Netflix Cancels Plans For New Netflix Prize As Part Of Privacy Lawsuit Settlement

from the careful-what-you-crowdsource dept

Fri, Mar 12th 2010 2:16pm — Mike Masnick

Netflix, of course, received tons of attention and (apparently) a lot of valuable research, with its Netflix prize competition, that allowed anyone to take a bunch of Netflix data and try to improve on Netflix's ranking algorithm. Of course, whenever you're dealing with "anonymized data" there are questions about whether or not it can really be anonymous. In nearly every case, someone figures out how to "re-nonymize" at least some of the data. And, of course, that also happened with the original Netflix Prize data. This was especially troubling for Netflix because of the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), 18 USC 2710, a special law that was passed after Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork ran into some trouble when his movie rental lists were made public, which made it specifically illegal to reveal movie rental data. And thus... a lawsuit was born, late last year.

Netflix has announced that it has now settled the lawsuit, but as a part of that settlement it is canceling the plans it had announced for additional Netflix prizes. While the company can still do contests in the future, it will need to make sure that the data cannot be reconnected to an actual person, which may be quite difficult in practice. This does raise some interesting questions for other attempts to crowdsource research. There are certainly benefits to opening up data to a community of smart people -- but companies are going to need to be extra careful in those settings in dealing with privacy issues.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: anonymize, crowdsourcing, data, movies, privacy
Companies: netflix

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Designerfx (profile), 12 Mar 2010 @ 2:29pm

welp
people should have known netflix was going downhill the second they forcefully moved people to silverlight.

now they're just circling the drain, really. I give it 2 years.

Oh well, mission creep affects every success that isn't ready for it, and is what is happening to netflix right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Derek Bredensteiner (profile), 12 Mar 2010 @ 3:49pm
  
  Re: welp
  Yes, clearly the company is in deep trouble because they're cancelling a research competition[!] Oh and they use Silverlight? Well that's another nail in the coffin[!]
  
  But seriously, I think the investments they have made in getting their players on tons of set top devices and expanding their digital library are the smartest moves they've made for surviving the ongoing transition to digital distribution. They've even got a revenue model around it that it seems more than a few people are willing to stomach for the convenience granted.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Nicholas Head (profile), 13 Mar 2010 @ 11:02pm
  
  Re: welp
  I don't understand why people don't like the Silverlight player; it works fine on my laptop, my media center PC and my desktop..
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Phillip Vector (profile), 12 Mar 2010 @ 3:05pm

Solution?
Why can't they offer a free extra movie rental or some such for those who opt in to being included in such plans? That way, they gain the permission of whoever provides the data and they can still make in anonymous (or at least, as well as they can).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jake, 12 Mar 2010 @ 9:54pm

The only part of this story that I find surprising is that this idea was ever green-lighted in the first place, it being quite well established that there's no such thing as totally anonymised data. Compliant with the letter of the VPPA or not, (and how did your video rental history end up needing its own special act anyway?) I can't believe it never occurred to Netflix that people might prefer not to have their personal information turned over to someone not affiliated with the company withour their prior, informed consent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Mar 2010 @ 11:29am

I thought the contest was a great way to foster research and produce a better product. I can understand the privacy issue though. Wish there was a better way. I think the whole contest makes good sense for everyone involved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chris, 15 Mar 2010 @ 6:38am

What if Netflix randomized the data such as randomly change the zip codes and other data it gives to the public? Would that help to protect the data from being "re-nonymize"? I know this would not give that true real world sample but it should give the public the ability to test their own code against some sudo real data. Netflix can then take the submitted code and run it themselves against the "real" data to give the true real world score. This way the public never gets the real data but has enough to test their code and still see how their code did against the real data.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Keith, 16 Mar 2010 @ 3:01am
  
  Re:
  If the public never gets to see the real data and run it themselves, how can they be sure the contest isn't rigged? There's no third party verification.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
newest jordan shoes, 9 Nov 2010 @ 12:32am

newest jordan shoes
Hello I am so delighted I found your blog, I really found you by mistake, while I was looking on Yahoo for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a tremendous post and a all round entertaining blog.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
willbates (profile), 12 Nov 2010 @ 3:22am

I'm usually one to be fairly liberal with information sharing but there has to be decent degree of privacy protection and sharing peoples searches with just anyone isn't really on in my book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lrobbo (profile), 12 Jun 2012 @ 11:28am

It's not on in anyones book I'd have thought.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]