Could Collection Societies Help Up-And-Coming Artists With A 20/80 Distribution System?
from the one-idea dept
It's no secret that I'm not a fan of music collection societies in general. I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them. That's because once they're given a right to demand payments, they continually look to expand that right: covering more areas and increasing the amount they can demand.While, at first, that might seem like a good thing for the musicians and songwriters they represent, what many don't take into account is the wider repercussions and unintended consequences. For example, by making music more expensive to play, they actually take away a lot of the incentive for many places to play music -- thereby cutting down on promotional venues for certain artists. This has hit coffee shops and other small venues especially hard, and that's quite a problem since so many musicians actually get their start performing at various open mic nights. The second problem, of course, is in distribution. How do these collection societies accurately distribute money. By their very nature, they really can't track how often songs from less-well-known artists and songwriters are played, and so they often just focus on bigger acts -- effectively taking money that should go to smaller artists and giving it to bigger artists! If you catch representatives from those groups off-guard, they even seem willing to admit that, such as the time that a BMI exec responded to such criticism from a songwriter who wasn't getting paid: "I would like to tell him is that he needs to write a hit song."
Andrew Dubber has been thinking about this issue, and is wondering if there might be a slightly better solution that would help up-and-coming artists. His idea is that these collection societies should take 20% of their overall pot of money, and divide it equally among the lower 80% of the musicians and songwriters who are members. It wouldn't be that much money, but it would give them all some money. The remaining 80% of the collection revenues would still be handed out as usual, using whatever techniques the collection societies use to figure out who gets what. My first reaction on hearing this is that it would get people to sign up for a chance at "free money," making it something like a welfare system for musicians. But, Dubber points out in the comments that in order to qualify, you'll still need to have a song that was used somewhere else. You can't just say you're a musician.
I'm still not totally convinced that this would work, and I'm also not convinced that the collection society setup is even worth saving at all. But if such societies are going to be around (and it's almost certain they're not going anywhere), then we might as well look at ways to make them actually help more musicians, rather than simply propping up the top of the top, while holding back new comers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: collection society, distribution, fairness, music
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Sorry Mike...
You either need to abolish the collection society or update them with technology. A modern cell phone can have an app installed that simply listens to a song and identifies it - why can't a bar or venue do the same?
If a bar owner pays a fee for performance rights, why can't the society simply install a cellular listening device in the place of business that listens to the songs played - identifies them and reports in real time what's being played. It would be far more accurate than their current guessing/sampling methods. It would alos be useful and 'saleable' as REAL chart data far superior to the crap Billboard and Neilson puts out.
Just an idea...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry Mike...
They could call it, Big Listener.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sorry Mike...
You're assuming only $20 million collected. You're off by a lot.
In the post above, he runs the numbers for UK artists, and each would get £2,500. That's not too bad.
In the US, I'm not sure where your $20 million comes from. ASCAP alone (which is only 1 of the 3 US songwriter collection agencies) paid out $817 million in 2008. So, now you're talking $163 million. ASCAP has 350,000 creators signed up. 80% of those would be 280,000 artists. So, 280,000 artists getting a split of $163 million... and (if my quick mental math is right) you're talking about $600. That's not anything amazing, certainly, but it's not $8. And it's a hell of a lot more than a lot of folks get from ASCAP.
But, yes, in general, I agree. The whole situation is not good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm fairly against this
What I suggest is a reversion of an underperforming copyright. Rather than wearing down coffee shops with what is owned and enforced, there could instead be smaller groups of copyright holders that charge based on popularity, region, or a myriad of other factors rather than a monopolistic license that is incredibly difficult to find the copyrights for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm fairly against this
I don't think this is true at all. Especially for the "poor, independent, unknown" artists we like to worry about, the benefit of having their song actually played and listened to is far more important than getting a payout.
Collection societies are all about shaking down small businesses for payments they can distribute to their own executives and a few major artists. Independents and smaller artists don't need them, they need to be heard. Then it's up to the artist to offer scarcities these incoming potential fans can buy. Don't expect to sit on your laurels and get checks every time a coffee shop plays your song, as if they're not doing -you- the favor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm fairly against this
Me : that fact ASCAP /BMI are "non profit collectives",, show how faulty your reasoning is.
think about it .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I'm fairly against this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steel wolf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it's better to have new posts at the bottom than in a confusing thread.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
ME : Are you a working musician??
Who pays the bills and puts the grandchildren through college,, ALL off of his/her songwriting?!?!?
How could you Mike , as an "egomaniac- with -poor --=writing-blogger- something",
For ever,, for heaven's sake,,,
know the life and struggles of a
working songwriter and /or musician??
Who the FreaK are you!!!..........
.......... Mike to tell me that ASCAP /BMI :
"abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them."
In all honesty Mike,, F%#K YoU !
Really , I have never been so insulted in my life.
For you to think you know how a working songwriter , and their collectives work form the inside ,, as "real world players"--
- living eating and
dying off the CREATION of "their music" and the "art of their songwriting".
Again F#@K YOU !
( It's techdirt I have taken it for weeks , and I saved it for when I meant it.)
Yes I mean it.
You are lucky Chuck Berry ,
and Bob Dylan -
- guys who became rich for their songwriting -- Quite Franky,, Mr .Berry , would kick yous ass physically.
He takes no sh#t for no one.
Bob , well he already wrote a song about you Mike and copyright called:
Positively Fourth Street.
The greatest , "you are really a shmuck" song EVER written.
Nice J -- O -- B !!!
BOB !!!!!!!!
http://video.mail.ru/inbox/mtchng_mol/2907/2920.html
------------------
--------------
-----------
(P.S. As SL pointed out , songwriters make the most in music.. I re-post it later )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
(usually i solicit the criticism,, that is how one grows stronger and better and wiser.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
2. When did the collection societies actually start giving money to the artists? Most of the time their take is 'held for the artist due to no accurate payment information.'
3. Your scansion in the 4th and 2nd couplets limp like a clubfooted water buffalo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
. If this is an example of your song writing, you need to learn how to fry chips.
Me : I have been songwriting for 30 years,, my peers love my songs.
You a "Blatant Coward" who has not an Artistic Soul.. Who cares what you think about the ARTISTIC CRAFT of songwriting & poetry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: . If this is an example of your song writing, you need to learn how to fry chips.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: . If this is an example of your song writing, you need to learn how to fry chips.
Painting and writing,, your ego can judge your skills ..
When YOU sit next to Eric Clapton ,, you can't fake your atheistic ARTISTIC skills.
Being a musician is like studying the "force " to become a Jedi.
You can fake out a master.
Many musicians call me "master" -- REALLY.
And Eric Clapton -- he is the "High Master" "Musical Jedi."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: . If this is an example of your song writing, you need to learn how to fry chips.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't think I'm an artist, I actually am one because I make art and have been all my life.
ANS: very true . I agree 100%. I think therefore I am.
I make art , I am an Artist.
But you can still e a bad Artist,,, with zero respect of your Artistic peers.
but only Clapton , can tell me I am a good musical Artist. ( for me ,, Bob Dylan would not count guitar-wise , ( Sorry Bob , but i know you understand my point. Love ya' Bob !!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't think I'm an artist, I actually am one because I make art and have been all my life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't think I'm an artist, I actually am one because I make art and have been all my life.
Better than being an astroturfer liar without morals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I don't think I'm an artist, I actually am one because I make art and have been all my life.
Me : lying is against my religion. (seriously)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You can NOT fake out a master.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
Here we are - trying to look at ways that would help to share revenue more fairly between musicians - and maybe help a few struggling ones to survive more easily - not looking here at abolishing the existing system you seem to love - just tweaking it a bit to help the less successful artists - and - well - just look how your comment sits in that context.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
As for your post here, you do realise you're attacking somebody for giving his opinion on a suggestion on how to improve the payouts for lesser known musicians, right? I mean you ramble on in every post about musicians who made it big 50 years ago, but never see to look at what the system is now and how is screws lesser-known artists like yourself.
You've literally just said "fuck you" to Mike because he agrees that more obscure musicians don't get their fair share of the pie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You've literally just said "fuck you" to Mike because he agrees that more obscure musicians don't get their fair share of the pie.
Me : Sorry. I believe ASCAP and BMI , do a great job for Musicians and songwriters , all the way around.
Mike disagrees, AND who cares what Mike thinks on this point-- he is no ARTIST -- that is clear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You've literally just said "fuck you" to Mike because he agrees that more obscure musicians don't get their fair share of the pie.
Good job on insulting someone that was trying to expose the darker side of the industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
Mike their responses ,, the standard mentally-"juvenile offenders
here.. show that when it comes to music and copyrights ,, You Mike at techdirt ,, know "bo-diddly-squat",,,,,
.... about being a living musician and your "prime supporters" in commentators here are worse ,, they just know NOTHING.
Fools who seem to spend 90% of their waking hours posting here @ techdirt.
I know , if I do 10 -posts-a-day ,, I feel my day shortened ,, and less "real LIFE things" get done --- but my passion for ""Copyright as a Constitutional Protection of Artist & Writers et. al. "" ---
and drives me to fight you Pirates.
Paul T, Ricahard,, and Cowards,, pyhco- posters who would debate Creation with G-D, and tell G-D that he is missing the point.
Maybe I will save one Pirate soul -- from "downloading damnation" and life in cyber-hell. ( Hell is hell , at all levels,, YOU geeks kiss many Pretty Woman "??? ---- w/o paying!?!?!?)
===============
Roy Orbison - Pretty Woman (From "Live At Austin City Limits")
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBrbpWwWafQ
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
incomplete sentences,== It is a posting board ,, i got a busy day
and liberal use of symbols to disguise profanity===== as opposed to the Sh#cks here , who write from the gutter of life
makes what you look like a jackass rather than a participant in a reasonable discussion +======= FROM an idiot like you ,, that is a compliment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hide behind "dyslexia" as a crutch.
Being disabled -- at any level -- means "bravely confronting" one's disability EVERY day ,---- often in pain and mental stress,,
To meet , defeat , and overcome , the Disability.
To turn the "dis-advantage of disability" into the "Advantage of accomplishment"---- and the joy that "true accomplishment" through "sweat and pain and hard work" brings.
Learn a little about LIFE -- will you .
READ MORE -- WRITE LESS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hide behind "dyslexia" as a crutch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: hide behind "dyslexia" as a crutch.//a lot of dyslexics , THINK they are dyslexics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: hide behind "dyslexia" as a crutch.
Ethos - expertise or knowledge in an area or personal appeal
Logos - your logic
Pathos - emotional appeal
---------------------------------------------
When discussing with him, I feel that he hurts his ethos the most. By constantly referring to others in a derogative manner, he shows that either he is a child in the game of debate (ironic with the degree he supposedly has) or else he really has no message worth listening to.
When you try to appeal to his logic, he unfortunately reverts back to the same petty arguments and insults. So logos is out the door. When he is confronted with logic in any way, he swerves that argument to one side by telling you something to the effect of "Go to Law School" or just not answering.
Pathos usually comes with being able to interact through the first two. However, the "Silent Majority" may not agree. When I read his words, I'm swayed against them because they make little to no sense and are quite confusing. Oh well, perhaps one day he'll learn.
I can't stop his responses. Just quietly disagree with someone who has a disjointed mindset.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: hide behind "dyslexia" as a crutch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: hide behind "dyslexia" as a crutch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
"abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them."
If a true accounting of what music is played on the radio, bars, coffee shops, and clubs. It would cause ASCAP and BMI to fail. I have been doing a little test with about 50 web broadcasted-streamed radio stations. Who and what ASCAP pays is way off based on a months worth of data. The top 200 should be the top 2,500 plus. The ratios of who gets paid and how much they are paid is so off that it cant be error, like most record label data its a total guess or falsehood.
My thought on this software is use it on all web based stations. Then continuosly publish the data a week or two after everyone is paid by the collection societies. It would be fun to watch the chaos that ensues. If the Performing Rights Act gets passed into law it would be a way to keep the record labels and collection societies honest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
First ... You should put that rant to music.
Positively Fourth Street.
The greatest , "you are really a shmuck" song EVER written.
Nice J -- O -- B !!!
BOB !!!!!!!!
http://video.mail.ru/inbox/mtchng_mol/2907/2920.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I tend to think that once they get the right to collect they begin to abuse that power in ways that actually harm musicians and songwriters more than help them.
Positively Fourth Street.
and this is the song about you:
http://everything2.com/title/I+am+the+very+model+of+a+newsgroup+personality
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How about this?
Once that is established each musician gets an equal share of the remaining revenue - but not for themselves. Instead they must donate it to one or more other songwriters (the honest and sensible ones will donate to those that wrote the songs they themselves play).
Sysyems will need to be put in place to catch abuses of this system (tit for tat and "chain" arrangements - legitimate I play your songs and you play mine arrangements would be out of the license system altogether - see above)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How about this?//First off we need a system
You ain't a musician,----- you ain't "WE"
Copyright is about "artist's rights" not "audience desires"
==============================
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How about this?//First off we need a system
Actually, its not about rights at all, its about a health public domain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually, its not about rights at all, its about a health public domain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Actually, its not about rights at all, its about a health public domain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"The public domain is the rule and copyright is the exception to that rule."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "The public domain is the rule and copyright is the exception to that rule."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "The public domain is the rule and copyright is the exception to that rule."
Randy Newman - Political Science ( "Drop the Big One !"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGO42gvCSPI
soooooo,, good
===========================
#
1. RANDY NEWMAN - POLITICAL SCIENCE LYRICS
Jan 13, 2010 ... Political Science lyrics performed by Randy Newman. ... from our own government will someday depend on our will to "Drop the Big One". ...
www.sing365.com/...Randy-Newman/E5E5C50CCA8ECFC048256A3700478B4C - Cached - Similar - Filter - History
#
2. RANDY NEWMAN, "POLITICAL SCIENCE"
And there'll be Italian shoes for me! They all hate us anyhow. So let's drop the big one now, Let's drop the big one now! "Political Science", Randy Newman.
www.papillonsartpalace.com/ranndy.htm - Cached - Similar - Filter - History
#
3. Randy Newman - Political Science Lyrics
Let's drop the big one / There'll be no one left to blame us / We'll save Australia / Don't wanna hurt no kangaroo / We'll build an All American amusement ...
www.lyricstime.com/randy-newman-political-science-lyrics.html - Cached - Similar - Filter - History
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "The public domain is the rule and copyright is the exception to that rule."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:The future will not be kind to the control freaks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:The future will not be kind to the control freaks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:The future will not be kind to the control freaks.
May the Force be with you !!
--------------------------
Philosopher king - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Philosopher kings are the hypothetical rulers, or Guardians, of Plato's Utopian Kallipolis. If his ideal city-state is to ever come into being, ...
In Book VII of The Republic - Criticism - See also - References
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosopher_king
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:The future will not be kind to the control freaks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:The future will not be kind to the control freaks.
As Ruler and King , of the "First Galactic Artist's Empire" :
I sentence to to a life of learning,
with no earning.
( think about it )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Actually, its not about rights at all, its about a health public domain.
"To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."
The section "useful arts" refers to the works of artisans, people skilled in manufacturing. Also I dont see musicians covered by that clause in anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Also I dont see musicians covered by that clause in anyway.
ANS : then why brake the law to download musician song illegally.
OR BUY THEM WITH $$$-- if your a nice person.
MUSIC IS A VALUABLE ART !!
A world w/o the BEATLEs would not be as nice
------------
The Beatles (George)- "Think For Yourself"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aADNhnQq-YU
listen to the WORDS !!!!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Also I dont see musicians covered by that clause in anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Also I dont see musicians covered by that clause in anyway.
--------- you fool.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Also I dont see musicians covered by that clause in anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TP , you are a liar !!!!!
I am calling you out on that one.
WHERE ,, you show me where , i have lies in ANY POST EVER here , on on my blogs.
------------------------------------------
Call my references : the ONLY complaint I get :
I am TOO honest,
Needs to be a little more diplomatic sometimes.
( My ans : tough , nice guys loose debates and elections.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Also I dont see musicians covered by that clause in anyway.
Painting is much more valuable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Painting is much more valuable.
Question : do you mean fiancailly or culturally , or both ?
I do not disagree.
but in the ARTS , the Axiom is:
"All bow to the musician" -- the deepest of all arts.
Picasso is cool ,but he ain't gonna to sell out Giant's Stadium for folks to watch him paint.
Stand in line for hours m at the MMOMA,, yes,, you BET !!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Painting is much more valuable.
The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) is a place that fuels creativity, ignites minds, and provides inspiration. Its extraordinary exhibitions and collection of ...
www.moma.org/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Painting is much more valuable.
I heard attendance for live music events are down this year. I wonder why?
http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/index.php/archives/2010/06/16/live-nation-cancels-shows/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Painting is much more valuable.///I heard attendance for live music events are down this year. I wonder why?
ANS : the economy that Bush and Cheney ruined,, and that Mr. Obama is now ---slowly--- fixing.
(Read newspapers much?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Painting is much more valuable.///I heard attendance for live music events are down this year. I wonder why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Painting is much more valuable.///I heard attendance for live music events are down this year. I wonder why?
techdert is SOOOOO mainstream,,
and well respected in
elite academic establishments,
Law schools ,
and Congress.
------------------------------
Q: What would we do w/o Anonymous Cowards -- like you !!!
A: Live better
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Painting is much more valuable.///I heard attendance for live music events are down this year. I wonder why?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How about this?//First off we need a system
If you have no audience then you won't get far...
He who pays the piper calls the tune.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you have no audience then you won't get far...
ART
for
A R T S
SAKE
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If you have no audience then you won't get far...
And it's ars gratia artis.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And if the artist doesn't have the money then no art will be made.
People will ALWAYS give , love , Money. kisses , food , huggs , and a bed ,, ,,
and with girls it is usually to share the bed.
I know it is only rock n' roll
But I like It !!!!
------------
I am also a multi-media DJ :
the Rolling Stones :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhHODhTIvgo
AND LISTEN TO THE WORD HERE , Mick lyrics here ,
in my humble opinion:
Best song in rock-- about rock
Rolling Stones - It's Only Rock 'n Roll (But I Like It)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhHODhTIvgo
[ and Kieth you still owe me a quarter , from 1984. :) ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How about this?//First off we need a system
1. You don't actually know that - so you are making assumptions again - and many of your assumptions have turned out to be wrong before.
2. So only the lunatics should have a say in running the asylum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
actually , yes , I do know you are not a musician. /// Re: How about this?//First off we need a system
1] you have never mentioned it , in ANY you 300,000 words written about my posts the last few weeks.
2] it is no where on supposed facility page
3] it is clear from your posting here ,, you have ZERO "atheistic artistic life perspective".
4] Artists -- it takes one to know one,
------------------------
And again Rich, where do you find the time to post in any and every thread a browse here.
I just have been reading this thread since mike started it ,, but beside , browsing the posts front pat ,, i have not entered or read any other threads here in days.
----------------------------------------------
[ of course w/o yours truly , most threads @ techdirt are boring ,, mine get the highest web traffic "ratings"--- right Mike ? :) ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
2. So only the l Musicians should have a say in running the Music Biz !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"propping up the top ... holding back new comers"
That's why the only solution -- the only one that I *wish* to occur, others are unpleasant for *all* -- is to return to Populism and the view that The Rich are the major menace to society, and more so when they gain control of the gov't, and so a steeply progressive income tax is needed. Yes, we can't make everyone rich by giving away gov't money, and note that I don't advocate such, but The Rich are rich precisely because they have effective ways to skim from large numbers of people: somehow *their* re-distribution schemes are socially acceptable. In practice, it's easier to be born rich than to earn it, and those numbers and their arrogance are growing until we're practically saddled with royalty.
Perhaps some don't know that income tax originally applied *only* to the richest 1% or so, and that's the way it should be. Income tax is a means to control populations, yes, but the notion of *who* needs controlled -- based on evidence from all of history -- has been lost, because every American thinks that they're rich, or soon will be, and high tax rates will affect them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
perhaps a more fair and obvious system is to send them same size check to everyone who is registered with the society. with the current recording tools and autotune, every one of us can write and publish a song, join the society, and profit from the musical socialism at play.
posts like this mike absolutely expose your socialist leanings, which explains many other things you post.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "soshalisms!"
The system is already designed to take everyone's money (the PRO's think that everyone needs pay them a music tax forever)and give some to a tiny handful or performers and writers while keeping the rest for themselves.
What we have here is mike letting us know, despite his own reservations about the PROs, about someones interesting idea.
I know, i know.. the idea that the groups that claim to pay their members and "have their member's interests in mind" should actually Pay Out a tiny fraction of their income rather then rejiggering the math and forgetting to send out checks.. that kind of idea is wacky soshalist commi nazi maoist leninist talk!
I know, i know, i am making the mistake of responding to a blatant and foolish troll, sorry everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "soshalisms!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PRS/PPL just give their money to the big boys
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
100/100
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 100/100
I will make sure everybody gets their fair share !!!
-------------------
But ASCAP does that already ,, hmmmm
-------------------------------------
so , now ,, I can smoke a cigge ,
and deposit my yearly royalty check , of $56.93 -- which is better than 95% of struggling songwriters do.
============================
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 100/100
no wonder you are such a bitter, nasty, obnoxious individual ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: 100/100 === no wonder you are such a bitter, nasty, obnoxious individual ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: 100/100 === no wonder you are such a bitter, nasty, obnoxious individual ...
Checklist
irony - nope
derision - nope
wit - not at all
"But ASCAP does that already ,, hmmmm"
sarcasm perhaps ... better luck next time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 100/100 === no wonder you are such a bitter, nasty, obnoxious individual ...
Me : point granted. (Irony)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 100/100 === no wonder you are such a bitter, nasty, obnoxious individual ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignore TP
I was at odds about even the idea of a collection agency.
You've put it much more aptly than I could, and I like the reasoning.
"Collection societies are all about shaking down small businesses for payments they can distribute to their own executives and a few major artists. Independents and smaller artists don't need them, they need to be heard. Then it's up to the artist to offer scarcities these incoming potential fans can buy. Don't expect to sit on your laurels and get checks every time a coffee shop plays your song, as if they're not doing -you- the favor."
With the advent of Myspace, Facebook and other, more personal ways to connect, any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply. The bigger artists can have radio if need be since it's in the rules. But as the internet is showing, it's the ones such as Gym Class Heroes, or even GirlTalk, who are becoming the artists of tomorrow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ignore TP //any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply.
ME : VERY TRUE !11 I love how the internet help me publizice my Music.
As LONG , as I have COPYRIGHT ARTISTIC CONTROL 100%
-- heck I will even take 90% online -- till the copyright laws and technologies catch up with cyber-space
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ignore TP //any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Ignore TP //any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply.
my techo-political blog for 10 years now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Ignore TP //any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply.
BTW your career in politics that took most of your life started after you decided to go to college when you was 37, so tell us are you 75 years old?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ignore TP //any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply.
I got an "A"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ignore TP //any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ignore TP //any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ignore TP //any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply.
But here @ techdirt ,, I am just explaining myself against "baseless accusations" towards my "intelligence" and "academic integrity"
=================================
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ignore TP //any artist or independent can connect to their fans much more simply.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't think those accusations are actually baseless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BTW your career in politics that took most of your life started after you decided to go to college when you was 37, so tell us are you 75 years old?
MATH !!!! think!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ignore TP
Thanks! That's got to be a first for me.
Jesting aside, I think you make a good point. And without royalties and other tedious "rights" organizations, radio stations and other mainstream venues can rapidly jump on the popularity bandwagon. Those internet-famous artists (and, I believe, any artist) can more easily expand their reach when anybody, be it blogger or radio DJ, can play and share their music.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: astroturfer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: astroturfer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: astroturfer
I hag a paying gig last nite , in the Village of Greenwich NYC ,, did not get home till 3am. woke at 10am,, and now am watch BUFFY at you tube ,,till tonite's gig.
I have seen BUFFY 10x already , still love it each time ,, techdirt -- is just fun, -- and my technopolitical hobby.
http://technopoliticalscience.blogspot.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LoL 90% LoL
LMAOROTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(Big studio manager moment)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LMAOROTF, Laughing My Ass Off Rolling on the Floor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That is good for a few laughs LoL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Are you going to start listing your allegedly academic accomplishments to try and force people to respect you more?
ME : not alleged,, very well factual . want references?
YOU :to try and force people to respect you more?
Me : Respect form a Pirate is not true respect. Respect for moral , peace-loving sane human beings --- that is RESPECT .
=========================
RESPECT : Aretha Franklin -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0XAI-PFQcA
Aretha Franklin -- "the Queen of rock & soul;" -- it really does not get any better than this musically. ( not only a great singer,, but she also she plays piano like an angel too.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Aretha Franklin -- "the Queen of rock & soul;
Aretha Franklin -- "the Queen of rock & soul;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSdFTVhFyyc&feature=related
Aretha Franklin - Respect
( she is soooooooooo great,,, makes you , or anyone with a soul .. cry )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LoL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Do you think you are the only one that can be annoying without having to say anything that makes sense?
I make Alot of sense,, you cannot get a BA with honors form a top 50 school w/o making sense.
as well , i am an Orthodox rabbi ,, the hardest study there is .. Even doctors cede to Rabbis for final say -- in my culture
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Do you think you are the only one that can be annoying without having to say anything that makes sense?
- A rabbi
- An ex musician with 20 years experience.
- A political science BA that worked in politics most of his life from a the top 50 college and knows the president liar Obama.
Fine you have no shame.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Do you think you are the only one that can be annoying without having to say anything that makes sense?
Yes hard to believe someone of my stature would waste his time here at techdirt,, but i work form home alot ,, and actually enjoy it. And maybe i will reform a few Pirates.
--------------------------------------
I can also throw a Frisbee very well with either hand,,,
Was the best "stick-ball" "switch hitter" in my hometown, And a much better than average pitcher,,, played "table soccer" a a professional level in the late 1970's,
And wide receivers in high school , hated me too, because in pick up games .. i was the as about good as a defensive back as you can be-- just try catching the ball in my zone.
Basketball I suck , soccer too,, except for being goalie , where i am very good.
--------------------------------
If you search around the internet on me ,, from my blogs and stuff , you can verify EVERYTHING I post here about myself, 3x over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Do you think you are the only one that can be annoying without having to say anything that makes sense?
Was it on sundays you got your rabbi certificate from the mail order?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please tell us when did you get the time to become a rabbi, was when you was doing drugs and touring, or was when you got to college at 37 and somehow got to expend "most of your life" in politics LoL
ME::: Three full years at an very Orthodox Chasidic Yeshiva ( no girls ) 1995-1998. I was living in the dorm , ate slept and lived there for three full years , aged 37-40. ( You hear alot about Kabalah , "Madonna style" , well I was studing the original Hebrew Kabalistic Texts for 3 full years. Was awarded a BA in Judaic Studies , 1998. ( www.rca.edu )
After that after , I comenced full time Academic & Judaic Studies at Yeshiva Univesity in NYC [ 1998-2003] . ( www.yu.edu ) At YU ,, you study Jewish stuff 9am to 1pm ,, then secular subjects the rest of the day. It is a top 50 college , and Yishiva University has both a Medical School ( Albert Eistein) and a law School ( Cardozza ).
YOU : ,was when you was doing drugs and touring,
Me : I have never toured. I have always played music in NYC , 90% Greenwich Village .
I try not to waste time in life. I work , learn , love , and laugh all the waking hours of my day.
Yeah sometime , I watch a movie , chill with a few brews,, but the conversation is always meaning full.
( Life secret : Try to make friend with people smarter and wiser than yourself. Life will be an adventure of learning and challenge)
YOU : or was when you got to college at 37 and somehow got to expend "most of your life" in politics LoL.
ME : Again see resume link below : form 1980- 1995 ,, I split my life between paid salaried strait job s ( NYPIRG , Greenpeace & political campaigns ) , and my Music.
I was not alone ,, I know many who lead the same lifestyle in NYC , and still do. Most every "pro" musician in NYC ,, has a strait job ,, unless signed to a big record deal ( or a rich girl friend /boy friend) , you have no choice. Gigs do not play well, A good guitar cost $1000 min.
ME ::
my resume :
http://technopoliticalscience.blogspot.com/search/label/my%20full%20resume
my musical history blog at my space
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=418825547&blogId=486949 645
also
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=418825547&blogId=47728708 6
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Do you think you are the only one that can be annoying without having to say anything that makes sense?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Do you think you are the only one that can be annoying without having to say anything that makes sense?
http://technopoliticalscience.blogspot.com/search/label/my%20full%20resume
my music :
http://www.myspace.com/radamhalperin
my homepage:
http://sites.google.com/site/rahalperin2/home
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you think you are the only one that can be annoying without having to say anything that makes sense?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YOU the "AC" :"Oh I get it! You're a marketing tool."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you think you are the only one that can be annoying without having to say anything that makes sense?
after checking out your music and your site and getting some context in which to frame your comments here it leads me to only one simple thing i can tell you.
drugs are bad mmmmkay?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you think you are the only one that can be annoying without having to say anything that makes sense?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you find his stuff amusing, keep on making comments like this. It'll keep him fueled up and shouting. I personally think it's kind of funny, so I've thrown a few comments his way. However, this has pretty much run it's course in this particular thread so I think it's about time to ignore him for a while and let him fade into obscurity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
When ever i prove my points here ,, some AC write --- something like "FU moron" !!!
At least you wrote nicely -- an I do really appreciate that.
You are full of it -- but you wrote nice
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dude, his whole blog is just a series of grammar-challenged rants against Masnick. What an obsessive loser!
There are 500 posts on my blog,, all labeled by topic,, there is much more than copyright there .
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Research site:http://technopolitical.blogspot.com/
Current events site :http://technopoliticalscience.blogspot.com/
MORE READING -- less WRITING
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 6:25 pm Comment Held for Moderation...
Please inform me of the techdirt posting policy.
I do not see one posted .
-------------------------------------------
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Comment Held for Moderation...
Thanks for your comment.
It will be reviewed by our staff before it is posted.
Back to the story.
http://techdirt.com/comment_process.php
6:25 pm June 16th
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 6:25 pm Comment Held for Moderation...
The spam filter picked up your comment, because of the way you spelled something. It's similar to the spelling of a regularly spammed item in the comments, and the spam engine rated it as likely to be spam.
I cleared it. Every so often legit comments get caught by the spam filter. We then clear them. No need to act like you were targeted personally.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 6:25 pm Comment Held for Moderation...
-------------------
MIKE :Every so often legit comments get caught.
Me : thanks for the "legit" validation. I am honored.
-----------------
But do you have a posting policy ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Welfare for musicians and artists no one wants to hear or see
Some of the worst music and art I have ever seen or heard, but that's okay; they were paid for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Welfare for musicians and artists no one wants to hear or see
In order to really have musicians come make better and more music, you want them to give themselves incentives. Getting to the top of the charts is an incentive. Better deals with their publishing studio is an incentive.
New ways to be heard (filesharing, P2P) is an incentive. Sadly that's what we're losing in the battle against technology.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Welfare for musicians and artists no one wants to hear or see
------------------------
My Answer :
Lou Reed for PRESIDENT in 2016.
Jackson Browne would by my choice for VP , Lou ; but the rest of the cabinet got to be "Gov't pros",, the world is an important place -- as musicians are too humble to be complete dictators of policies-- (rightly so.)
( hey dudes , in "1968" , "Ronald Regan for President" , was a wackier idea than Lou Reed in 2016,))
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the blanket license is a massive fraud
[ link to this | view in chronology ]