping OANN is censorship!" and "thinks" are mutually exclusive.
On the post: Airline CEOs Freak Out Over 5G Despite Limited Evidence Of Real World Harm
Using the FAA's bullshit metrics they cooked up to pretend in bad faith that 5G would cause an issue, Wireless Avionics Intra-Communications (WAIC) systems would supposedly be causing planes to be dropping out of the sky as we speak, as it operates
On the post: PUBG Corp. At It Again: Sues Garena, Apple, And Google For Copyright Infringement Over 'Free Fire' App
Re:
This, kids, is what's known as a "rhetorical" question.
On the post: PUBG Corp. At It Again: Sues Garena, Apple, And Google For Copyright Infringement Over 'Free Fire' App
Re: Re:
Therefore, as per your own definition, it is real forward movement.
On the post: The World Handled A 'Wordle' Ripoff Just Fine Without Any IP Action
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
3D models in webpages? That's so early 2000s.
On the post: The World Handled A 'Wordle' Ripoff Just Fine Without Any IP Action
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[Hallucinates facts not in reality]
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Re: Re: Re: Re: Doing others job
[Projects facts not in evidence]
On the post: [UPDATE] Elizabeth Warren Is NOT Cosponsoring A Bill To Repeal 230
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[Hallucinates facts not in evidence]
On the post: US Court To Gruyere Cheese People: No, You Can't Ban People From Calling Their Cheese Gruyere If They Aren't Your Neighbors
Re: Re: A bit late
No.
On the post: US Court To Gruyere Cheese People: No, You Can't Ban People From Calling Their Cheese Gruyere If They Aren't Your Neighbors
It's not a coup unless it happened in the Coup d'Etat region of France.
Otherwise, it's just sparkling insurrection.
On the post: [UPDATE] Elizabeth Warren Is NOT Cosponsoring A Bill To Repeal 230
Re:
Section 230 has absolutely nothing to do with copyright in any way, so no.
Next >>