Musician Chases Down Google Street View Car To Promote His Music
from the creative dept
Via Blaise we learn of a musician in Saskatoon, who heard that Google was going to be adding Saskatoon to its "Street View" efforts, and decided he was going to figure out a way to promote himself via Google Street View. He bought a sign with his band's name, and kept it in his car. He told all his friends to be on the lookout for the Google Street View car, and to alert him, but he actually spotted it himself while eating lunch one day. After following it around for a bit, he figured out the pattern the car was driving in, and set himself up a little ways ahead and was photographed. He dashed ahead again, and got photographed a second time as well:Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: privacy, promotion, street view
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess you can have a portrait printed on a sign, and have that sign beside you when the googlemobile comes by.
Personally, I like it how in this one particular case, the government has sided on privacy being the norm, not the exception. Having your face posted publicly on a system like street view should be be opt-in, not opt-out. and in this one particular case, I think the government is mostly right.
oh, and this is an absolutely brilliant idea! Good job!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Anyway, it's the same point - any cameras that there are filming the streets are filming *public* areas. There's nothing a camera can pick up that the guy standing next to you or on the balcony above you can't see.
What privacy do you really expect in the public street?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Is it your claim that parents should have to blur all the faces out at their kids' sports matches, unless they can get release forms from everyone in attendance?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: portrait
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Can you imagine Google maintaining a file for every man, woman, and child on the planet with their preference of "blur / not blur"? Can you imagine the streetview editors having to consult that file?
"Gee, is that Fred F or his brother?"
It would be absolutely insane. Mike, I cannot for the life of me understand why you wouldn't think of something like that. Sometimes for a smart man you make some of the dumbest comments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Why in the world would you even think that the system would be "Hey, let's find every image that matches this person"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I have an idea: maybe Google can charge $500 per image to unblur your face, but first you must provide a notarized document that this is in fact you, a good image of yourself, potentially dressed in the same clothes, and two forms of picture ID. Then perhaps they could consider it. Otherwise, they risk unblurring people who don't want to be unblurred.
I would say it's a stupid concept from a to z.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Awesome Promo Idea
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
heh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The answer is...
You put the SIGN OF THE BAND NAME next to you.
Too bad this guy didn't think of that.
/sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The answer is...
You look confused
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Umm..
..I want a ban on people who don't understand sarcasm and also on those who feel the need to write '/sarcasm' when they are being sarcastic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
See him for yourself
via: cbc.ca
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You suck it up. "You don't always get what you want."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
google
http://www.themusicvoid.com/2009/12/vevo-another-failed-venture-or-a-virtual-video-goldmine/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: google
Yeah, if only Google could figure out some kind of product people want to use. Wait, what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]