Revolving Door: Administration's ACTA Defender Jumps Ship To US Chamber Of Commerce

from the lobbyists-in-and-out dept

Wed, Jul 7th 2010 8:32pm — Mike Masnick

You may remember Steven Tepp, from the US Copyright Office, who just recently defended the administration's position on ACTA by mocking the very legitimate concerns of many people about ACTA's exporting of stronger copyright laws, without any corresponding exceptions, combined with the fact that it would lock in currently in-flux US caselaw with no chance for Congress to fix mistakes by the courts. James Love alerts us to the news that Tepp has left the employment of the government to become the "Senior Director of Internet Piracy and Counterfeiting" for the US Chamber of Commerce.

The Chamber of Commerce of course (a private organization, not to be confused -- as some people do -- with the government's Commerce Department) is famous for its anti-fact position on IP laws, where it always believes greater protectionism is better, despite the evidence. Of course, when all of the evidence is against the Chamber of Commerce, it came out with its own laughable study that confuses correlation with a causal relationship, and bases its conclusions on lumping together various companies and assigning their success or failure entirely to intellectual property laws. It sounds like Tepp should fit right in, though it again highlights the revolving door between the folks who make the policies and those who lobby for the policies.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: anti-piracy, copyright, steve tepp
Companies: us chamber of commerce

20 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Fake Tam, 7 Jul 2010 @ 8:56pm

What's your point Mike, instead of arguing against ACTA based on conflicts of interest why not argue against what the document actually says. What's the matter, you don't have any valid criticisms against what the document actually says?

Just because there are conflicts of interest doesn't mean that those conflicts of interest are responsible for the secrecy. There could be good reasons that nobody is allowed to know what the document actually says, like national security. Just because the government lied about the national security concern in the last leaked and subsequently released document doesn't mean that national security isn't an issue in these new secret documents. Maybe these new documents have highly classified information that terrorists can somehow use. You don't know which is why you shouldn't point out these conflicts of interests as something to worry about.

Besides, you can always hire a psychic to know what the document actually says. What, can't afford to hire a psychic? I'm sure Miss Cleo would give you a discount.

Oh, and I forgot one thing. It must be Wednesday which means it's a slow news day suggesting that there must be more to this story. Even the AP recognizes it's a slow news day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Fake Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2010 @ 9:06pm
  
  Re:
  Troll.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Fake Angry Dude, 7 Jul 2010 @ 9:10pm
    
    Re: Re:
    punks!!!!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Dark Helmet (profile), 8 Jul 2010 @ 6:11am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      In the interest of playing the game, I'll play myself as:
      
      by Fake Dark Helmet, Jul 8th, 2010 @ 6:10am
      
      All three of you are part of a government and alien conspiracy! It all began on the planet Titty-Poop and involves the NSA, the CIA, Paris Hilton, and my dogs Deelee and Roscoe, who are actually cybordogs that can shoot death rays from their nipples!
      
      AAAHHHH! Tin foil hat! Tin foil hat!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2010 @ 9:14pm
  
  Re:
  Oh, and I forgot one last argument.
  
  Mike, you just have to trust them. Forget about their untrustworthy history and just trust them. After all, if you can't trust your own government then who can you trust?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- harbingerofdoom (profile), 7 Jul 2010 @ 9:17pm
  
  Re:
  morons are out, must be a day that ends with Y.
  
  are you seriously suggesting that the citizens of ANY country should need to hire a psychic in order to know what its government is doing?
  
  national security issues? a very hesitant maybe...
  trade agreements? never.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - harbingerofdoom (profile), 7 Jul 2010 @ 9:18pm
    
    Re: Re:
    unless of course you are overthetoptam v2.0 in which case you take your argument to the most ridiculous extreme in order to show how stupid it sounds
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- imbrucy (profile), 8 Jul 2010 @ 5:53am
  
  Re:
  It sounds to me that your post is complete sarcasm, but it's so well written that I'm not sure if it's sarcasm or if you are just a little insane.
  
  Well played.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2010 @ 9:15pm

"where it always believes greater protectionism is better, despite the evidence" - another semi-truth. since we have not operated "in the real world" without ip in some form for hundreds of years, there is no real indication what would happen without it.

a bunch of virtual hippies claiming we should all live in communes isnt evidence, its opinion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2010 @ 10:11pm
  
  Re:
  Even if true that doesn't negate the fact that the evidence suggests IP is bad.
  
  See
  
  http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/intellectual/against.htm
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2010 @ 7:56am
    
    Re: Re:
    you point exactly at the type of report that is opinion, not fact, from two guys that 40 years ago would have been on a commune, not writing papers. again, no proof, just opinion.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2010 @ 7:05pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      To TAM, pages upon pages of citations and evidence are all just "opinion, not fact."
      
      I imagine this is because his reading comprehension abilities stop at around a few sentences.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 7 Jul 2010 @ 10:39pm
  
  Re:
  That TAM-impersonation was pretty good.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - imbrucy (profile), 8 Jul 2010 @ 5:54am
    
    Re: Re:
    Except he included punctuation. That gave him away.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
other fake tam, 7 Jul 2010 @ 9:29pm

left to its own devices time will always go on. ergo, there will always be more to this story. hence i am always right and all you commie hippies are always wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fake Dennis Yang, 7 Jul 2010 @ 9:49pm

Nothing is more tragic than the spectacle of an intelligent, conscientious person wasting their precious time in a futile argument with a complete and utter twit, when that person could instead be playing with the kids, creating a great piece of art, or just reading a good book.

Hold on, did I say 'tragic'? I meant to say 'hilarious.'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moron, 8 Jul 2010 @ 6:05am

I'm in a hurry
I'm confused about whether the US Chamber Of Commerce is a real government organization or just a lobbying group for big business that wants to look like it is a government organization.

Think I'll start a lobbying group and call it the Supreme Court of the United States.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beta (profile), 8 Jul 2010 @ 7:38am

my card
Tepp has left the employment of the government to become the "Senior Director of Internet Piracy and Counterfeiting"...

I... would give almost anything to have that job title.

(I know, I know, it would just be a question of who killed me first, James Bond or my own boss, but still.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2010 @ 10:24am
  
  Re: my card
  Yeah, I had the same thought when I read that title. Then I thought, "Man, Internet Piracy and Counterfeiting must be really big business if they have their own division within the Chamber of Commerce."
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Aug 2010 @ 4:44am

Here's an idea. How about we ban stupid corporations like "US Chamber of Commerce", "US Copyright Group", etc. from calling themselves these names that are obviously intended to confuse the uninformed into thinking they are government entities.

Unfortunately, I doubt this would ever happen. Cunts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]