Honolulu Completes Internet/Telephone-Only Election

from the how-open-was-it? dept

Wed, May 27th 2009 10:39pm — Mike Masnick

A few folks have submitted various versions of the news that Honolulu has concluded a city election of council members using only internet or telephone voting. Similar systems have been tried elsewhere, but for the most part, there's been fear to use them more widely in the US, over worries about hacking. Of course, at a time when we still can't even get basic stand-alone e-voting machines to work properly, I think there's still plenty to be worried about before jumping ahead to internet voting. There is a note at the end of the article, saying that the company that provided the technology, called Everyone Counts, says that the code for the systems used in the election are available for auditing. However, a quick glance of the company's website doesn't seem to reveal any code. So unless I'm missing something (in which case, please let us know in the comments!), it sounds like the code isn't open, but only available for auditing by a limited group of folks... just like traditional (buggy, problematic) e-voting systems. Update: And already there are questions about the election. Despite part of the reason for internet voting being that it would get more people involved a tiny 6.3% of the electorate participated raising numerous questions about why... and if the technology miscounted. If people don't trust the technology, they're not going to trust the results either...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: election, honolulu, internet, telephone
Companies: everyone counts

4 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

iyogi (profile), 27 May 2009 @ 11:28pm

Internet
I think there's still plenty to be worried about before jumping ahead to internet voting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tor (profile), 28 May 2009 @ 12:00am

Trust
Even if the technical solution were to work flawlessly it might still not be good choice. Elections are about trust and if not everybody can understand exactly how the votes are counted and determine whether the system is suspectible to fraud then the technology can undermine that trust.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 28 May 2009 @ 7:19am

Voter turnout
Despite part of the reason for internet voting being that it would get more people involved a tiny 6.3% of the electorate participated...

The article states that they had a 28% voter turnout in 2007 for the same type of election. Maybe the extra 21.7% was the amount of fraudulent voters on the old system? >=]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 May 2009 @ 5:54pm

Anonymity
There's no indication of how they preserved anonymity, either. In fact, it sounds like they sent each voter a personal code to use in voting which would seem to eliminate anonymity. It's easy to come up with an internet voting system like this that doesn't preserve anonymity. Coming up with one that does is a bit more difficult.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]