IM Want You For U.S. Army

from the too-busy-for-humans dept

theodp writes "TIME reports on the Army's use of an IM Bot in its recruiting efforts. Ask Sergeant Star (Strong-Trained-And-Ready) a question ("Can I work with computers?"), and he brings up relevant web pages to accompany his IM responses." The idea of IMbots, of course, isn't particularly new, though you have to wonder how effective it really is for the purpose of recruiting for the army. Also, has the Army violated a patent with this particular effort?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2006 @ 3:00am

    lol..

    ahh... im bots... it brings back memories to the days of aol and prodigy... i guess it's time to enforce my patents, damn army :P

    1st

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Old Guy, 21 Aug 2006 @ 4:33am

    IM Bots

    Shame we cant send IM troops...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    chris (profile), 21 Aug 2006 @ 6:04am

    IM bots are probably smarter than army recuriters

    unless the bots are programmed to lie as well :-)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2006 @ 7:09am

      Re: IM bots are probably smarter than army recurit

      IM bots are obviously smarter than YOU...bet they can spell "recruiters" correctly...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        wolff000, 21 Aug 2006 @ 7:30am

        Re: Re: IM bots are probably smarter than army rec

        Since when does spelling have anything to do with smarts? I know a few absolutely brilliant physicists that can hardly spelll thier own names much less anything else. Numbers they shine with words not so good. Anyways with army recruitment #s at an all time low I'm surprised this didn't happen sooner.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          The Mighty Buzzard, 21 Aug 2006 @ 12:39pm

          Re: Re: Re: IM bots are probably smarter than army

          I might agree except that saying recruitment numbers are at an all-time low is absurd at best. This nation has been around for over two hundred thirty years and for a good few of those barely had an active military at all. Oh, wait, you probably just had your hyperbole-lock key on.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2006 @ 1:19pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: IM bots are probably smarter than

            Perhaps you could enlighten us with some examples on how this isn't true instead of slamming postes with equalivant hyperbole responses. Doesn't anyone remember what they learned in school (citing references) or are all of you living up to the American art of non-education? It would be nice to see intelligent discussion... waiting

            link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Sanguine Dream, 21 Aug 2006 @ 6:12am

    So has..

    the Army started sending recruiters door to door like vaccum cleaner salesmen yet?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Aug 2006 @ 6:13am

    Shouldn't violate any patents since people have been doing this since the days of IRC (yes, I know its still around). Bots are pretty common there and have been for a while. Since so many people are able to come up with it then its obvious and not patentable. Same with bots pre-existing any kind of patent.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Daniel (profile), 21 Aug 2006 @ 6:51am

    absurd

    its absurd that this article linked another dated 2002 ... of course its a crazy idea, but in 2002 patenting an IM bot was a *little* more feasible (although still slightly stupid)

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.