Pennsylvania Supreme Court Strikes Down Ridiculously Overbroad Trademark Law
from the getting-it-right dept
Ima Fish writes "The Supreme Court in Pennsylvania struck down a state trademark law (pdf) which essentially criminalized any use of a trademark without permission of the trademark holder. There were no exceptions at all, including free speech rights.The Opinion noted "that the use of the word 'Nike' on a sign at a protest rally, such as 'Nike uses sweatshop labor' would fall within the reach of the Trademark Counterfeiting Statute because the activity would involve the unauthorized use of a word or term used by another to identify goods or services."
The Court went farther and stated, "Taken to the extreme, even our use of the words 'Nike' and 'Penn State' in this opinion without the permission of the company or the university would fall under the current definition of a counterfeit mark. Clearly, the statute prohibits a substantial amount of protected speech."
It's nice to see courts get it right every so often. I wish it happened more.
There was also a concurring opinion and two separate dissenting opinions (all pdfs, of course). Definitely great to see the court get this right, but it makes you wonder what legislators were thinking when they put such a law in place.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: pennsylvania, trademark
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For the most part I just think that governments today react, but thinking is long gone.
There is little accountability or ways to measure anything and even when it is measured legislator often ignore their own findings in favor of some self interest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The legislators didn't think. They simply passed the law as written by lobbyists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know the decision is correct when they can't even muster
a good dissenting opinion. If you read the link,
it's something to the effect of "I actually totally agree
with you on the facts here, I just disagree with your inconsistent logic you used between this case and another".
In other words the dissenting justice was actually engaged
in school yard tactics,IMO, than a true dissent, which is awesome all on its own.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Basically a judge who agrees with the ruling may dissent with regards to the reason. They may believe the court may the correct decision but for the wrong reasons.
Now you may be asking yourself why is this important? It is important because if the judge dissents in this manner they maybe trying to help specify in what circumstances, for what reasons, the current ruling should apply. This could affect how a law is applied in the future and in what circumstances.
For instance say judge A says a contract clause is not enforceable because a law makes it unenforceable. Say judge B says the same clause is not enforceable because of a misspelling in the clause. Both judges agree that the clause is not enforceable. But both judges dissent on the reason. There is a huge difference here and one can see how this can easily affect future cases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just goes to show the mentality of intellectual property maximists and their true motives. Their motives have nothing to do with helping society and everything to do with controlling others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A taste of their own...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A taste of their own...
The Roman equivalent was ... Victoria
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A taste of their own...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Payola
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In any case, nice to see a move for freedom of speech.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wondering
Campaign contributions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
trade marks and free speech
State” with flowers, and concert promoters printing t-shirts with Penn State to denote the location of a concert"
Use of a trademark, to denote origin, isn't trade mark use, despite the analysis of the wording of the Statute and the dissenting opinions. To say otherwise violates the entire concept of common law trade mark. But we are drifting further away from it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trademark ruling
Glenn Beck is trying to shut down a web site that's named GlennBeckRapeandMurderaYoungGirlin1990 dot com because he says his name is trademarked and the site infringes upon it. Apparently his name is not trademarked, thank God, because I used it here and would be infringing on his mark.
It is amazing that Glenn Beck thinks he can get on TV and exercise his right to free speech and stop anyone uttering his name in opposition. I think I'll go trademark the word 'THE' so anyone using the word 'THE' will be infringing on my mark.
I will be printing out this page and making some Xerox's, opps, some photocopies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]