Entertainment Industry Explains How True Net Neutrality Is Just Another Word For Theft
from the say-what-now? dept
With comments due last week on the FCC's proposed new net neutrality rules, we've already covered some of the filings, while noting the problems of carving out a special exemption for copyright. But, of course, that special exemption for copyright means everything to an entertainment industry that has no interest in adapting its business models. Both the RIAA and MPAA filed their own comments, which were pretty similar, and equally misleading. The RIAA's filing (pdf) repeatedly referred to copyright infringement as "theft" (you would think lawyers would know the difference) and insisted not just that there should be a copyright exemption, but that the FCC itself should require ISPs to act as copyright cops. The MPAA's filing (pdf) is almost a carbon copy of the RIAA's. There is very little difference between the two.But if you want to see an even more extreme argument, check out the filing from the Songwriters Guild of America (SGA) (pdf), who we'd already pointed out was running around aimlessly screaming that network neutrality would mean more unauthorized file sharing (they call it "piracy"). In the SGA's filing, they claim that net neutrality wouldn't solve any actual problem, and the real problem is the inability of songwriters to get paid in the way they used to, back in the idyllic days before the internet existed. So they'd much rather that the FCC break the internet in order to bring back those days. That's a bit of a paraphrase, but it's really not that far off.
The language used by the SGA goes even beyond that of the others, referring to things like "rampant looting" and insisting that with net neutrality we would face the end of songwriting. Seriously. While the SGA claims that it wants to promote new innovation and technology, it appears to only mean technology that can be used to block file sharing. It's very excited about those technologies, and not at all concerned about all the technologies (even the ones used by lots of folks every day) that would be broken without a neutral internet.
Not that any of these filings are all that surprising, but it does show how low the entertainment industry has decided to stoop in trying to get others to bring back old business models, rather than adapt to the changing times.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: net neutrality, rules, theft
Companies: mpaa, riaa, sga
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
(2)would enshrine actual practices that have led to the decimation of the music industry . . .
So the recording industry has lost 10%. That's what decimate means.
And that leads to the "impending demise of the profession of American songwriting and music composition"?
Do they even read what they write?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Know your words
dec⋅i⋅mate /ˈdɛsəˌmeɪt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [des-uh-meyt] Show IPA
Use decimate in a Sentence
See images of decimate
Search decimate on the Web
–verb (used with object), -mat⋅ed, -mat⋅ing. 1. to destroy a great number or proportion of: The population was decimated by a plague.
2. to select by lot and kill every tenth person of.
3. Obsolete. to take a tenth of or from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cue the TAMHOLE/Apoligitards(tm) in 3,2,1...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How many more freedoms will we lose at the behest of their greed!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Welcome to my Camp
Thanks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
...says the greedy pirate, illegally gorging himself on a digital buffet of products he's not entitled to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Hey, do you remember a time when the only way you could purchase digital songs was there was no way you could purchase digital songs?
Good times!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
says Mr. Scrooge, as he screws both his clients and customers at the same time while rolling naked in wads of cash.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
lol. it stopped being about getting shit for free years ago. now it's all about hastening the arrival of imminent change.
my "consumption" has become so conspicuous that if i hit play right now, i might be able to read/watch/listen to everything i have downloaded before i die.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's no better thief than a corporation.
>
>
> ...says the greedy pirate, illegally gorging himself on a digital buffet of products he's not entitled to.
No. What is greedy and immoral is taking away from the commons and then never giving anything back to it. This is what perpetual copyright is.
Rightfully, there should be a digital buffet of products out there free for the taking simply because their copyrights expired. Those were the terms under which those works were originally created.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
And here it is, clearly illustrated: the Entertainment Industry's position that as long as the internet remains open and free, anyone who uses it is a pirate. Or at least, potentially a pirate.
Isn't that the point of the Fourth Amendment? To prevent the government from treating all citizens as potential criminals?
Due process? Innocent until proven guilty? The RIAA hasn't heard of any of this stuff. If you use a peer-to-peer downloading service, you're guilty until proven innocent. They seem to completely ignore the fact that torrents have revolutionized the way big files are transferred across the internet.
Yes, torrents allow pirates to share large amounts of movies and music quickly. The same way that the interstate highway system and advanced automobiles provide criminals the means to escape from law enforcement. Should that be cause enough to put a police check point every 5th mile on freeways?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The funny part.
DMCA could be used by people wanting to take down webpages that have any copyright and that means music sites too or movies that claim copyright on things they don't have or maybe even for copyfraud where some films and tv shows claim copyright on the whole when they don't have the rights to parts of it and that is a crime punished in the U.S. by a $2500 fine and is a criminal thing so only the U.S. government can initiate the process but takedowns on the other hand are just claims and maybe could be used to take down website movies on the behalf of the public I know that grey's anatomy and ghost whisperer used footage on the public domain and claimed copyright on everything, I know that the NFL claim more copyrights then they have in fact so people could file DMCA's to take down those sites just for the fun of it.
ISPs can discriminate against video and audio streams and charge more it would be like pay or don't use it. That would hurt the little artists no?
Without a rule saying that ISP can't discriminate against traffic it pretty much say that people can do what they please and with a government leading by example sanctions on people who don't want to pay could be costly in the long run.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
While I don't see anything wrong with blockade -- I believe it was an accurate description -- when others pointed out they did have problems with it, I changed it.
Have the RIAA/MPAA/SGA ever changed their wording when they realized people didn't like it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More entertainment industry whining!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it really doesn't matter
I won't give these scumbags my money. Why should I? I haven't gone to the movies in at least 8 years, rented or bought a movie. From what I occasionally see at friends' houses or on tv I haven't missed a thing. I have started driving in silence because almost all music coming out sucks. They don't have to worry about me downloading stuff, it's not worth the hard drive space. I just hope these lawyers end up in fast food when these industries mercifully die.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: it really doesn't matter
I would be for copyright if it actually made sense. Before 1970, copyright lasted 56 years and had to be registered.
After 1970 and suddenly everything is copyrighted and it lasts for centuries.
That's fair.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: it really doesn't matter
What they HAVE rejected is what copyright has become and what the controlling entities want it to be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: it really doesn't matter
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RIAA nad MPAA are the pirates
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
star wars : episode one
"do you concede the motion......"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: star wars : episode one
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: star wars : episode one
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A le clergé perspective
Don't be mistaken; the industrialist mentality and it's constant, ever-seeking profit motive won't provide The Industry with a state of certainty unless it's either subsidized by The State, or the very legal framework and free will is removed from the equation. But often, the market decides through it's own ways. However, it seems they prefer the former to the latter.
I imagine that a better set of answers will point to a different discussion; as it appears Big Content is about to go through a relatively large industry restructuring pending the Comcast-NBC merger. The comments on the FCC website resonate of this.
But at the end of the day, we very well may have additional rights and liberties chipped away by industry apologists who are deemed "too big to fail".
A sidenote on this: Too Big To Fail subsequently, and really means: "We have acquired a blank check from DC though our use of political ties"
But you have to take into account those who ignore the will of the market and believe that creating a better mousetrap on the coat tails of legalism will bring their company to the land of milk and honey. Understand that these mere mortals, only prolong their inevitable fate.
Someday soon, I imagine marketers of entertainment product will look to the "tiers état" as something more than a missing ATM reciept in their records. Until then, we will remain living in a class system with faintly blurred lines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My thoughts
Eg : I spend however much getting all 10 seasons of whatever show at Big W. You can't let a mate borrow them at $1/night, but you can give them to him for a night for nothing (the right to rent a title you've purchased is not one you get in Australia). Go figure..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"I know you're out there. I can feel you now. You're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change. I didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how this is going to begin. I'm going to hang up this phone, and them I'm going to show these people what you don't want them to see. A world without you. A world without rules and controls, without borders or boundaries. A world where anything is possible. Where we go from there is a choice I leave to you."
Heed Neo's words, entertainment industry, or fade into the past forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]