Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 13 Sep 2005 @ 10:49am

  
  

  Thanks for the warning!

  I'll look more closely at the fine print of order confirmations from now on, and will avoid eBags.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Bob3000, 13 Sep 2005 @ 10:49am

  
  

  No Subject Given

  I believe that might actually be against the law - it's called negative billing. The cable companies got wacked hard years ago for using that tactic.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Vlad, 13 Sep 2005 @ 10:52am

  
  

  It's all about the crossales

  Welcome to the sweet world of cross selling. Most certainly, online pornography was the first market to deploy this gimmick among the first in ebiz, and more and more are realizing that it's very convenient to subscribe a customer to trial offerings that eventually turn into a paid service. Many folks don't pay proper attention, they click the "Submit Order" button and don't realize that within 2 weeks their CC will be billed with an amount vaster than the initial order to begin with.
  
  Is this concept new? Of course it's not. Brick'n Mortar stores have been cross selling for ages. How many times do you walk up to the checkout line and pass by the shelves with the cheap crap? Sure, it's slightly different than to sell you a TV with the Sub-Zero fridge you just paid for, but it's similar tactics. Make the customer buy more of your products, that is what it comes down to.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Daniel (profile), 13 Sep 2005 @ 11:00am

    
    

    Re: It's all about the crossales

    or BT can phone your parents up and ask if they are interested in broadband, as novice users they say "oh, yes, this sounds interesting".
    
    next month they wonder why their phone bill is "a little bit higher".
    
    frikken idiots, surely they need something more than a phonecall?

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Bob3000, 13 Sep 2005 @ 11:07am

    
    

    Re: It's all about the crossales

    This isn't cross-selling. The Bricks and Mortar stores don't automatically add $7 to invoice at checkout then ask YOU to contact them to get the money back. The added insult is that it's a monthly renewable $7.
    
    It's shady, very poor ethics and likely actionable.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 13 Sep 2005 @ 10:56am

  
  

  BestBuy

  Wasn't BestBuy guilty of this recently, where they charged "$0.00" for the first month of a self-renewing AOL subscription if you used your charge card at BestBuy for some other purchase?

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  VonSkippy, 13 Sep 2005 @ 11:08am

  
  

  Power to the People

  You did the right thing - cancel the order and vote with your dollars. Unfortunately, most people are way way too stupid and will put an easy (and automatic) $7 into ebags pocket. Between bad politics (yeah, lets make it a law to teach myth in science class - aka Kansas schools) and just plain bad public education, it's only a matter of a few generations and America will be the richest (for a while) third rate nation on the planet.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 13 Sep 2005 @ 11:27am

  
  

  sad...

  I am extremely disappointed. I am a bag freak and over the last few years have orded from eBags 9-10 times with no issues. Now I have to look elsewhere...

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Eric, 13 Sep 2005 @ 11:59am

    
    

    Re: sad...

    Just hit their homepage http://www.ebags.com and let them know their up/cross-selling tactics suck.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Observant in Texas, 13 Sep 2005 @ 12:08pm

  
  

  It's still creepy, but...

  ... I just went over to eBags.com to check this out, and before you commit the order, there is an opportunity to opt out of the magazine subscription. It's not QUITE as jerky as doing it automatically -- and is therefore probably not illegal.
  
  However, it's still Weasel territory. I'll take my dollars elsewhere.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Carlo, 13 Sep 2005 @ 12:27pm

    
    

    Re: It's still creepy, but...

    Really? I don't see it. The only things I see to opt out of are on the very last page before you order, for spam from eBags and their "pre-approved" buyers of their mailing list.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    baggirl, 16 Sep 2005 @ 9:04am

    
    

    Re: It's still creepy, but...

    Thank you! Yes, there IS an option to "opt out" and if every day folks like you and me would read instead of blindly clicking away, they would not receive an unwanted subscription.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Anonymous Coward, 16 Sep 2005 @ 10:26am

      
      

      Re: It's still creepy, but...

      I'll opt out from using eBags.com. How's that? They've proven they can't be trusted.
      
      So, I can opt out, but I don't get my money back unless I sent a stamp and wait six weeks? From an internet-based company? Am I really that stupid?
      
      The only option I can see is that I can choose to get something for my seven dollars (a magazine), or nothing for my seven dollars(opting out). Either way, I'm out seven more dollars. Gee, I'm glad they give me the chance to choose getting nothing for my money. How nice of them, and how stupid of me not to choose it!
      
      They don't lower the price by seven dollars if you opt out, so even if I'm 'smart enough' to opt out, my purchase subsidizes the subscriptions of others, as you subtly put it, "too stupid" to click.
      
      Sure, I have an option for getting my seven dollars back, a method slightly less heinous that most "rebate" offers.
      
      I don't trust eBags. Period. It's over. I won't go back. Deal with it, call me stupid, tell me how I don't know how to click, try to convince me how wonderful it is that they take my money and give me the option to get nothing for it, or whatever you want to do, but deal with it.
      
      They won't get any of my money ever again.
      
      

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Anonymous Coward, 16 Sep 2005 @ 11:09am

      
      

      Re: It's still creepy, but...

      I'm not "blindly clicking away."
      
      It's not the subscription that's unwanted. It's the theft of seven dollars that's unwanted.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Gretchen Wingert, 13 Sep 2005 @ 12:58pm

  
  

  eBags "Magazines"

  Ah hah!!!! So that's where those two mysterious magazine subscriptions came from. I started receiving two different magazines with no explanation. And now that I think of it, I had placed two separate orders with eBags. I just don't remember a difference in what my credit card was charged. I'll have to keep my eyes open.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 13 Sep 2005 @ 1:17pm

  
  

  Promotion Explanation

  I am from eBags marketing and I wanted to thank you all for the feedback you have given in regards to the promotion. I can understand where you might think you are purchasing something you have not, but I wanted to clear up the nature of the promotion. This is a free gift with your purchase and not one that you ever pay a cent for. We thought that it would be of value to our customers, who fit into the demographic of the publication, to have a few free issues. I agree that the wording can be confusing and why you would think you are paying for the publication. It is simply a free gift from us to you that you may cancel at any time. If you cancel, you will be given (not refunded, because you did not purchase the publication) $7 for accepting the publication in the first place. We ran this promotion because we thought our customers would appreciate a publication that seemed to be in line with what they may be interested in. Going forward we have decided to change from an opt-out promotion to an opt-in promotoin, in order to alleviate any customers from believing they are getting something they did not want. I truly appreciate everyone's feedback here and want you all to know it is taken into serious consideration for future promotions such as this. Thank You.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous Coward, 13 Sep 2005 @ 1:29pm

    
    

    Re: Promotion Explanation

    so are you going to lower your prices $7 per item accordingly?

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous Coward, 13 Sep 2005 @ 1:30pm

    
    

    Re: Promotion Explanation

    whatever.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous Coward, 13 Sep 2005 @ 1:41pm

    
    

    Re: Promotion Explanation

    this explanation makes about as much sense as the original "promotion"

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    rightnumberone, 14 Sep 2005 @ 6:30am

    
    

    Re: Promotion Explanation

    "The price of your subscription is included in your order. If you later decide that you do not want a subscription to Inside TV, we will send you a check for $7.00."
    Sorry, this is NOT a free gift. And I bet my Attorney General would agree.
    It's a $7 gift that eBags customers pay for unless they can figure out how to opt out. This is illegal in my state.
    If you decide not to order, you can either forfeit the $7 to eBags (which probably sends $5 to the publisher and keeps @2, or go through a WHOLE BUNCH of rigamarole to get your own money back for being forced to buy something you never sought.
    Which, hey, let's face it, is the reason why they do these promotions ... because they know you won't go to the trouble of sending in for the refund.
    Sleazy.
    Here's what eBags would have done if they were really interested in giving you a free gift: they would have said:
    "The price of this magazine subscription is NOT INCLUDED in the price of your order. The only thing INCLUDED in the price of your order is THE eBAG YOU JUST BOUGHT. However, we're going to buy you a magazine subscription with NO STRINGS ATTACHED beause we value your business and we know you aren't a schmuck who falls for stupid emarketing tricks. Thanks for shopping eBags."

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Anonymous Coward, 14 Sep 2005 @ 6:59am

      
      

      Re: Promotion Explanation

      rightnumberone has just proven that the eBags rep, on this board, has lied.
      
      I'll never trust them again. Ever.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Anonymous Coward, 14 Sep 2005 @ 12:34pm

      
      

      Re: Promotion Explanation

      The Marketing Rep's response did not say what is quoted in your comment.
      
      Here is what the Rep said--
      
      "This is a free gift with your purchase and not one that you ever pay a cent for."
      
      Where are you pulling your quote from?

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

      • 

        cheesemasterdan, 16 Sep 2005 @ 9:27am

        
        

        Re: Promotion Explanation

        The quote comes from the original article.........

        [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Steve Mueller, 13 Sep 2005 @ 4:07pm

  
  

  Lowering Prices

  Anonymous Coward wrote:

  so are you going to lower your prices $7 per item accordingly?

  Why would they? As the eBags rep made clear, you were (supposedly) never charged $7 for the subscription. The $7 is money they're giving for having accepted the promotional subscription. So you could buy a bag, get the magazine and then request the $7. Think of it like a $7 rebate if you don't want the magazine.

  Saying "The price of your subscription is included in your order" certainly made it sound like you were being charged for the magazine, so I understand the concerns, but the eBags rep clarified that. This means there are only two weasely things that could be going on:

  • They raised prices $7 or so before starting this promotion (but does anybody have any evidence of that?)

  • The subscriptions automatically renew (although I'm not aware of any magazines that do that)

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Carlo Longino, 13 Sep 2005 @ 5:29pm

    
    

    Re: Lowering Prices

    While I'm glad to see some backtracking from eBags here, this whole "promotion" is still very odd. Why pay $7 for having accepted a subscription, only if the user cancels it? I guess it's like a rebate -- but it's pretty much the worst rebate mechanism I've ever seen. Never mind the fact they want to share my address and whatever other info with someone without making it clear beforehand they were doing so.
    
    The process was shady, and judging by the comments here, doesn't look like it's won eBags a lot of fans. Whatever rhetoric they want to wrap it in, saying they'll pay somebody $7 (even if it isn't a "refund") if they cancel creates the perception that they're charging a buyer $7 for something they probably don't want, and at the very least, haven't been informed pre-purchase they're getting.
    
    It's the same principle as a rebate, I'd imagine, only sort of in reverse -- generate enough referrals (for which presumably they're being paid) to the magazine so that paying the few people that actually jump through the myriad hoops to get their money back still allows for a profit.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Anonymous Coward, 15 Sep 2005 @ 9:21am

      
      

      Re: Lowering Prices

      Well, I think you're pretty much on the right track, although I don't doubt that eBags truly did *intend* for this to be simply a "here's something extra from us to you! Yay!" sort of promotion. The problem is that it was probably the marketing dept. that came up with this idea, everyone jumped on board: "OOooh! Cool! Let's use some fancy-schmancy data-mining combined with some free shit from this magazine company and customers will love us!", and they just went and put the whole campaign in place.
      But did they ever ASK their customers if this is what they wanted? Did they do any pilot program or email a small portion of their customers to test the waters on this idea? Clearly, they did not. It's a common practice I've seen in my own company with the sales/marketing/client relationship folks: little forethought to what the customer truly wants. They put out fires, they come up with "great" ideas, and they just DO IT! Unfortunately that's not a great way to go about making changes to an established business.
      Your customers come to your business and buy stuff because you're good at providing them with that "stuff", but when you decide to sell your existing customer's 'new' stuff, or 'different' stuff, or even just 'give them stuff for being good customers' you need to really evaluate whether your customers want or need that stuff. Obviously eBag's customers don't need or want free magazine subscriptions.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Eric, 14 Sep 2005 @ 5:50am

  
  

  Single use CC numbers

  Discover as well as some other cc companies offer single use cc numbers through their websites, or a small downloadable app. it basically generates a one time use #, so you don't have to worry about get billed later. I used it for a "Free" credit report that you have to cancle later, or else you get signed up for the service.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  spam, 14 Sep 2005 @ 10:34am

  
  

  ugh

  This is why we should be executing marketing droids. The terrorists haven't blown up anything these days, but marketing droids screw us each & every day.
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Tim, 17 Sep 2005 @ 6:56am

  
  

  No Subject Given

  How do you kn ow that the product pricing was "padded" with the $7. You might be right but dont jump to conclusions. Check prices on the bag you purchased at other sites. If pricing is similar, I don't see any issue here

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2005 @ 5:30am

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    Because they offer to return the seven dollars. Seems simple enough.
    
    They can, and should, discount at the time of purchase instead of going the silly rebate route. It's insulting.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]