Japanese Supreme Court Says Developer Of File Sharing Software Not Guilty Of Infringement Done By Users
from the that-took-years dept
More than five years ago, we wrote about a Japanese court finding the developer of the popular (in Japan) Winny file sharing program guilty of infringement done with the software. We noted how absurd this seemed, and thankfully three years later a higher court overturned the lower court's ruling. Fast forward another two years and (finally!), the country's Supreme Court has upheld the acquittal and noted that the software's designer shouldn't be liable for the software, which has non-infringing uses. It does appear that the court left open the possibility of an "inducement"-like standard, whereby he could have been guilty if he designed the software for the purpose of infringing copyrights, but it appears that wasn't the intention at all.Either way, that's many years of this guy's life tied up in the judicial system. Already, editorials in Japan are calling the situation "absurd," and noting:
The police and public prosecutors should realize the negative psychological effect that their actions must have had on people trying to develop new computer technology.Indeed. If you're dragging the developers of new technologies to court for more than five years just because some users of the software may break the law, you're creating a massive chilling effect on developers. Who's going to develop anything that might be used to infringe -- even if it has mainly productive non-infringing uses -- if it may lead to such a horrible and drawn out process?
Filed Under: file sharing, japan, liability, secondary liability, winny