For years now, we've been among those arguing that Google should actually offer end-to-end encryption by default (which would make the company unable to read your emails).
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering.
For years now, we've been among those arguing that Google should actually offer end-to-end encryption by default (which would make the company unable to read your emails).
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering.
For years now, we've been among those arguing that Google should actually offer end-to-end encryption by default (which would make the company unable to read your emails).
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering.
Re: Response to: Baruch Moskovits on Dec 17th, 2014 @ 7:06pm (as Baruch Moskovits)
(untitled comment) (as Baruch Moskovits)
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering.
(untitled comment) (as Baruch Moskovits)
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering.
(untitled comment) (as Baruch Moskovits)
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering.