Syphilis (Or Was It Facebook?) Blamed For People Not Understanding That Correlation Does Not Mean Causation

from the not-without-a-chi-square! dept

Thu, Mar 25th 2010 7:10am — Mike Masnick

I really really really wasn't going to write this post, but so many people kept submitting it, I figured it needed to be done. The Telegraph has some ridiculous story claiming, without any actual evidence, that Facebook is "linked to the rise in syphilis." Quite a claim. The evidence? Oh, that's not included. There's just some public health guy claiming that there's evidence -- without presenting any. About the only thing in the article is that (a) more people in this particular area of the UK seem to be reporting that they got syphilis (b) people in that area are also (marginally) more likely than in other areas to use social networking (c) at least some of the people who got syphilis mentioned that they have met sexual partners via Facebook.

So, yes, you have a bit of weak correlation combined with self-selected anecdotal bias. And that proves what? Uh, absolutely nothing. So, please, for the sake of the sanity of statisticians everywhere, please learn to practice safe statistics, where before you claim something is linked to something else, you actually use "protection" in the form of some real data.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: causation, correlation, social networks, statistics, syphilis, uk

41 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Marcel de Jong (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 6:40am

statiticsyphilis
Hmm perhaps that pub(l)ic health guy was having trouble distinguishing between the two, because he suffers from 'statiticsyphilis', could have been 'numbersgonorrhea' too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pixelation, 25 Mar 2010 @ 7:20am

Internet condom
Please don your internet condoms before plugging into the net. We'll all be safer.
Is there an AV program for this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- senshikaze (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 9:19am
  
  Re: Internet condom
  I call it Linux.
  
  (sorry, i had to :) )
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DCX2, 25 Mar 2010 @ 10:53am
  
  Re: Internet condom
  Darn kids, quit setting your wireless card to Promiscuous mode and get off my LAN!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Dan (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 7:21am

I like Facebook's response
One of the lines from the Facebook spokesperson quoted in the article:
"Facebook is no more responsible for STD transmission than newspapers responsible for bad vision."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- :Lobo Santo (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 7:34am
  
  Re: I like Facebook's response
  "Facebook is no more responsible for STD transmission than newspapers responsible for bad vision."
  Given the logic of CNN or Fox News, that could be anywhere from "not at all responsible" to "completely responsible" depending upon which talking head is on...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - A Dan (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 7:50am
    
    Re: Re: I like Facebook\'s response
    New study: AARP membership linked to death!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Danny (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 9:03am
      
      Re: Re: Re: I like Facebook\\\'s response
      I remember someone (perhaps it was James Randi?) once arguing that the best predictor of death we have is what century you were born in.
      
      It turns out that 100% of the people born in the 18th century are dead. Ergo, if you don't want to die, don't get born in the 18th century.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - senshikaze (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 9:20am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: I like Facebook\\\\\\\'s response
        while not the 18th century, still damned old:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldest_people#Ten_oldest_people_currently_living
        
        1895, for fucks sake!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), 26 Mar 2010 @ 10:33am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I like Facebook\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s response
        "while not the 18th century, still damned old:"
        
        Math fail. The 18th century was from 1701-1800.
        
        If you don't believe me, what century was year 1-100?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 29 Mar 2010 @ 12:36pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I like Facebook\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s response
        That was the 4th century.
        
        Stop being a smart ass.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DS, 25 Mar 2010 @ 11:23am
  
  Re: I like Facebook\'s response
  Welll... as someone who started reading before the muscles that focus the eye were fully developed, that's an argument that you could 'almost' make, and not be totally wrong.
  
  You'd still be stupid regardless.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 7:43am

Heh.
"Pratice Safe Statistics"
"Real Data is Your Best Protection"

That should be your next t-shirt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2010 @ 11:20am
  
  Re: Heh.
  seconded
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tom, 25 Mar 2010 @ 7:43am

Global Warming
Facebook is no more responsible for the rise in STDs than man is responsible for the earth's temperature.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Reason2Bitch (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 9:30am
  
  Re: Global Warming
  So, you want to exonerate Facebook at the cost of refuting global warming?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2010 @ 10:19am
  
  Re: Global Warming
  Unless you take into account the lack of pirates. Clearly you are uninformed.
  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d1/PiratesVsTemp_English.jpg/300p x-PiratesVsTemp_English.jpg
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brian (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 7:44am

Well we need to ban dihydrogen monoxide as well since 100% of people who ingest it end up dead at some point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2010 @ 8:03am
  
  Re:
  I gave a presentation in College once where I provided evidence that air was responsible for all the horrors of the world. I used every dirty trick in the book to hide, skew, and misrepresent legitimate sources (like an article from the american lung association) to support my claim. I was trying to show my classmates that just because someone shows you numbers, graphs, and diagrams doesn't mean they're telling you the absolute truth.
  
  My teacher gave me 100% on it too. :)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sinan Unur (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 7:50am

Not the first time, not the last time
It is sad that a lot more people take this sort of thing seriously when the claim is that the economic and technological progress since the industrial revolution is causing an increase in cancer etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
VoicesInMyHead, 25 Mar 2010 @ 7:50am

Ouch...
I just had to freakin' shake my head at this claim... which tweaked my neck, so I think it's safe to say that TechDirt is causing chiropractic injuries among it's readership!
Ok, I know it's really all the stupid people doing stupid things that causes pain... but in true litigious form, we have to blame those with the deepest pockets regardless of fault... right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2010 @ 8:12am

I blame that TV channel with the CG monster movies and wrestling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Marcel de Jong (profile), 26 Mar 2010 @ 4:32am
  
  Re:
  I'd like to add to that and suggest that syphilis has a bad connotation around the term nowadays, I suggest we rename it to syfyless.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
known coward, 25 Mar 2010 @ 8:26am

since reading newspapers in poor light
will harm vision.

Facebook is admitting they are guilty. Quick get me my lawyer, and a computer that does not practice safe sex.

according to the linked article:

"
"There has been a fourfold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected with more young women being affected.

"I don't get the names of people affected, just figures, and I saw that several of the people had met sexual partners through these sites.

"Social networking sites are making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex."

In Teesside there were 30 recorded cases of syphilis last year, but the true figures are expected to be much higher.

Research has shown that young people in Sunderland, Durham and Teesside were 25 per cent more likely to log onto social networking sites than those in the rest of Britain.

A Facebook spokesman said: “The assertion that Facebook is responsible for the transmission of syphilis is ridiculous. Facebook is no more responsible for STD transmission than newspapers responsible for bad vision. Today’s reports exaggerate the comments made by the professor, and ignore the difference between correlation and causation.

"As Facebook’s more than 400 million users know, our website is not a place to meet people for casual sex – it’s a place for friends, family and co-workers to connect and share.”
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2010 @ 11:23am
  
  Re: since reading newspapers in poor light
  OH i am certainly connecting and sharing with friends families and co-workers. ;)
  
  cue horrified responses in...
  5...
  4...
  3...
  2...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - senshikaze (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 1:39pm
    
    Re: Re: since reading newspapers in poor light
    hopefully just not all at once.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2010 @ 8:36am

it is the same sort of babble that made freakenomics so popular.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ben Robinson (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 8:48am

Bad Science
Ben Goldacre, author of the Gurdian's weekly Bad Science coulmn has been trying to get to the actual evidence all week. You can follow his progress on Twitter http://twitter.com/bengoldacre, but be warned it might give you gonorrhea ;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Mighty Buzzard, 25 Mar 2010 @ 9:07am
  
  Re: Bad Science
  Nobody gave me gonorrhea, I earned it!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - senshikaze (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 9:28am
    
    Re: Re: Bad Science
    hahaha
    
    best comment yet!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Danny (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 9:01am

cum se cum sa
Actually, I think I can create an equally plausible hypothesis that syphilis causes Facebook:

If people are finding that the risky ways they meet sexual partners are leading them to acquire too much venereal disease, then they might look for alternative methods to better screen potential partners.

An online system that would all people to vet potential partners by reading about them, and validating them through their community of friends might be useful.

Therefore, people who suffer from venereal disease might tend to populate such online social networks. Their use of these networks might contribute to the critical mass necessary to make the networks sustainable.

---

So, stamp out venereal disease and Facebook might just go away!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beta, 25 Mar 2010 @ 9:21am

fish and chips must be wrapped in *something*
From my distant vantage point it seems that British newspapers are astonishingly bad at science. Is that true? And if so, why does anyone pay attention to their science stories?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jake, 25 Mar 2010 @ 11:47am
  
  Re: fish and chips must be wrapped in *something*
  It's not just science, but practically everything but the football results these days. The better ones are under intense pressure to get a story out ahead of the blogosphere and other new media, which means fact-checking often falls by the wayside in the rush to beat the print deadline. The rest of them seem to have just said "fuck it" and started making stories up as they go along.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Johnny Canada, 25 Mar 2010 @ 9:29am

Well would we now call Syphilis a computer virus?

Then we can sue Norton/Mcafee etc as they did not protect you from getting it.

Also sue Google, in Italy you could get away with it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dementia (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 1:24pm
  
  Re:
  I suppose we could except that syphilis is caused by a bacteria.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
JN, 25 Mar 2010 @ 10:16am

all such a study really shows -
is that
"Tortured statistics... will confess to anything."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Really?, 25 Mar 2010 @ 11:33am

Headline: Facebook Users Prefer Dial Soap.

I'm making this statement based off the fact that everyone of my friends that every time I go over to a friend's house, that has a Facebook account, they have Dial soap in their bathroom.

Wow, what a joke..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
grog, 25 Mar 2010 @ 12:02pm

Hey, it is the perfect platform for syphilis.

Someone just now needs to write an app providing an easy way to tell your "friends" you tested positive, and leaderboards for Most Infected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- alottamess (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 1:36pm
  
  Re:
  Syphville?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DerekCurrie (profile), 25 Mar 2010 @ 2:08pm

Correlation: The most abused statistic
Anyone who has taken a serious class in statistics knows the worthlessness of correlation figures. They also know that correlation is THE most abused of statistics. If you ever see anyone attempting to state cause and effect based upon correlation data, you know right off the bat that they are deadly desperate to have something to prove. Not gonna happen. Correlation has no statistical significance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Txknight (profile), 7 Apr 2010 @ 6:09am

wear latex gloves when you check your facebook then???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]