Sling Still Upset About Remotely Hosted Slingboxes
from the but-why? dept
Almost two years ago, we wrote about how Sling Media, makers of the popular place-shifting Slingbox, was upset at various services that let people watch TV via their computers. Of course, that's exactly what the Slingbox is intended for -- but the twist here was that the TV was hosted somewhere else. Basically, a few companies set themselves up so that you could buy a Slingbox and a TV connection, but, rather than installing it in your own home, it would be hosted elsewhere. That's useful, say, if your an American living abroad, but still want to be able to watch American television. It was difficult to see what was wrong with any of this, as it seemed to be exactly what the device was designed to do -- and everyone who was supposed to be getting paid was still getting paid. Cable or satellite TV providers got an extra customer (one who doesn't even live in their territory, so it's actually a bonus!) and Sling sells another box.The good news is that over those past two years, Sling (now owned by Echostar) apparently hasn't done much to stop these services. The bad news is that it's still complaining about them. Newsweek has an article that highlights how creative people have become in figuring out ways to do more interesting things with their Slingboxes so that they can watch content remotely. This is exactly the sort of thing a smart company would encourage. It makes the device more valuable and should help them sell more Slingboxes. So, it's too bad that a company that built such a cool and useful device is instead telling people they're not allowed to do these things with products they bought. Remember the good old days when you bought a product and actually owned it?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: place shifting, slingbox
Companies: echostar, sling media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Sling still upset
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sling still upset
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sling still upset
The easiest, fastest and most effective way to get a company to change is to stop buying their product. Complaining about what you can't do with a product AFTER you bought is asinine and wanting Congress to fix the problem is even more so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sling still upset
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
microsoft
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MLB Gets it
At least Bowman takes the right position from the start. Siding with the fan is, at the very least, the best marketing strategy. Since MLB is in the driver's seat for topics like this, I'm kind of surprised that's the position. You KNOW the NFL wouldn't want something like this happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: MLB Gets it
Well, not quite. That position is a change from MLB's earlier position. When these stories first came out, MLB was at the front of the line screaming about how Slingboxes should be outlawed:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060607/0826232.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articl es/20070530/003414.shtml
It is nice to see they've realized how braindead a position that is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When did I sign a contract with Sling
I've never seen any other contract that gets pushed on me, without my agreement, after I make a purchase.
I don't think that any of these type of contracts are valid, so I purposely "violate" them every chance that I get.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hence, I tried to learn just how this system actually works to establish a connection between my home system and a laptop in, say, Germany. I see many people has asked this question before, but no one has given an anwer that even remotely informs how the system actually works.
Does anyone have a cite where I can read how this system actually works and establishes remote connections, or can someone here actually answer my question? I can see how it works around my home with anyone connected to my wireless access point, but it eludes me how a remote connection can be established when away from home and my wireless router's signal.
Any help will be appreciated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Basically, it just takes your TV signal output as an input into the device, and then lets you log in remotely via software (it effectively acts as a server), and reformats the output from your tv so it can be watched over the internet on a computer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DMCA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Download video & high bandwidth streaming video sucks!!!
Download set top boxes and download portable players ( ie Blockbuster, Sling box, XBOX 360, Apple TV, VUDU, Hulu, PS3, Boxee, Silverlight, joost ) and high bandwidth streaming video ( ie Netflix ) are things of the past, only to be replaced by the technology used by service providers such as MyTVPAL ( mytvpal.com ).
Service providers like MyTVPAL ( www.mytvpal.com ) offer 1080p instant blu-ray streaming video on demand and live tv over PC Player, set top box, and I think they will have a portable device out soon.
Keep in mind also that P2P is on the way out because it uses to much bandwidth, both up and down, and is unstable. I?m refering to service providers such as VUDU ( a one trick pony ) and Joost, who latest foray into portable video on demand on the itouch / iphone is freezing, buffering, and providing a horrible user experience even on my 6mbps connection.
Streaming video is a great addition for live tv an video on demand, but at the end of the day only those technology companies like Matrixstream ( www.matrixstream.com ) will be able to support the best quality over the best effort public internet when doing a triple play ( set top box, PC Player, and portable device ) because currently where Netflix requires 8mbps for 720p streaming, MyTVPAL ( www.mytvpal.com ) can support 720p streaming a 3mbps and 1080p blu-ray streaming at 6mbps.
Keep the above in mind when considering the average person today in the United States and Canada has between 1.5 - 3.0Mbps. So While MyTVPAL ( www.mytvpal.com ) can service the majority of broadband users today in the United States and Canada in both 720p and 1080p today it will be years before Netflix can service a fraction of the broadband population in high definition instant video streaming.
At the end of the Day service providers such as Netflix and Blockbuster will have evolve to provide a service like MyTVPAL or suffer the consequences of not providing low bandwidth, instant playing, 1080p blu-ray high definition platform that we?ve come to expect from MyTVPAL ( www.mytvpal.com ) on PC Player, set top box, and soon I would imagine, portable player.
Comment Guy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Download video & high bandwidth streaming video sucks!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think Bob Winters REALLY REALLY likes MyTVPAL (nt)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why bother?
i would seem to me that if you were able to do anything with music, movies, television, or books and your device or service was even remotely useful you would be facing a lawsuit from someone somewhere that would put you out of business.
i am surprised there aren't more innovations coming out of countries with questionable enforcement of US copyright law. those seem to be the only places where you have a decent shot at getting your product to market before the big american media companies decide to destroy you.
i think it would be funny to see a country in the third world become a haven for media devices and services. when the lawsuits, treaty shenanigans, and economic sanctions fail, we would see pressure from the media companies to use military action.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Under what law? Place shifting has been shown to be legal. In this case, everyone who is supposed to get paid, gets paid... so what's the threat of a lawsuit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legal US TV in Europe or eleswhere
For me its great as I really love the fact that I can watch on my Iphone - I didnt realise that I need an app for that! But app was only 29$ from Sling Media so worth the extra money. And its a sale of a box and an app that Sling wouldnt have had if it wasnt for http://a2btv.eu
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slingbox hosting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]