For years now, we've been among those arguing that Google should actually offer end-to-end encryption by default (which would make the company unable to read your emails).
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering./div>
For years now, we've been among those arguing that Google should actually offer end-to-end encryption by default (which would make the company unable to read your emails).
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering./div>
For years now, we've been among those arguing that Google should actually offer end-to-end encryption by default (which would make the company unable to read your emails).
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering./div>
Re: Response to: Baruch Moskovits on Dec 17th, 2014 @ 7:06pm (as Baruch Moskovits)
(untitled comment) (as Baruch Moskovits)
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering./div>
(untitled comment) (as Baruch Moskovits)
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering./div>
(untitled comment) (as Baruch Moskovits)
True end-to-end encryption would prevent some value added feature from working...like the ability for Google to scan for viruses or offer any sort of spam filtering./div>
erfer erfref’s Submitted Stories.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt