About RayBeckerman
I'm a business lawyer in New York City. I'm NewYorkCountryLawyer on Slashdot http://slashdot.org/~NewYorkCountryLawyer/ and RayBeckerman on Twitter http://twitter.com/raybeckerman and most everywhere else. I'm the author of the blogs: Recording Industry vs The People http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com Ray's 2.0 http://rays20.blogspot.com Fairness http://fairbyray.blogspot.com Liberated Music http://liberatedmusic.blogspot.com and Ohio Election Fraud http://fairnessbybeckerman.blogspot.com. My law firm website is at http://beckermanlegal.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/raybeckerman |
Oops, wrong link
Copy of the actual summons and complaint
My favorite is LL Bean Turbo Transit
It's roomy enough for lots and lots of stuff. It has plenty of compartments so I can compartmentalize. It has a great, highly usable, shoe compartment at the bottom. It looks nice (a factor because I often might have to bring it to meetings, court dates, etc). At $70 it's not the cheapest backpack I've seen but it's within $20 of the cheapest remotely usable ones I've seen/div>
kudos on getting the story straight
This was no more than an application of the 'judicial restraint' & 'avoidance of constitutional question' doctrine, that a constitutional issue should not be decided unless and until its resolution becomes unavoidable./div>
Twitter killing the golden goose (as Ray Beckerman)
What I've been waiting for is an aggressive microblogging competitor to come along. I've been disappointed that statusnet or friendfeed hasn't stepped up more strongly./div>
It's about time we saw the judiciary scrutinizing this stuff carefully (as Ray Beckerman)
i guess i wasn't logged in
is this an April Fool's joke? (as Ray Beckerman)
Can it?/div>
Great article (as Ray Beckerman)
Problem is fact we're discussing it (as Ray Beckerman)
Projects which require insurance, such as films, are virtually prohibited from relying on fair use, because the corporate insurers will simply not accept that as a basis for utilizing the material, regardless of how "fair" the use. Either pay the big bucks for the clearances, even for fleeting references, or forget about it.
It's really unworkable, and the need for a uniform set of standards has never been greater.
By the way, IMHO... it's a slam dunk fair use. And yet, it would not surprise me if the Court puts Fairey through the enormous burden of pretrial discovery + full blown trial./div>
They sued her for $3.6 million (as Ray Beckerman)
They could have asked for $750 to $3000, and then they would have been suing for $72,000, or for $750, in which case they would have been suing for $24,000.
But greed got the better of them.
Moby is correct./div>
Dilution (as Ray Beckerman)
I think that may have had more to do with the internet boom than anything else.
/div>RTFA (as Ray Beckerman)
There is no way for any objective reader to actually read the brief and dismissively pass it off as being based on a mere conclusion that "the administration feels there are other more pressing / important cases to put in front of the court".
Numerous points of substantive law were made, and each and every argument of the film companies was explicitly rejected on substantive grounds./div>
Radicalism ... Intellectual property (as Ray Beckerman)
I do accuse the RIAA's lawyers of "radicalism". A good lawyer does not take indefensible positions. It is "radicalism" in my book to pretend the law says something it does not, to make false representations to a court, to eschew making concessions or compromises, to do whatever one is instructed to do by one's clients, to bring ex parte proceedings when notice can be given, to conduct proceedings solely for the purposes of harassment and terror. Under that definition, I accuse the RIAA lawyers of radicalism./div>
Cutting Mike some slack (as Ray Beckerman)
Mike, unlike myself, blogs about both subjects: (a) existing copyright law, and (b) copyright reform. He also blogs about how the music industry is changing, and about how it could set up better business models.
One needs to differentiate which subject he is talking about.
From my experience, when -- as in this article -- he is talking about existing copyright law, he has really taken the trouble to educate himself and to state the law correctly.
Would the RIAA and MPAA lawyers were as careful as he to do so./div>
Strange headline (as Ray Beckerman)
Lawyers' training (as Ray Beckerman)
Mike said:
"Many lawyers are taught (or learn from experience) to approach any legal issue by going to an extreme position...."
How I would put it:
Many [inferior] lawyers [of the type being cloned these days by large law schools and large law firms which are oriented only towards achieving large 'profits per partner'] are taught (or learn from experience) to approach any legal issue by going to an extreme position......"
/div>Re: Re: Thoughtful analysis (as Ray Beckerman)
Re: Re: SOP (as Ray Beckerman)
SOP (as Ray Beckerman)
It would have been SOP in the traditional sense to say the statute is unexceptionable on its face, and that any question of the constitutionality as applied to this defendant should await the trial. It is not SOP for the Government to go out on a limb and, without any authority to support it, argue that it would be constitutional to assess $150,000 statutory damages where the plaintiffs' actual damage is 35 cents.
Yes making a dumbass statement like that was SOP for the Bush DOJ. I was hoping for something more professional and lawyerlike from the Obama DOJ.
As to whether this constitutes "siding" with the RIAA it certainly does; it goes way beyond defending the statute itself.
/div>More comments from RayBeckerman >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by RayBeckerman.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt