Even If You Know About The Gorilla, You Might Not Catch The Unexpected
from the did-you-see-it? dept
There's a very famous perception experiment, which many of you have probably seen. If you haven't, you should watch it here before reading on:"A lot of people seem to take the message of our original gorilla study to be that people don't pay enough attention to what is happening around them, and that by paying more attention and 'expecting the unexpected,' we will be able to notice anything important," he added. "The new experiment shows that even when people know that they are doing a task in which an unexpected thing might happen, that doesn't suddenly help them notice other unexpected things."The guys behind the videos have done some other unique experiments as well, which you can find on their website. The other one I really like is this experiment involving a guy asking a pedestrian for directions, where the guy asking for directions is secretly "switched" with someone else in the middle, and 50% of people don't even notice:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: attention, perception, unexpected
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does this test really say a lot?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I almost got it.
Did get the right count both times though. :)
Very interesting. I'm wondering though if somebody was to watch the video more than once, without the explanation, if they would be more likely to catch the unexpected, or if they would continue to miss it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I almost got it.
I think you'd spot it the second time through even without an explanation, you wouldn't be concentrating on counting the passes then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I almost got it.
Ah, but what if the second time they told you to count the black player passes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, I caught the curtain colour at the very end (and really only noticed because of how fake the red background looked). But I still noticed the missing player as soon as she walked off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Get over yourself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Door study
Quick: What the color was the second guy wearing? Is it the same as the first guy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where's the controversy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Where's the controversy?
To your point, however, I'm sure there's someone out there who can figure out how to abuse the system to suppress this research. Perhaps a bogus DMCA takedown or other claims of IP infringement?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Pussy switch
I too didn’t see the Gorilla the first time I saw this video a few years ago and didn’t notice the curtain change this time. Yahoo had some puzzles posted on the main page and one that is truly enlightening to our malleable perspective is the "Rotating Pussy". I found this illusion before reading the story and have been working the Pussy for sometime now with great enjoyment. The trick is to use your peripheral vision.
Optical Illusion “Rotating Pussy”
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Pussy switch
Take a look at Techdirt's default silhouette avatar (for example, see Mr. Block, above). Is the figure facing towards you or away from from you? With some practice, you may be able to perceive it either way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Distractions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Distractions
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wizard: My advice to you is that you should always expect the unexpected.
Rincewind: But how can it be unexpected if I am always expecting it?
Wizard: Good point. Then my advice to you is to always expect the expected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We're talking about language (or only semantics) as much as perception when we say: "an unexpected event".
An event, or occurence, is not the gradual change of a colour (which was painfully obvious I might add), this is as much an event as are the patterns of shadow changing on the ground because of moving clouds. No we don't generally describe this as an event.
The person leaving could be seen as an event (didn't see it the first time), but it has no influence over the proceedings.
A gorilla stepping into the group is something of a completely different magnitude.
"Notice changes" would be a better description for what happens instead of "notice unexpected events", which is misleading.
The guy asking for directions switcharoo has been done by about every candid camera show ever. So that's hardly worth a mention... in fact, most of invisible gorilla's work I find very uninspired.
By comparison, the little whodunnit video (at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubNF9QNEQLA) is an amazing example of what human perception can miss.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An audio analogy
Since you could technically "hear" them, then why couldn't you remember what they were talking about?
These "awareness" tests are a bunch of bull. They simply show how we humans process information selectively so as to not become overwhelmed by it. The room full of people having conversations is no different that looking at the team passing the ball and then the gorilla shows up. Sight is no different than sound in this respect when it comes to information.
There is no way you can become more "aware" so that you'd perceive every minute change around you. And even if you could somehow be altered to be that "aware" you'd be unable to function normally due to all the sensory overload you'd be trying to cope with.
These guys are showing a well done experiment but draw stupid conjectures from them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ADHD
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not quite getting it
You are directed to focus your attention on a task and that is what causes you to miss obvious changes in the scene. If the instructions were changed then you could expect that more people would notice the "unexpected".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How this applies to patents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How this applies to patents
Misdirection is a completely different thing than hindsight, and patent examiners have many more times to look over everything.
If you were show the video twice, even with the part explaining the gorilla taken out, I think pretty much everyone would catch the gorilla.
There are many, many ways this analogy fails horribly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Heh...
But when the second video was introduced, I knew there was something else going to come of it. Oddly enough, a tall blonde wearing black was just too damn good looking to stop looking at, and I watched as she left the game completely unrelated to the test at hand.
The third video I've seen before, so it wasn't a surprise to see the outcome. The 50% was the bigger surprise. This number has grown in the 20 years since I last saw the test.
I guess in today's world, if it's not electronically given to people, it's worthless to pay attention to it. Just like driving. Why care about other drivers when there are so many other gadgets one can play with while driving.
Oh well. I'm sure when I die, my casket will pop up 2 message boxes asking if it's okay to really bury the box, come with malware protection so my bones don't rot away faster, and my tombstone will read "To read the text for this marker, please visit the nearest app store and pay $1.99 to view it. Oh, and it's copyright, bitches!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Invisible Gorilla
Einstein was often "dinged" for perpetually not noticing things, such as, "get off the train here to go home". I submit he did more than the people who always got off at the right station.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
None of this really surprises me
An interesting corollary is that once you have a belief you will notice evidence that supports that belief but fail to notice evidence which refutes it. I think we see that kind of thing in the comments on this site a lot.
And I notice that I do this all the time, so I'm not just talking about people I don't agree with. It goes for the people I do agree with ... and me too. Realizing this lets me be slightly more objective, I think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Always amazed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I did miss the player leaving tho.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Magicians
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Almost missed the gorilla, even though I knew it would happen at some point. Did catch the person leaving. Missed the curtain color change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]