Japanese Prosecutors Still Want To Blame Developer Of File Sharing Program For Copyright Infringement By Users
from the too-bad dept
We were happy earlier this month to learn that the Osaka High Court had overturned a lower court ruling, against the creator of the popular Japanese file sharing service, Winny. The lower court had found the guy guilty of copyright infringement, despite having just developed the software, not having used it to infringe on copyrights. The higher court got it right, recognizing that just because the software could be used for copyright infringement does not mean that the developer is automatically guilty of copyright infringement. Unfortunately, Japanese prosecutors didn't recognize the common sense and basic logic of such a ruling and are now appealing the case to the Supreme Court in Japan. Hopefully, the Supreme Court agrees with the Osaka high court, but either way, this seems like a massive waste of time and resources.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Blame Toyota for bank robbers!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blame Toyota for bank robbers!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft going down
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Microsoft going down
what OS does winny run on? windows? if so then the japanese prosecutors are probably headed for redmond right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i.p. maximalists
if i may add to that sentence, "which seems typical of i.p. (copyright/trademark/patent) maximum defenders."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Web Design
If the law is itself manipulative then who is to blame???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Imagine a crowbar. A useful tool, with many applications. I could, for example, use said crowbar in building a house. I could also use the crowbar to break into my neighbor's house. The crowbar itself is no more responsible for either of these actions than the people who made it. If the people who made the crowbar advertised that it was especially good for breaking and entering it would be one thing, but simply making a tool with many lawful uses does not mean they expect it to be used in an unlawful way.
Simply replace the crowbar with P2P software, and the uses with something more fitting, and it becomes clearer.
Many people these days think completely differently when it comes to technology. While the above crowbar argument may make perfect sense, for some reason when the item in question is some new kind of new technology people seem to think backwards. Crowbars and P2P software are really both just tools, their use depends on the one using them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Coming soon...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Coming soon...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Educational Information
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]