Ever since the advent of news aggregation (Google News, Yahoo! News, etc.) there has not been a newspaper or magazine whose front page has been able to reclaim the status of 'Front Door' or 'Starting Point' for my news consumption.
Even those magazine that I do subscribe to, I never read every article in them. They are more useful to me when their content is accessible from many entry points and aggregation sites.
By transitioning to an app-format publication, these publishers are making the assumption that I consider them my starting point.
Personally, I would prefer to see a (I know, dreaming...) micropayment network that would allow me to access my content on multiple devices and via multiple aggregators (including RSS feeds with Netvibes/Google Reader).
While I regret the chilling effect this will have on the sharing of information between diplomats, I too would prefer to err on the side of too much exposure:
"The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter."
In the future, military planners must assume that they will not be able to enforce secrecy to the extent that they've historically done. Given the proliferation of communication mechanisms (email, IM, social network, USB thumb drives), it will be impossible to prevent illegal releases of information.
Excellent point. In the years I spent at Motorola developing mobile phone software, we launched several (mostly for European markets) phones with front-facing cameras for video calling. Not one of them led to widespread adoption.
But the ability to quickly/temporarily 'show something to the other person' could open up all sorts of compelling uses in medicine, technical support, etc.
To be useful, it would require being able to turn the camera on/off easily during the call ("Just a sec, let me show you what I see...") and to use both front and rear cameras.
Although I know this is just wishful thinking...but the insurance industry could play a powerful role. Imagine if your driver's insurance carried a clause that stated:
- No coverage will be provided if it can be shown that a mobile communication device was in use at the time of (or within X seconds) the incident.
In other words: If you were talking, texting, or browsing when the accident occurred, your insurance company would provide you with no coverage.
It would not force people to modify their behaviors, but it would provide a very powerful incentive to behave in accordance with your best financial interests.
I disagree about the inapplicability of the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions to CAPTACHA.
The anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA was intended to criminalize attempts to remove or bypass any security scheme from a digital product in order to gain unlawful access to a product.
This has been applied to the reverse engineering of hardware and software in the last few years. Although originally intended to protect entertainment media (music, movies, books), there is no reason the protections could not in principle be extended to a service such as Craigslist.com.
And their legality in the US (apparently, they are legal):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resale_price_maintenance
A manufacturer is allowed to contractually stipulate minimum prices charged by their retailers/resellers.
I was recently engaged in a long-winded comment thread on Doug Preston's new book, "Impact" in which some Amazon customers decided to use the book rating to protest just this problem:
He says "I just write the books" in his retort, which I take to be truthful (at least until proven otherwise).
I instead directed people to use the discussion forum for the book instead, where several other Amazon.com customers had already voiced their anger over the delay of the Kindle edition.
I still stand by my position - that book ratings should not be used as a form of protest against the book. Unless and until it can be shown that the author does have control over the timing, I do not thing their works should be punished.
Hopefully, Rhapshody.com will continue to flourish
In light of some services like MOG, Lala and Spotify, I am a bit unsure of Rhapsody.com's future. That being said, for about $10 a month I have on-demand access to a library of abour 6,000,000 tracks. And when I combine it with my Logitech Squeezebox, I can pipe that directly to home stereo equipment.
If they do release their Android app (in beta now) for streaming audio, I'll be in geek heaven.
So despite many of their shortcomings, I would be very disappointed if Rhapsody.com were to fade into oblivion like so many of the earlier Real.com initiatives.
I'm glad to hear that I am not the only person who follows that practice - block everything by default, and un-block selectively on those sites I enjoy where the ads are their only source of revenue, or where the ads are not obtrusive.
However, I suspect we are in the minority. Once a user installs AdBlock Plus (or AdThwart on Chrome), it probably remains 'enabled' everywhere, all the time.
Thanks for pointing this one out to us Mike - a nice find. I especially enjoyed the grim-sounding names that were used to describe each phase of the lifecycle :)
Google isn't making a huge mistake - they are just helping to speed up the inevitable outcome. News Corp. and others are going to implement paywalls of one form or another no matter what Google does. Despite the general consensus that it is a 'bad idea', what Google is doing will all some of that contact to still appear in Google search results despite those paywalls.
Google is, as a good for-profit business should, acting in its own self-interest.
FWIW, here is the quick letter I just dashed off the Senator Feinstein, my elected representative:
Drop your proposed amendment to the Federal Journalism Shield Law!
S. Feinstein:
You have recently sponsored an amendment with S. Durbin that would strip non-professional journalists of the same level of protections that are enjoyed by paid journalists working for 'recognized' media companies.
Consider the citizen of a small town who is investigating fraud at the level of their local city council. What are the chances that an 'officially recognized' media company or 'officially licensed journalist' will cover the story? If that citizen then writes up her findings on her own weblog, should she be denied the same protections?
With the rapid shift of the work of journalism from old-media to new-media, it is more important than ever to be inclusive. We need more people, not fewer, to consider themselves journalists and to be confident that they will not be safe in the ability to publish - via email, on a personal weblog, via Facebook, and Twitter - their findings.
Please drop support of your amendment! You should be looking for ways to promote citizen participation in the world around them, not thwarting it.
Both academic and public librarians just need to understand where and how the provide value to their customers:
Travel Agents: They once thought their only value was to enable access to the back-end ticketing and booking systems for air, hotel and car rental. Wrong.
Real Estate Agents: Once thought that their only value was providing access to listing databases to help clients search for homes that are on the market. Wrong.
Librarians: Need to think hard about where they can continue to provide value in a world where the access costs to books and other media is shrinking. A librarian who thinks that their only role is providing access to expensive books, they are on a path to extinction.
Services like children's reading programs, puppet shows, and yes - free internet access for low income users - are all part of that value chain. The migration path librarians is all about focusing on where they add real value.
I'm sure there are some smarties in that bunch who'll figure it out.
If you want to gauge just how obsolete libraries have become in your community, try this experiment:
Show up at the next city council meeting and demand that all library funding be withheld on the grounds that they have been rendered obsolete. Just remember to wear a bullet-proof vest when you do.
Although people like me and you may not have set foot in a library since we were children, they are still seen as very useful and cost-effective (in terms of return on educational investment over the long term) resources in many communities.
On the post: As Predicted: iPad Magazine Subscriber Numbers Plummeting
The 'Front Door' problem
Even those magazine that I do subscribe to, I never read every article in them. They are more useful to me when their content is accessible from many entry points and aggregation sites.
By transitioning to an app-format publication, these publishers are making the assumption that I consider them my starting point.
Personally, I would prefer to see a (I know, dreaming...) micropayment network that would allow me to access my content on multiple devices and via multiple aggregators (including RSS feeds with Netvibes/Google Reader).
On the post: Why The Wikileaks Document Release Is Key To A Functioning Democracy
Re: Re:
"The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter."
--Thomas Jefferson to Edward Carrington, 1787.
On the post: Clueless Commentators Think That It's Possible To Stop Wikileaks
Re: More danger from within
http://www.cato.org/dailypodcast/podcast-archive.php?podcast_id=1212
In the future, military planners must assume that they will not be able to enforce secrecy to the extent that they've historically done. Given the proliferation of communication mechanisms (email, IM, social network, USB thumb drives), it will be impossible to prevent illegal releases of information.
On the post: After 46 Years Of Unfulfilled Hype And Promises, Is Video Calling Finally Ready?
Re: facing the wrong way
But the ability to quickly/temporarily 'show something to the other person' could open up all sorts of compelling uses in medicine, technical support, etc.
To be useful, it would require being able to turn the camera on/off easily during the call ("Just a sec, let me show you what I see...") and to use both front and rear cameras.
On the post: Can Oprah Do What Driving-While-Yakking Laws Can't?
A straight-forward market-based solution
- No coverage will be provided if it can be shown that a mobile communication device was in use at the time of (or within X seconds) the incident.
In other words: If you were talking, texting, or browsing when the accident occurred, your insurance company would provide you with no coverage.
It would not force people to modify their behaviors, but it would provide a very powerful incentive to behave in accordance with your best financial interests.
Just a thought.
On the post: Is A Captcha DRM? Craigslist Wins Default Judgment Claiming Yes
Re: Talk about a misnomer...
The anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA was intended to criminalize attempts to remove or bypass any security scheme from a digital product in order to gain unlawful access to a product.
This has been applied to the reverse engineering of hardware and software in the last few years. Although originally intended to protect entertainment media (music, movies, books), there is no reason the protections could not in principle be extended to a service such as Craigslist.com.
Or so I think. But I am not a lawyer.
On the post: Is A Captcha DRM? Craigslist Wins Default Judgment Claiming Yes
Re: Craigslist
While I do agree that in some cases, litigation can be an indicator of desperation, Craigslist.com is by no means desperate or failing.
On the post: The US Postal Service's Business Model Is Outdated. Is It Time To Wind It Down Or Privatize It?
Universal Service Obligation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postal_Service#Universal_Service_Obligation_and_m onopoly_status
It was part of the bargain they got when the USPS was granted a monopoly status exemption.
On the post: South Butt Responds To North Face As Only It Could
That was enough to get me to buy a t-shirt
http://www.shop.thesouthbutt.net/main.sc
On the post: Amazon, Macmillan Fight Over Ebook Prices; After Amazon Removes Macmillan Titles, It Caves To Higher Prices
For more info on Resale Price Minimums
On the post: Kindle Fans Punish Publisher For Delaying Ebook Releases By Giving Books One-Star Reviews
Douglas Preston and "Impact"
http://www.amazon.com/review/R1G9LV42GCIAEW/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm
I decided to protest the use of ratings - which are meant to indicate how much you enjoyed the book. Then the author himself got involved:
http://www.amazon.com/review/R1G9LV42GCIAEW/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&cdMsgNo= 11&cdPage=2&cdSort=oldest&cdMsgID=MxLU8JOYU0STNB#MxLU8JOYU0STNB
He says "I just write the books" in his retort, which I take to be truthful (at least until proven otherwise).
I instead directed people to use the discussion forum for the book instead, where several other Amazon.com customers had already voiced their anger over the delay of the Kindle edition.
I still stand by my position - that book ratings should not be used as a form of protest against the book. Unless and until it can be shown that the author does have control over the timing, I do not thing their works should be punished.
On the post: Rob Glaser Leaving RealNetworks; A Chance To Reflect On How Being Anti-Consumer Fails In The Long Run
Hopefully, Rhapshody.com will continue to flourish
If they do release their Android app (in beta now) for streaming audio, I'll be in geek heaven.
So despite many of their shortcomings, I would be very disappointed if Rhapsody.com were to fade into oblivion like so many of the earlier Real.com initiatives.
On the post: As ISPs Look To Charge Per Byte... How Accurate Are Their Meters?
Re: Ridiculous
On the post: Google Explains Why Ad Blockers Aren't A Problem
Re: Ad disabled when warranted
I'm glad to hear that I am not the only person who follows that practice - block everything by default, and un-block selectively on those sites I enjoy where the ads are their only source of revenue, or where the ads are not obtrusive.
However, I suspect we are in the minority. Once a user installs AdBlock Plus (or AdThwart on Chrome), it probably remains 'enabled' everywhere, all the time.
On the post: Understanding The Decline And Fall Of The Major Record Labels
Nice find - a good read
On the post: Washington Post Learns The Importance Of Fact Checking... And Reading The Comments
Re: Re: Shifting Paradigms
* * * * * johnqpublic /usr/bin/consuming-news-content
On the post: If You Make A Mistake With A Paywall, It Can Linger For A Long Time
Re: Re: Ditto on Salon
Google is, as a good for-profit business should, acting in its own self-interest.
On the post: Sens. Feinstein And Durbin Specifically Try To Carve Citizen Journalists Out Of Shield Law
What I just sent to Feinstein
Drop your proposed amendment to the Federal Journalism Shield Law!
S. Feinstein:
You have recently sponsored an amendment with S. Durbin that would strip non-professional journalists of the same level of protections that are enjoyed by paid journalists working for 'recognized' media companies.
Consider the citizen of a small town who is investigating fraud at the level of their local city council. What are the chances that an 'officially recognized' media company or 'officially licensed journalist' will cover the story? If that citizen then writes up her findings on her own weblog, should she be denied the same protections?
With the rapid shift of the work of journalism from old-media to new-media, it is more important than ever to be inclusive. We need more people, not fewer, to consider themselves journalists and to be confident that they will not be safe in the ability to publish - via email, on a personal weblog, via Facebook, and Twitter - their findings.
Please drop support of your amendment! You should be looking for ways to promote citizen participation in the world around them, not thwarting it.
Regards,
Jason L. Buberel
On the post: Oh No! Nobody Reads! Oh No! It's Too Cheap For Everyone To Read!
Re: Brilliant
Travel Agents: They once thought their only value was to enable access to the back-end ticketing and booking systems for air, hotel and car rental. Wrong.
Real Estate Agents: Once thought that their only value was providing access to listing databases to help clients search for homes that are on the market. Wrong.
Librarians: Need to think hard about where they can continue to provide value in a world where the access costs to books and other media is shrinking. A librarian who thinks that their only role is providing access to expensive books, they are on a path to extinction.
Services like children's reading programs, puppet shows, and yes - free internet access for low income users - are all part of that value chain. The migration path librarians is all about focusing on where they add real value.
I'm sure there are some smarties in that bunch who'll figure it out.
On the post: Oh No! Nobody Reads! Oh No! It's Too Cheap For Everyone To Read!
Re: Re: Re: libraries obsolete = librarians obsolete
If you want to gauge just how obsolete libraries have become in your community, try this experiment:
Show up at the next city council meeting and demand that all library funding be withheld on the grounds that they have been rendered obsolete. Just remember to wear a bullet-proof vest when you do.
Although people like me and you may not have set foot in a library since we were children, they are still seen as very useful and cost-effective (in terms of return on educational investment over the long term) resources in many communities.
Next >>