Jim Brown Appeals Case Over Whether Or Not EA Can Use His Likeness In A Video Game
from the first-amendment? dept
Back in September last year, we wrote about an important district court ruling that said video game maker EA was within its rights to use a likeness of football player Jim Brown in its video games. In the past few decades, there has been a dangerous expansion in so-called "publicity rights," like this that effectively put serious limits on what others can do. This expansion needs to be challenged, even if it seems like something so simple as a video game. Not surprisingly, however, Brown is now appealing the district court's decision to dismiss the case, saying that he wasn't able to present all the facts. We noted last year that this case would certainly be appealed, so this doesn't come as a huge surprise. Still, it should be a case worth watching if you are concerned about the expansion of concepts like publicity rights (and, on the flip side, about free expression rights).Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: jim brown, likeness, publicity rights, video games
Companies: ea
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This isn't "free expression rights."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This isn't "free expression rights."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This isn't "free expression rights."
Jim Brown if it wins can stifle free speech and democracy.
Next every politician has a tool to take down others that use his/her image, next anyone posting a photo of someone else will have to endure C&D letters etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This isn't "free expression rights."
Or their words.
Free speech > publicity rights any day of the week, in my opinion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jim Brown ain't a football player
The original case alleges that EA used his likeness (that of a football fan wearing a dog mask) in the last iteration of their Madden football series.
God forbid that a football game portray a football fan wearing a mask - note that they did not use the man's actual likeness, rather they used an image of a football fan wearing a dog mask. Does this mean that if I attend a football game wearing a dog mask, I am infringing upon Jim Brown's absolutely original idea and that I owe him something?
I don't think so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Jim Brown ain't a football player
http://kotaku.com/5369702/federal-judge-rules-video-games-are-protected-expressive-works
Unless you have a source that says otherwise of course.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Jim Brown ain't a football player
Maybe I should pay more attention next time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm...
Why? Other than because the law says so of course.
I am not a fan of publicity rights except in the case of unlawful use.
Isn't that just another way of saying you're a fan of publicity rights?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
thanks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]