Moby Says 'Disband The RIAA' For Winning $1.92 Million From Jammie Thomas
from the representing-the-artists?!? dept
As a whole bunch of you have sent in, the musician Moby has put up a blog post where he suggests the RIAA should be disbanded for its $1.92 million win over Jammie Thomas. While (unfortunately) he gets a few of the facts wrong (they didn't sue her for $2 million, but it's what the jury chose -- though it is accurate that the RIAA has clearly suggested it has no problem with the statutory rates for infringement in the past), his overall point is sound. It's ridiculous that the RIAA thinks this is the proper strategy:argh. what utter nonsense. this is how the record companies want to protect themselves? suing suburban moms for listening to music? charging $80,000 per song?This isn't new territory for Moby. Way back in 2003, he got angry after finding out that some of his songs were being used by the RIAA to sue people, and stated: "I'm tempted to go onto Kazaa and download some of my own music, just to see if the RIAA would sue me for having mp3's of my own songs on my hard-drive."
punishing people for listening to music is exactly the wrong way to protect the music business. maybe the record companies have adopted the 'it's better to be feared than respected' approach to dealing with music fans. i don't know, but 'it's better to be feared than respected' doesn't seem like such a sustainable business model when it comes to consumer choice. how about a new model of 'it's better to be loved for helping artists make good records and giving consumers great records at reasonable prices'?
i'm so sorry that any music fan anywhere is ever made to feel bad for making the effort to listen to music.
the riaa needs to be disbanded.
Still, we're seeing more and more artists react poorly to the RIAA, who still claims to represent them. Why is it that our politicians still buy that clearly incorrect story?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: jammie thomas, moby, music, recording industry, riaa
Companies: riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Yay Moby
Also, obviously, a musician who can be respected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reacted How?
A suggestion: Do artists react "poorly" to the RIAA or "negatively" to the RIAA? Or some other adverb? Poorly sounds like they did something wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Reacted How?
j/k, I agree with you on the proper use of adverbs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Reacted How?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reacted How?
A suggestion: Do artists react "poorly" to the RIAA or "negatively" to the RIAA? Or some other adverb? Poorly sounds like they did something wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny how so many of the artists who are becoming free of their contracts are going independent, despite the fact that all these actions are "for the artists". Personally, I'm glad to see Moby return to his independent roots, where he blew everyone away with "Go" so many years ago... I'll probably buy the new album "Wait for Me", even though I didn't bother with his last couple of major label releases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not over yet.
Actually, I read (Ars, maybe?) that some politicians are taking notice regarding the award amount and are rumbling some changes are needed as the "punishment doesn't fit the crime".
Moreso, I'm extremely curious how the jury even came up with the figure. Didn't a single one of these morons stop long enough to realize it could just as well be them in the future?
But given the jury pool, I shouldn't be surprised, as most, it seems, favors the "rights" of infringement.
Moby isn't the only one I've seen blast this decision. More and more people, especially those in the music industry, are steadfast against the ruling's outcome.
At any rate, things aren't going to change. The "RIAAs" of the distribution world will never stop trying to "protect" their dying models.
It's going to be interesting to see just how this case's ruling plays out in the coming months.
Jammie may have lost the battle, but the war is certainly not over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm tempted to buy all of them again but then directly from him, to give a message that I support and respect Moby.
But I'll bet there is a label in between that will then give that money to the RIAA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
disbanding is too good for 'em
then we tattoo em!
then we hang em!
then we kill em!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: disbanding is too good for 'em
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disban the f***ers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Disban the f***ers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Disban the f***ers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Over the past few months, this place has become a one trick pony.
For how long has Techdirt been talking about "releasing" their health care ideas? Gee, the national debate on health care is on all front pages, yet nothing here. What, you want to wait until it is settled before letting your opinion known?
You talk of the rule of law being important but ignore what the government is currently doing to various bond holders?
I don't know about you, but I think all this talk on patents, copyright and trademark is a pretty small topic when you look at what is currently being debated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I don't understand the people that come here and complain about the site over and over when they are the one's that have traveled to this site on their own; if you don't like it, just don't read it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Over the past few months, this place has become a one trick pony."
I know how you feel! Last week I was logging into an Oracle tech support forum, and I was so sick and tired that everyone was always whining about how their discs weren't working and stuff! Can't they talk about something else for a change? Like, discuss the latest episode of Dr. House or exchange key lime pie recipes, for crying out loud!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moby. Didn't Eminem say "nobody listens to techno"?
He is going to release a new album. How was that album paid for? By the money Moby made as part of the process that includes the RIAA. Perhaps if he gave away all his money, all his stuff, and went back to how he was before he had a recording contract and THEN started making comments, we would have something. Moby got rich off the system, and now he fingers his nose at it.
Classy guy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: AC the dumb dumb
Wrong. Instinct Records is not and was not in any way a part of RIAA. So no, he did not get rich off of the "system" perpetuated by RIAA and their shills (like you). Try again, clown.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Perhaps you're a latecomer who only discovered Moby when every ad, TV show and movie seemed to feature music from the Play album, but Moby is definitely one artist who didn't make his name on the back of major labels (though he did end up signed to them for a while).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA
File sharing is here to stay, shut down Limewire, there's always Bit Torrent.
jamesmsingleton.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Honestly...
Most of them don't own the rights to their music anymore...so the point is moot. The RIAA/Music industry is NEVER going to say "well, the artists and the fans are pissed, let's stop". It's just NOT going to happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Al Capone would be proud
Al Capone should have entered the music business. He'd never been investigated in the first place.
What kind of a brain-dead jury awards this much to anyone, private or company, for such a small infraction? I swear, people are completely stupid. They'd better hope their children haven't downloaded any songs ... idiots.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They sued her for $3.6 million
They could have asked for $750 to $3000, and then they would have been suing for $72,000, or for $750, in which case they would have been suing for $24,000.
But greed got the better of them.
Moby is correct.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I applaud Moby
Ars ran a story today that was great. Talking about how such a huge sum is getting noticed by not only artists but lawyers, politicians, and lobbying groups. So there is a good chance that some steam against the RIAA could be put into motion. If it is anything like the backlash of The Pirate Bay than this could actually be for good!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It should be clear to even an idiot now that the RIAA represents corporate profits and jobs for some people in the old business model - not artists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
who gets that money?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Agree with Moby, but..
You want to talk stupid? Lie to the jury and get caught destroying evidence in your first trial, then appeal it. Jurors (aka. people like you and me) really don't like having their time wasted. The massive punishment dealt to Thomas is, IMHO, deserved at this point. It's just a shame the money is going to RIAA. She's definitely a crook, but not for downloading music.
On that note, Moby should put his money where his mouth is. He has given a hell of a lot of money to animal rights groups. etc... if he's serious about his sentiment, and he really thinks she should get a break, he should pay the $2M on her behalf, then fund his legal team until they find a way to withhold all proceed from his album sales from RIAA. Let him take on their lawyers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Agree with Moby, but..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'Tard Reading Comprehension
Wow, YOU cant read, can you?
Moby was NEVER ON AN RIAA LABEL. Get it? Sheesh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Tard Reading Comprehension
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Tard Reading Comprehension
Moby was signed in the UK to Mute Records in 1993, which became a subsidiary of EMI in 2002. In the US, he was signed to V2 Recordings, which was distributed by BMG before it was sold to Universal in 2007.
If you're going to attack people, get your facts straight first. Moby was a major label, RIAA artist for most of his mainstream career.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 'Tard Reading Comprehension
How convenient that you forgot to mention all the time that Moby was signed with labels not part of RIAA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh actually stupid me. I forgot I should have added paragraph tags with HTML posting. Dumbass.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because they're paid to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"The RIAA claims to represent artists"
You'd think by now that when they trot out their tired old "the poor artists" lament, people would notice that those are not actually the people whose hands they're trying to get money into.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
video p
[ link to this | view in chronology ]