RIM Works Out Deal In Saudi Arabia, Causing Many To Wonder If They Can Trust Their BlackBerry
from the well,-you-never-could-before... dept
With last week's news that the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia were going to block access for BlackBerry users over the inability to spy on RIM's servers, the news over the weekend that Saudi Arabia is testing three local servers that would alleviate the need for a ban has many wondering how secure their BlackBerry communications really are.Of course, the more pertinent question may be how secure BlackBerry communications have ever been. One of the big complaints from the UAE and Saudi Arabia (and others) is that they believe RIM already lets certain governments access content flowing across their network. And, of course, no one seems willing to come out with a straight answer one way or the other on whether or not that's an accurate statement. However, as the NY Times article above makes clear, whether or not governments really do have access to RIM's network probably isn't as meaningful as some believe, since there are multiple different potential points of access for anyone wishing to monitor messages. About the only thing that is clear is that if you're communicating online, it's probably best to assume that, sooner or later, someone other than the intended recipients will probably see it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blackberries, email, privacy, saudi arabia
Companies: rim
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Mass Surveillance = Mass Distraction
This is the problem that Western agencies had with the Underwear Bomber. They couldn’t “connect the dots”, because they had collected too many dots. Stick to targeted policing based on specific information received, and you’ll have a much better success rate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Said it before and I will say it again...
Now as others have pointed out "You are depending on the crypto people who designed and wrote the proofs for the algorithms you are using" but if you are using/layering multiple methods and not depending on a single service/tool it greatly reduces the chances of any one person being able to crack it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
I'll add that the algorithms are usually pretty safe in themselves since they aren't too hard to analyse rigorously -- as long as no-one cracks them, that is.
It's the implementation that may lack in many instances, which can contain bugs and sometimes even backdoors that are usually much easier to exploit than weaknesses in the encryption scheme.
I guess the best option is to use open source tools whose code is available so we can check for ourselves it doesn't contain any "proprietary magic" compiled into the executables.
But, yes: layering trumps all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
You see, genius, wast amount of population does not encrypt their messages. It doesn't matter whether it's good thing or not. It is a fact. So, your "secured" PGP'ed talk is very distinct. It's like writing "I have stuff to hide" on your back.
Another fact of life for you: when some man-in-black will come to ask you "a few questions" you can't say "I won't tell you". You will tell. That's why those 3-letter agencies exists - make people talk. Right-to-remain-silent you say? Yea, right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
How did you get out?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
I'm with you. And again I say "Wtf??"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
When you meet people that _really_ want your email - your game is up, no matter whether it was real conspiracy or home porno.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
After waterboarding?
"When you meet people that _really_ want your email - your game is up, no matter whether it was real conspiracy or home porno."
... and then you are stoned to death - woohoo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
I work for a company that encrypts *ALL* its email no matter what it is. I encrypt my email at home just out of habit. Just because the majority does it does not mean its because they have nothing to hide. I have seen my roommates email passwords to people for their ebay accounts and such. if I were them I would encrypt that. You are just being Mr. Tinfoil Hatt today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
Yes it does. Tell, me mister privacy, why don't you encrypt your phone calls? Government can listen to them! Ah, I see - you rely on wiretapping laws to protect you. And with email it somehow different?
You can play with your toys all day long, nobody really want to read your email - (skip gmail robots). And when "people" will need your mail - you will give them encryption keys.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
Back to original question: just pass (really) confidential info personally. Or by mail (you know, one with envelope). Those kind of communication is match harder to intercept without being noticed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
"just pass (really) confidential info personally"
Well I like to see a company issuing new passwords to its offshore workers in person once a week, or people trying to contact relatives out of state to send them something private.
I don't think you live in the real world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Said it before and I will say it again...
I thought the problem was men in black helicopters coming to your house to beat the password out of you. That's not exactly hard to notice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No need for a fuss over BB.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Privacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Privacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We will write an app that will say one thing while encrypting the real conversation. That way the censors (polite word) will get to hear something and we get freedom.
Monitoring all of our phone and text messages just slows down an already extremely overloaded network.
How many terrorists have they actually caught from monitoring our calls. When you look in someone else's window you are called a creep, a peeping tom, a voyeur and lots of other nasty names and you can go to jail.
How come governments can do the same thing but worse by listening to our private phone calls? I call them creeps of the highest order.
So I have to restrict myself to landlines only. At least they have to put an actual order to monitor landlines but cell traffic is wide open to all of the hundreds of security agencies monitoring your life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]