Massive Layoffs Hit The RIAA: Maybe Focus On Building Business Rather Than Suing Customers Next Time?
from the just-a-thought dept
Details have been spilling out over the last few days that the RIAA has been making pretty massive cuts to staff. We already knew that EMI was cutting back on its support of the RIAA/IFPI, and it seems that with the rest of the RIAA's major label supporters also having economic troubles, the writing is on the wall that the RIAA is about to go through a major transformation. I'm sure some will somehow "blame piracy" for this turn of events, but it's hard to see how that's even remotely the issue. The real issue is that the RIAA has basically managed to run one of the dumbest, most self-defeating strategies over the last decade. Rather than helping major record labels adjust to the changing market, it continually, repeatedly and publicly destroyed its own reputation and the reputation of the labels -- each time shrinking their potential market by blaming the very people they should have been working to turn into customers. They may claim that they "had" to take this strategy because it's what the labels wanted (and, indeed, that was Hilary Rosen's excuse), but that's ridiculous. It was evident to pretty much anyone who took the time to understand the issues back in the mid- to late-90s, that the internet represented an opportunity to those who embraced it. The RIAA's decision to fight progress and its own customers at every turn has been nothing short of a complete disaster. That the group is now being gutted is the inevitable result of a poor strategy that could have easily been avoided.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The Moonlighting RIAA Band
At first I was afraid
I was petrified
Kept thinking they would never let
Our plastic disc sales slide
but then Napster came along
And I had to find a way to make govn'ment cheese
And I regret
And I learned how to suck money using legaleese!
And so we’re stuck
The business has sank
I just sued my customers
And I have the legal system to thank
I should have made it competitive
I should have listened to customer woes
If I’d have known for just one second
They could force my doors to close
Go on now go
Get Hypnnotized
Just take the backcatalog now
‘Cause it's no good in your eyes
I was the one who tried to condem
With a slice of DRM
Did you think I’d stumble?
Did you think I’d let that deal die?
Oh no, not I
I will survive
Oh, as long as I have DRM
I know I’ll stay alive
We've got all our bonus stock
I’ve got so much more to mock
And I’ll survive
I will survive, hey hey
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Moonlighting RIAA Band
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Radio consolidation lead to very narrow and very bland playlists. MTV stopped playing music. And the prices of CDs kept going up and up and up.
Instead of embracing new means of exposing their music to people, such as the original Napster, which was fantastic for such a task, and net radio, which played a much more broad range of music than broadcast radio. And instead fighting against the corporate takeover of broadcast radio. And instead of creating its own music channel. The RIAA and its members either buried their heads in the sand or did the opposite.
In business you either adapt or die. The music industry utterly failed at this and are paying the price.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Are the RIAA and the labels so stuck on getting paid for each and every ear that they can't see the enormous value of the free marketing provided by radio, TV and the Internet? Don't they see that they can grow their slice of the pie bigger, rather than trying to squeeze more from their existing, dwindling slice? Does obtaining an MBA involve becoming completely devoid of common sense, or is it just some mystical attraction between the RIAA (and their ilk) and brain-dead MBAs?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Exposure
I have not bought a CD in a long while because of their packaging strategy. One or two good songs and the rest is fill up crap. You can possibly listen to a whole CD before you buy, but in a music store environment?
I would buy individual songs on the internet if listening review was made easy. But I just don't have the time to chase this particular content, (music) when access to all other types of content is made so easy.
So I take the music that I have already bought and reformat it to digital so I can play it on the device of my choice. According to the RIAA that is not "fair use" so screw them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So Much Music, So Little Time
That's the rub. Equating major labels (RIAA) with the music industry. They aren't. If you just look at the number of independents winning Grammy's today, the explosion of SXSW and that several online digital sales stores have done well (CD baby, Emusic) withOUT the involvement of major labels - then I'd say it's major labels sinking, not the music industry.
This result was predictable. Not just for antagonizing customers with lawsuits (and usually the ones who tend to be highly influential) that made no sense (since when have college kids ever owned more than a handful of lp's or cassettes - usually obtained through trades at a local used store - not what RIAA would count as "legitimate sales"), but many older stars owe their recent success on the fact their music was heard on line FIRST - Eric Clapton went through a big lull in sales before Napster. Same with Black Sabbath, Deep Purple, Ambrosia and Asia have dusted off and started touring. The big downloads on line were bands that were over 20 years old.
RIAA can't even give Nickleback or Spears away for free.
The new model for the industry isn't a handful of superstars making millions (each) and supporting the entire industry - it's thousands - millions of individuals able to make a decent living in the music industry, giving it a sense of professionalism (v. eccentrics) and with the net, end of distribution problems.
The fact NIN and Radiohead had successful physical CD sales after releasing their albums online FIRST is proof that downloading is sampling.
The labels blew it. They could have benefitted by lower production and advertising costs. Fools.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: nonsense
any artist that is a RIAA member of supporter and
neither will I. That's about 300k no-sales at a
minimum.
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: nonsense
"Jeffrey A. Williams" is a sad and pathetic (and, franky, amusing) fraud:
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc03/msg01091.html
Regrettably, those "300k no-sales" do not exist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would celebrate
I am reserving all judgment until I see what their "official press release" says next tuesday.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's Not Time To Celebrate
A lot of this problem is that copyrights aren't considered a public policy issue that allows the public to be represented or have a voice. Instead it is considered a trade issue, with the discussions taking place behind doors, internationally with content providers (RIAA, IPFI, MPAA, etc). Congress doesn't vote on them. It's debatable if Obama can negotiate the deals once they are in place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Music could be listen to anywhere at any time. People could carry their whole music collections around with them. Music could be bought at the touch of a button. Music would be unencumbered by the expense, bulk and scarcity of physical formats, increasing "shelf life" of music and removing national borders. Prices would go down, more bands would make money, people would be exposed to more music and reverse the trend of bland, lowest-common-denominator trash that dominated the airwaves....
Sadly, little of this came to pass when it should have. Instead of allowing people to carry their collections, the RIAA first attempted to ban such devices, then restricted them. Prices have not changed, apart from the a la carte system allowed by iTunes (which the RIAA had to be dragged into kicking & screaming anyway), and they have used "piracy" issues to shut down competing outlets to their bland trash and enforce borders ever closer.
Instead of embracing an unprecedented opportunity to sell and promote their wares, they have destroyed much of their own market. Artists are refusing to sign with them, customers are refusing to buy.
10 years ago, I didn't care who published the music I buy. Now, it's an RIAA-free policy. I'm sure there's many who think like me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cutting staff
Everyone except the lawyers, I'm betting. Can't let them go, nu-uh, they have done such a bang-up job bringing the RIAA to where they are now, yes sir.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cutting staff
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poooor babies! (sniff)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Karma??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fatality!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Door, ass-print
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They asked for this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They asked for this
I think a stronger message might be to skip paying RIAA - let's see, bands earn $1 off every $10 album sold in ITunes. So send the band a $1. Eventually the band will figure out it's better not to sign with RIAA too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They asked for this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bailout
NAH!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: celebrating this
I have no sympathy at all for someone who would choose to work at this organization. There are no redeeming qualities of RIAA to justify taking a job as office staff, cleaning staff etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is that article?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad Music = Bad Sales
The music albums offered almost always have only one good song and the rest is filler. Also, when CDs where first offered they were being marketed as superior to phonograph records. That was a lie.
The music industry has done this to themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
godspeed RIAA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: godspeed RIAA
Also, it's highly unlikely that your cable company would sue you or letting your friends watch your TV, those guys are the biggest proponents of getting you to advertise for them, and your friends taking your recommendation on their service is like gold to them. That would never happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA Layoffs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIP, RIAA
Here's the deal: It ain't about DRM, it surely ain't about "piracy" and it ain't about iTunes...
What it *is* about is this: Before the interwebs, artistic musical endeavor was scouted, exploited, broadcast, and packaged by the Cartels. What the Cartels never dreamed of was a world in which the artist could reach the "consumer" (as they call us) directly without going through the Cartels' lower intestine of love.
"Wha?...", they whine as the hammer blow comes down on their ill-gotten positions... "WTF??"
What the fuck? Here's the fuck: The market is now chock-full of people finding their music through so many channels, it's like a million holes in your dam. You are no longer the gatekeeper of all that is good, and you can no longer stand between artists and their audience...and that TOTALLY DILUTES YOUR MARKET SHARE!
Kiss the "biz" goodbye, RIIA. Kiss it goodbye Cartels.
Don't get me wrong; there will always be a music business. It's just that you won't be running it anymore. It just won't be "profitable" enough.
Oh yeah, suck my cock.
- CBMHB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Who wants to bet they began filing fewer lawsuits because they were costing too much? and changed tack to just try and get isps to continue on work that benefits them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And then there were...
There has always been and still is a crying need for true advocacy for the music, its artists, creators and entrepreneurs. No better time to step up and be part of the future...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Progress
Now if only incompetent managers would stop spending vast amounts of corporate money on bloated, sub-standard, and unstable products that are thousands of times more expensive than commercial competitors let alone superior open source alternatives, we could finally see IBM reach its long-overdue fate.
Let's not forget it was IBM who conducted the study for the recording industry less than a year before Napster hit headlines, which concluded there was absolutely no interest anywhere for downloadable music.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I dont know about you but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pres Obama isn't with you
Perhaps that's a reason why the RIAA is willing to fold on its current strategy, in addition to its recent success in getting ISPs to filter (under threat of lawsuit, of course). Obama is proving to be a big disappointment in this crucial area.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pres Obama isn't with you
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the internet is an open place
Anyone that works for such companies is infected with this thick skin of indifference and I dont want such incompetent, callous, ethically bankrupt employees deciding the future of my business.
If you have RIAA/MPAA or any of these DRM friendly companies on your resume, please do not apply for a job with my company. That also includes Microsoft employees.
We're NOT a "customer-friendly company" in the same way as these organizations are.
Thank you for your time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the internet is an open place
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obama
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pres Obama
What asinine reasoning. Speaking of "actually using your brain for thinking"....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If only they would read the signposts
They should tattoo this manifesto (http://musicindustrymanifesto.com/the-manifesto/) on the inside of their eyelids.
Losers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA and its offspring and the death of serious music in Canada
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA
A few years ago, I used to buy an average of 50 CD's and 10 DVD's a year. We ALWAYS knew the labels were greedy and reaped huge profits, but we tolerated the greed.
Once the lawsuits started, I boycotted the entertainment industry. I will never again pay for entertainment. I've taught my kids the same lessons; although they taught me a few along the way too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Long time Coming...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chimpy McEmpty Suit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Chimpy"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Before we go off on Pres. Obama....
Bear in mind that the person he appointed to the FCC chairmanship is a strong advocate of net neutrality, something that is anathema to the content cartel.
This President shows every sign of being a strong leader, rather than a puppet of others, so let's see what he does, rather than judge him by the identities of the underlings with whom he surrounds himself. If he is a strong leader, he will tell them what to do, not the other way around.
I promise you, if he does anything that looks untoward, I'll be the first to jump all over him (unless of course Mr. Masnick beats me to the punch).
But for now, I say the jury's still out on President Obama in terms of what type of leadership he will show in dealing with the content cartel.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
spreading the wealth
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Government is the NEW RIAA!
My what a bright future we have!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not related to just the RIAA.
As long as these two conflict, there will always be tension regarding the product of the artist.
Of course, it doesn't help when artists purposely sign with distributors as they are the ones in dire need of new business models.
Once a distributor gets involved, all hell breaks loose. Product prices skyrocket based on demand and restrictions are imposed to the consumer, even after a legal purchase.
The United States has no one to blame but itself. These companies who control distribution have set themselves up to fail with such ridiculous licensing fees, it wasn't going to be long before the rest of the world catches on.
Now, distributors are being hit by this economic hardship, and yet, not a single one is budging on the way it does business. Instead of trying to change, it would rather inflate prices to make up for the loss.
Somewhere along the line, distributors have lost focus for the reason they exist. Honestly, I no longer feel sorry for them, but hope some read this message and learn to adapt rather than fail.
Lesson #1: When the cost of the product has been met, reduce the cost of the product.
Example: A song from the 70s shouldn't cost $1. The song's been paid for. It should now be free. This applies to movies, television, and books as well.
Lesson #2: Abolish restrictions.
No DRM. No region encoding. No takedown notices.
Let people copy the product. The more who view it, the more customers you obtain once you sell them products they want to buy. Consumers aren't stupid. Quit treating them as though they're thieves.
Lesson #3: Use the internet as a tool, not a platform to complain.
Distribution on the World Wide Web costs you damn near little. Place it once and let your CUSTOMERS help you distribute it (see Lesson #2). In fact, if it wasn't for the internet, I wouldn't have purchased your products even though I could have obtained it for free.
Lesson #4: Lower licensing fees.
It's appalling what you idiots charge others for a product use and you wonder why consumers are downloading for free? Think, you idiots. Think.
If you don't follow the lessons above, you will fail. That's a promise, and believe me, no one is going to miss you when you do fail.
As a paying consumer, I'm tired of paying prices for your stupidity. Since you won't adapt, I will by getting my products from the internet, free of charge.
Your move now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]