We will just gloss over that the 2nd Amendment says "unless the government is afraid of you, and determines that you don't get this particular right, or any other right that the Constitution directly says we the government must not infringe upon".
Using the great little browser add on, Greenhouse, lets see why some of these "representatives" are saying what they are saying:
Bob Latta's #2 donor, at $80K is ... wait for it ... telecom!
Greg Waldon's #1 Donor at $183K is ... shocking ... telecom!
So, who are they representing? Not you dear voter, but the people that cut the checks. Shockingly enough, old Greg's #3 Donor, at $152K is TV/Movies... I wonder what his stance on copywrong is?
Here is an idea, any ISP that doesn't have a minimum of 1 gigabyte connection offered at < $100 per month, all in (no "fees" or other extra charges) is a common carrier. This means if there is one house in the area that they "serve" that can not get this rate/price point, the entire area is regulated as a common carrier.
This would spur actual growth of real internet, not the current crop of make-believe, pass-by counts as good enough, and give the carriers the option of being common, or uncommon.
As I see it, if they have done nothing wrong, what do they have to fear? Isn't that what they say when they are smashing in car windows to do warrantless searches? What are you afraid of if you have nothing to hide, Mr. Policeman?
Would TOR help the Ugandans? No higher bandwidth, no paying for a VPN? I would use my Google Fiber and Linux box power to help run an exit node for them if it would help. If We the People just band together, like we did for SOPA, etc, we could maybe yank power away from all governments. I haven't seen one yet that didn't have more power than the people want it to have.
Much like other monikers created here on Techdirt, I vote that we change the name from "link tax" to "the farking tax" just to nod at a site that I discovered Techdirt on, and because I want to say "farking" all the time, and not get in trouble for it.
Obviously many taxes are described in a similar vein, with a similar word, but I don't want the EU thought police to cry foul and upset the balance of a delicate snowflake by using it in impolite society.
I have the Greenhouse addon installed on my Chrome, and looking at those 4 sponsors, I did some quick math, and there is $4,133,408 going into these 4 people from lawyers and law firms. So who is really going to profit from this rubbish patent law? I guess they are getting the best law they can buy...
What more can those boobs in D.C. do before we finally say enough is enough. I know there are many suckling at the government's teat, but we needs must cut off their supply, they are just draining us dry!
If they installed a bit of malware, that then downloaded child porn on a computer, then they "bust" (pun totally intended) the user? I mean every piece of malware I have removed from someone's computer seems to download a bunch of crap as one of the first things it does... food for thought.
Balance something not codified in law, or the constitution against something that is specifically protected by the constitution... Let me see here... I'll just pick the one that doesn't go against the highway robber/sheriff of Nottingham...
If we change the FCC to say minimum broadband transmission speed is 999mbs, then I have no problem with the law, as written. Make sure that is average throughput, not "up to", and I'm good.
They didn't file the paperwork properly. Just write it in as part of the policy, then charge the paperwork fees back to the commissioner, as a legitimate cost of doing business. (Sorry to badly paraphrase Frank Herbert's Dune)
Is this yet another case of Felony Interference with a Business Model?
Seems like Uber and Lyft are facing the same battles that others are fighting against the big studios. Interesting how hard the buggy whip manufacturers fight against the flying cars.
On the post: FBI Asks To Perform An Intrusive Search Of A Phone For Evidence It Doesn't Need From A Device That Probably Doesn't Belong To The Suspect
Guns
We will just gloss over that the 2nd Amendment says "unless the government is afraid of you, and determines that you don't get this particular right, or any other right that the Constitution directly says we the government must not infringe upon".
On the post: PACER, Or Your First Amendment Right To Go Fuck Yourself For $0.10/Page
Aaron Swartz
Wasn't trying to fix this broken middle finger what put Aaron Swartz in the feebs crosshairs?
On the post: Hearing On New Net Neutrality Law Once Again Conjures Up A Greatest Hits Of Nonsense
Bought and paid for
Using the great little browser add on, Greenhouse, lets see why some of these "representatives" are saying what they are saying:
Bob Latta's #2 donor, at $80K is ... wait for it ... telecom!
Greg Waldon's #1 Donor at $183K is ... shocking ... telecom!
So, who are they representing? Not you dear voter, but the people that cut the checks. Shockingly enough, old Greg's #3 Donor, at $152K is TV/Movies... I wonder what his stance on copywrong is?
Here is an idea, any ISP that doesn't have a minimum of 1 gigabyte connection offered at < $100 per month, all in (no "fees" or other extra charges) is a common carrier. This means if there is one house in the area that they "serve" that can not get this rate/price point, the entire area is regulated as a common carrier.
This would spur actual growth of real internet, not the current crop of make-believe, pass-by counts as good enough, and give the carriers the option of being common, or uncommon.
On the post: New Laws Will Force Transparency On California Law Enforcement Agencies Starting Next Year
Turn about is fair play.
On the post: Uganda Bans VPNs To Prevent Users From Dodging Its Absurd New Social Media Tax
Alternatives
On the post: EU Publishers Freak Out Now That People Are Realizing Just How Fucked Up Their Link Tax Really Is
Change the name
Obviously many taxes are described in a similar vein, with a similar word, but I don't want the EU thought police to cry foul and upset the balance of a delicate snowflake by using it in impolite society.
On the post: Could You Design A Worse Patent Reform Bill Than The STRONGER Patent Act By Senator Coons? Don't Think So
Math
On the post: Want To Promote Breastfeeding? That's A Trade Barrier, Says US Trade Rep
What more
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
Help Mike
On the post: Another Judge Declares FBI's Playpen Warrant Invalid, Suppresses All Evidence
What if?
On the post: Stupid Patent Of The Month: Phoenix Licensing Trolls Marketers With 'Personalized Communications' Patent
Prior Art
On the post: Pioneer In Internet Anonymity Hands FBI A Huge Gift In Building Dangerous Backdoored Encryption System
Re: Seen before
On the post: FCC Approves AT&T's $69 Billion DirecTV Merger, Announces It Late Friday And Hopes Nobody Notices
Ayne Rand
On the post: Police Officers Can Sue Newspaper For Publishing Descriptive Info, Raising Serious First Amendment Issues
Balance
On the post: AT&T's Regulatory Hypocrisy On Proud Display In Kansas, Where It's Fighting To Keep The State A Broadband Backwater
Well, I see a solution
On the post: Utah Wants To Kill Zenefits For Giving Away HR Software For Free
Paperwork
On the post: U2 Claims It's Working With Apple On A New Music Format That 'Can't Be Pirated'
Brilliant
On the post: Military Prefers To Keep Its Head In The Sand: Bans All Employees From Visiting The Intercept
Thanks
On the post: Corrupt State Index: Virginia DMV Orders Uber And Lyft To Stop Operating Immediately
Is this...
Seems like Uber and Lyft are facing the same battles that others are fighting against the big studios. Interesting how hard the buggy whip manufacturers fight against the flying cars.
On the post: Former NSA Lawyer Thinks American Bar Association Should Be Equally Outraged By Chinese Hacking Of Attorney-Client Communications
But mom!
Next >>