Obama Calls The Patent Office Embarrassing For Its Outdated Workflow
from the if-only-they'd-patented-a-smarter-workflow-system dept
Ezra Gildesgame wrote in to let us know that President Obama called the Patent Office "embarrassing" for its archaic workflow process:"Believe it or not, in our patent office -- now, this is embarrassing -- this is an institution responsible for protecting and promoting innovation -- our patent office receives more than 80 percent of patent applications electronically, then manually prints them out, scans them, and enters them into an outdated case management system."Indeed. It is embarrassing (perhaps the fear of patent infringement holds the patent office back from modernizing?), but not quite as embarrassing as the fact that the patent office has not done its job of "protecting and promoting innovation" at all for a very long time. Given the number of questionable and obvious patents that it has approved, and its willingness to create massive patent thickets, it has become clear that the patent office has been much more focused on processing patents, not in promoting innovation.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hrmm, I'm going to patent that idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
See, and I guess I'm the opposite in every way. I never held any inherent distaste for Obama (after all, it's not as if he's any different than the rest, or perhaps even ultimately in charge), but I'm getting awfully sick of these so-called admissions by him and his administration.
I'm sick of hearing about how he recognizes how things are bad...tell me what the fuck you're going to do about it, idiot! And if the answer is nothing, then don't take the podium at all. And I'm not talking about mealy mouthed talking points nonsense either. Come up with a solution, tell me what it's going to be, and then DO IT. I have yet to see or hear one clearly defined action plan that has then been carried out by this guy....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Also, it's not as though he hasn't bad actual plans. It's just that some of those plans are flawed or just barely underway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ditto DH
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ditto DH
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ditto DH
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Ditto DH
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Stossel's Blog
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Patent Office is Not Alone
The copyright office is a mystery to me.
I dare anybody find something useful there that will put you at easy about if something is copyrighted or not.
Well there is one useful link I found there and was this one.
http://www.publicdomainsherpa.com/copyright-public-domain.html
Explain a lot of things about copyright and shows how copyfraud is frequent and is overlooked by the government, have a copyright calculator and a tutorial that shows that no audio recordings in the U.S. are in the public domain and even when they go to the public domain states laws will make even more difficult.
Did people know that in NY people can go to jail for copyright infringement?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As with everything else
-- William Shakespeare
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@DH: Come to the light...that's it. You're getting it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Meh, glad you appreciate the sentiment, but a lack of faith and holding our politician's feet to the fire isn't exactly a big leap for me ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In the building, there is something called "The Master In-Pile", which is a pile of pneumatic tube capsules about 5-6 floors high...
Hermes was punished for finish sorting out the master in-pile two seconds early, with the notable quote, "a good bureaucrat never finishes early"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Once again, the problem is the President and Congress, not the agency
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Once again, the problem is the President and Congress, not the agency
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The President has much more important things to do than worry about the patent office.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's right! After all, those soldiers aren't going to kill themselves, are they?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Um yeah they are, way to be compassionate DH!
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/1430075.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is a surprise to anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is a surprise to anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is a surprise to anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: This is a surprise to anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is a surprise to anyone?
*doffs cap to Mr. Hicks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: This is a surprise to anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is a surprise to anyone?
"Name one thing other than the Military, and law enforcement that any government can do better, cheaper, and more efficient than private companies."
um...health care?
Your private system is the most expensive in the world, and it doesn't cover everyone. Ours costs less, and covers just about everyone. our infant mortality is lower, our life expectancy is longer, our drugs cost less, and it's free to use.
How would privatization help anyone?
What about Highways, both maintenance and traffic management? I've heard some nasty things about the privatized red light cameras reducing amber light duration to maximize profit, at the expense of safety.
Garbage collection?
Power? When electricity was deregulated in my province, the price skyrocketed.
ever read this article?:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/dec/14/us-technological-race-climate-chan ge
"US left behind in technological race to fight climate change.
A speech by the US energy secretary, Steven Chu, shows how America's unquestioning belief in the free market has held back technological innovation"
The idea that the free market can fix everything is a form of fundamentalism; potentially dangerous, and definitely foolish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is a surprise to anyone?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jeff Shattuck
http://www.cerebellumblues.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How do you fix the problem?
But how long will it be before he calls in people to address the problem? Obviously, he has connections to Lawrence Lessig, who was instrumental in creating a marketable replacement for Copyright. The Creative Commons system is e-enabled and complete with licensing capabilities equal to Copyright.
Surely a Stanford-turned-Harvard-Law-Professor-who-runs-a-competing-system-to-the-USPTO could actually fix some of these issues and weigh in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's the problem?
Obama is making a big deal out of almost nothing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's the problem?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If You Can Keep It
When "The President" decides to stand up for the American People, rather than appease the Conservatives and hope the Dems win the next election, maybe I'll have some respect for him. Until then, I gotta get a haircut.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The IRS does the same thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fraud
As to the quality of patents; based on court rulings of the last several years, roughly half of all litigated patents are upheld in court. That's pretty balanced and suggests there is no problem with patent quality. Further, seldom do cases ever make it to trial as the parties settle out of court. The facts do not support the contention that there is a patent quality issue. Still, with almost half a million patent applications filed each year a few are bound to be issued that shouldn't. Many patent system bashers like to cite silly patents such as a cat exercise patent. However, rarely are they ever an issue because you can't enforce them without money and you wont get the money unless you have a good patent. All inventors can do with such patents is paper their bathroom walls. Keep in mind it costs the patent holder about as much in a patent suit as it does the accused infringer. Often times it costs more because in multiple defendant cases infringers will band together to share costs. Investors are not stupid. If they don't have confidence in your patent, they will not invest. It's that simple. Bad patents do not get funded.
Patent reform is a fraud on America.
Please see http://truereform.piausa.org/ for a different/opposing view on patent reform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: fraud
Uh. Really? *HALF* of all challenged patents are struck down, and you find that as evidence of patent quality? Yikes.
Bad patents do not get funded.
Stop. You're making me laugh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: fraud
There are other problems here, though - apparently, 50% of the people willing to litigate their patents had crappy ones. So your concept that such patents are "rarely an issue" is belied by the facts - they are an issue half the time. And they are costly: it costs the defendant in a patent suit a great deal (you are simply lying or misinformed when you assert that it costs a plaintiff "about as much" to sue as it costs the defendant, but we can agree that it costs the defendant a hell of a lot) to defend, even when the suit is frivolous.
Add to that that patents are an unnecessary tax on innovation to begin with (even if the current granting and enforcement mechanisms were improved,) and the system looks pretty broke.
Incidentally, the statements on the website you link to are simply wrong. For instance, the NTP patents were _not_ upheld - most of them were determined to be invalid, and the last of the lot simply evaded reevaluation by a timely settlement. While 70% of patent cases settle before trial, over 90% of other cases do - so patent cases are particularly prone to waste trial resources. Your underlying premise is absolutely correct - patent has become a tool of large enterprises to stifle innovation by small upstarts - but the solution _is_ a wholesale reform starting with improving the quality of patents granted, or abolishing the system altogether.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What does that sign outside the Patent Office say?
(Clearly, the goal is quantity... not quality.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]