Is There A Better Way To Text While Driving?
from the or-should-there-be? dept
Perhaps I'm strange, but I have to admit that I've never even considered sending a text message while driving. I will admit to reading a text message while sitting at a traffic light, but that's about the extent of it. Still, with more and more people seemingly unable to resist the temptation, is the best thing to do to fret and complain about this trend, or to try to come up with a technological solution? Is there a technological solution that would let people text safely? I'm not entirely sure, but it does seem a bit surprising that we haven't even heard of the equivalent of the "hands free" kit for texting. There are, of course, plenty of voice recognition offerings out there, but the quality still suffers (and most people still want to check over the results to make sure they work). I could see attempts at "augmented reality" where the screen on the phone shows what's happening on the road, but your focus would still be off. So, are there any technological solutions? My guess is that we're going to wait until we really get autonomous driving vehicles that have an "autopilot" mode before we reach a stage where any sort of texting while driving is safe.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Otherwise, I think that the old phones (phone key board instead of full keyboard) were probably safer. Any teenager learned to text without looking at the phone. How about a 12 button keypad on the armrest? You could probably learn to use it without looking rather fast.
There is always dictation software... Yes, voice recognition is a pain, but if all you are saying are the names of letters, it's not too bad... I think that's going to be my next droid app :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
it's called the designated texter:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=designated+texter
my daughter gets hit with that a lot: "here, text your mother and find out what she wants to do for dinner."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
britain's a lost cause. besides, no one cares about them :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
there is
http://ilane.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the call can't wait, pull the hell over.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
"Wrong" people? Why do you say that? Some people to know such things, you know. Quit being such a hater.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Short list off the top of my head.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As a motorcycle rider...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't text and drive.
Trust me, you suck at it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks!
CwF+RtB+FU=Profit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thanks!
CwF+RtB+FU=Profit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
already have options
Those are built-in, just need an app that makes them easy to start/stop/send in a hands free manner (clapper style).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's called Voice texting and it exists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why not, just let em do it !!!.
Great idea.. NOT..
Texting or even talking on the phone is a distraction that is equivalent to being drunk. Your focus is not driving a deadly vehicle, its about making sure you got the milk !!.
The US jumps up and down, and spends 10 billion a MONTH on some war in the middle east. because 3000 people got killed in some plain crashes.. (that was sad).
But at the same time, you let well over 10 times that figure die EACH YEAR on the roads, and you are trying to find out some way to make doing other things easier when you should be DRIVING THE FREAKING CAR..
It might be allright if you are the only person that might be killed, but that is rarly the case. And more probably you will run over a small child, or run into a crowd that is waiting for a bus..
All because you wanted to text some purile message to your friends..
Here, we have some sense, its illegal to talk on a mobile phone while driving, its also illegal to use hands free, and its certainly illegal to text.
(using a mobile phone, while driving, means USING a mobile phone, does not matter if you use it to text, or hands free. its still illegal. as it should be.)..
If you driving a car, DRIVE the damn car. Text, or chat later..
Take a bit of responsibility for your actions, and dont just look at what something can do FOR YOU, and screw everyone else.
So illegal or not, it would be good to see people using their brains and doing the right thing regardless of the laws.. (laws usually enforce the 'right things' anyway).
Like filesharing, you think as it advantages you, that its OK, it does not matter about anyone else..
Very selfish attitude, and show you are self centered.
"The music industry is doing fine, so I can justify my theft of their product for my own gains".
So does not matter what anyone else feels or things about it, as long as its good for you personally, its ok..
Well generally its not..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why not, just let em do it !!!.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Why not, just let em do it !!!.
- Adjusting the rear view mirror so you can see yourself
- Combing your hair
- Shaving
- Doing your bills
- Doing your makeup
- Breaking up with your spouse
- Sex
- Eating your lunch/breakfast/dinner/snack
- Deviant Sex
- Finishing your weekly report
- Playing video games
- Watching TV (especially recorded pornography)
- Beating your kids
The list goes on and on...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Why not, just let em do it !!!.
That's something I haven't ever seen before.
But I have seen reading a book and reading a newspaper in person, and of course the application of makeup, shaving and doing the hair are the popular 3 that I see all the time to the point that it is almost ordinary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Why not, just let em do it !!!.
If I can text and drive OK, why shouldn't I be allowed to do so? Same thing with drinking and driving. So what if I have a few drinks before getting behind the wheel? If I'm driving OK, what's the problem?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Why not, just let em do it !!!.
oblg.
"Don't text and drive.
Trust me, you suck at it."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why not, just let em do it !!!.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Why not, just let em do it !!!.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why not, just let em do it !!!.
Except that's not true... Hands-free kits make it legal to use the phone. Also, your argument doesn't hold. If holding a conversation by phone is distracting, what about holding a conversation with your passenger with whom you will be tempted to make eye-contact?! What about listening to the radio?
The truth is, you and many others are oversimplifying enormously. Some activities are more dangerous than others, nobody actually knows what the risk of using your phone and driving simultaneously is, (sure we have the accident stats, but how accurate do you think is the how many people are doing it without accident stats?) different driving situations raise or lower the risk (stopped at a red light vs merging on the highway) etc...
The truth is as always complicated and this naive simplistic approach of yours won't work anyways. Some people will be texting and driving. Sure, we can throw them in jail after their behavior has caused significant danger, or we could reduce the amount of danger their behavior causes.
As to your comments on filesharing, your position is to put it mildly quite shallow. Copyright is not a property right. It's a monopoly right. It's the same way that some countries have government monopoly on things like gambling, electricity or whatever else. When you violate that monopoly, you are not stealing. You are simply violating that monopoly. Stealing involves someone loosing something. If you can't understand that, notice the difference next time someone infringes your copyright (you can't even notice that it happens) as opposed to stealing your car and you can't drive to work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Back to the future?
it could be sent to another cellphone where it would be read out loud (let's get crazy and say IN MY OWN VOICE) to the recipient...
who could then talk into his phone and have his message converted and intantly sent to my phone where I could hear his message (in his voice?!?)...
hmmmmmmm...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Back to the future?
Reason #1 is the same reason people on hands free talking are still at great risk - your attention. With a text message conversation, controlled by voice or otherwise, you decide when you divert your attention to it. With a person on a phone call they will speak when it's convenient for them, and if you want to communicate with them you will divert some attention (and perhaps do so at an inopportune moment).
Reason #2 is that driving is not the only thing in our lives deserving of attention, and the structure of text messaging allows the person on the other end to make the same decisions about when to divert their attention to the message(s).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why text versus talk?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Back to the future?
That is why I actually get annoyed when people call me no matter the situation without pre-arranging a call. I mean, who do they think they are that they can command my attention at that precise moment? My wife and some family members are fine, but everyone else, I strangely enough have come to expect some sort of text-based communication to make sure it's ok to call first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Back to the future?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Back to the future?
it could be sent to another cellphone where it would be read out loud (let's get crazy and say IN MY OWN VOICE) to the recipient...
who could then talk into his phone and have his message converted and intantly sent to my phone where I could hear his message (in his voice?!?)...
hmmmmmmm...'
Brilliant, that is a business opportunity in the waiting...
Wait, in fact that is all most like....making a phone call...Damn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i suppose ppl can send voice message with MMS instead.
a bit more tweaking and we are there
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Best part is that it's here, right now. I use it often.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well
That said, I sometimes send a text while driving without using the aforementioned technological solution, and I'm not remorseful about it. I do it on the highway when there aren't other cars within a quarter mile, and don't if there are. I suppose I'm putting myself at a very slightly higher risk of hitting a deer who happens to leap across the highway, but part of life is knowing what risks are acceptable and what risks aren't.
I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who aren't good at assessing risks who will say I'm a terrible driver for doing so, but I'm not particularly concerned with what they have to say.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, well.
Hitting a deer can be fatal for more than just the deer.
Just sayin'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, well.
The driver who is fully attentive to the road but 15 feet behind you (this is most drivers on the road) is far more of a threat to you then the driver who is texting while masturbating but a quarter mile behind you. So if you're really worried about the threat I pose to you and want to avoid roads I drive on, you should avoid driving altogether, as just about every driver out there is driving beyond your personal threshold of acceptable risk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Well, well.
Go ahead and text, I don't care. Hit the deer, roll down the embankment, and then put rescuers in danger trying to extract you from a destroyed vehicle. If it's worth that much for you to send a message, then nobody can stop you. Nothing you say can justify your actions, even though you believe exactly the opposite.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Well, well.
The "additional risk" I am taking is no different from the "additional risk" you take when you choose to drive 65 instead of 55, or to drive at night instead of during the day, or to change the radio while driving, or to talk to your passengers, or to drive a car that doesn't have anti lock brakes, or to...you get the idea.
Thankfully, in these other cases you are capable of actually making an honest assessment of the risk, whereas in the case of texting you only can have an emotional reaction and freak out. This is probably because texting can be basically the most dangerous thing one can do while driving. It can also be relatively harmless. It all depends on the circumstances. This is no different from DUI- DUI with .2 BAC is very dangerous, DUI with .02 is not. Both are DUI, though!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It will be especially great for all of the unsecured children that I, a passenger, call the cops about while my husband is driving.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Wait, what did people do before cellphones? My memory isn't what it used to be and I can't quite remember..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Oh, wait...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
So, you were a bad driver before too, huh? Too bad there isn't some way get people like you out from behind the wheel *before* you kill someone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Actually, I'm too young for unfolded maps. Online mapping services have always been my bitch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes, when you say "we" it most certainly does include yourself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Umm, "most people" had better sense than to do that. You seem to be one of the exceptions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cue Dwight Schrute: FACT! I'm a safe driver.
And yes, I text behind the wheel. I also eat, talk on the phone (now with handsfree thanks to my new car), listen to nagging girlfriend stories, check email, use my GPS, change the radio station, sing to CDs, and occasionally have conversations with passengers.
All these activities can be lumped in the same category of "multitasking."
We tend to single out texting because some people are addicted to it, but the truth is it's myopic and illogical.
Driving and texting do not have to be unsafe if you do it properly, just like any of the other above activities. Why don't we educate people on how to multitask behind the wheel since we all will HAVE to do it at some point? Let's be realistic with this folks.
Anyone that tells me I'm unsafe can look at my 16 year driving record and consequently eat me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The issue with texting specifically is you are looking away from the road repeatedly and often (usually). This is enough to be an issue already.
The problem with regular phone calls is using one hand (sometimes - seen lots of knee driving!) to drive added to the fact that if you watch someone on a phone call and follow their eyes - rarely do they pay much attention to what they are actually looking at unless they are specifically describing an item or reading to someone. Watch someone talk on the phone and see where their eyes go. If you ask them after the call what they were looking at while they were talking - rarely can they recall anything specific. This combination of inattentiveness to the surroundings and limited control of the vehicle is a recipe for an accident that doesn't require extreme circumstances at all.
I don't mind hands free calls nearly as much and I typically will answer a call using my bluetooth headset. In all honesty, I'd prefer to actually arrive at my destination - then take the call/message. However, if the call is regarding how to get to the destination - then a conflict arises, but it can still be solved by pulling over and taking the call.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"""Anyone that tells me I'm unsafe can look at my 16 year driving record and consequently eat me."""
I don't need to look at your driving record, it is completely irrelevant. Trying to type out a text message while driving is basically inherently unsafe. If you do it, you are an unsafe driver. Also, I decline to eat you, thanks anyway.
Texting almost always involves: taking hands off the steering wheel, taking eyes off the road. Now explain to me how you're a borg and you only use one hand and you don't have to look at your phone to write and send the message. Congratulations, you are in a minority so small that I wouldn't even begin to try to calculate the percentage.
Bottom line: it's an unsafe practice, many many of us do it, and most of us agree that there could/should be a better way to answer and send messages without disrupting our driving.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Be a bit more precise. It raises the level of risk. Because honestly, if the only two possibilities are safe and unsafe, we should place driving a car in the unsafe category and probably ban it.
"you only use one hand and you don't have to look at your phone to write and send the message."
Somebody was not in school when cellphones became popular. Texting with the phone inside your pocket is something you learn at age 12 today. Of course, won't work you smartphones...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Perfect driving record
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I like to pull a loaded gun out and walk around my house with the hammer back. Ive never killed anyone so I guess its safe. Anyone that tells me I'm unsafe can check my police record and consequently eat me as well then eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Anonymous Coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Anonymous Coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No, you're a lucky driver who thinks you're more important than the other people on the road. When that luck runs out, I just hope your victim is a utility pole and not another driver.
People like this make me sick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Article: There A Better Way To Text While Driving?
Understanding and recognizing that texting is here and growing rapidly is the first step to getting our arms around the text and drive issue. I appreciate that the author of this article was honest about his own texting and driving activities - I think this is how the end user can actually start changing their behavior. In forums like this we can also let people know things like for every 6 seconds a driver spends texting, 4.6 of those seconds are with their eyes off the road, which makes texting the most dangerous cell phone activity anyone can engage in while operating a 5,000 pound piece of steel and glass. This activity produces 6,000 highway deaths a year and that number is rising.
I decided to do something about it after my three year old daughter was nearly run down right in front of me by a texting driver last fall. Instead of an expensive shackle that locks down phones and alienates the user (especially teens) I built a tool called OTTER that is a simple app for smartphones - low cost, no recurring fees. This IS a better way to text and drive (via a GPS based Texting Auto Reply) and its saving lives right now...
Erik Wood, owner
OTTER LLC
http://www.OTTERapp.com
http://www.prlog.org/10871927.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Article: There A Better Way To Text While Driving?
An app is not doing anything other than using technology to force people to stop texting while driving and is likely only be installed by people who are already convinced not to text while driving. Your low download numbers in the android market illustrate this point.
Yes texting and driving is dangerous, but simply hiding from the issue will not help.
Accepting the fact that people are going to text and drive is the first step towards reducing the risks.
Hands free voice control is the most effective way to minimize the risk, if you don't have to look at your phone then texting is no more dangerous than taking a call hands free. This does not reduce the risk to zero (just look at the studies that show how ineffective hands free driving laws are at reducing accident rates), but it is a definite improvement over traditional texting.
Once we accept the fact that people are going to do dumb, dangerous things while driving (yes this includes texting) then we can work to minimize the risks.
Airbags were invented by engineers looking to keep occupants who were not wearing a seat belt safer, they were intended to replace seat belts not supplement them when originally thought up. Technology should be used to minimize the risks to people, even if their own decisions created those risks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Outlaw automatic transmissions!
I admit I am tempted to text while driving my motorcycle, but I quickly come to my senses and pull over to do it. However, if you do feel that there must be a need to do so, the first thing you should do is disable all the airbags and install a large spike in the center of your steering wheel, then proceed with texting.
It's human nature that as cars become more safe, we've continued to push the limits of safety.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
people are going to do stupid things
So rather than sticking our collective heads in the sand and shouting don't text and drive we should utilize technology to minimize the risks involved. Voice control software is rapidly improving. For example the Genius Button software on the T-Mobile Mytouch Slide has a driving mode that will announce an incoming text and the sender's name, read the text to you, allow you to reply, it will read your message back to you for confirmation, and finaly send the reply, all completely hands free without ever needing to look at the phone. The voice to text options available on other android handsets is also good but requires more interaction with the phone to use.
The thing that makes text messaging more dangerous than calling is that you have to take your eyes off the road to look at the message. Complete voice control systems like this eliminate the need to look at the phone. That does not completely eliminate the risk, but should lower it to roughly the same as having a conversation.
People are going to do stupid things, and that includes texting/ calling/ eating/ putting on makeup/ reading the newspaper/ etc while driving.
It is in the best interests of everyone to minimize the impact as much as possible through technology.
For full disclosure, I do work for T-mobile and typed this on my Mytouch Slide ( but not while driving).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The stupidity that anything is that important that it require an immediate response demonstrates a complete disrespect for others and a narcissism that borders on the incomprehensible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(only when there aren't cars nearby, naturally)
Hell, I do that when I'm not driving. Works great.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Phone / Car Interface
The other part of the puzzle is an interface between the car and the phone. Bluetooth may be nice enough for basic voice communication while in the car, but I'd like it if my car interacted with my phone for maps and data as well. I like having the display built into the car, I don't want to pay for a secondary plan for my car. I also keep my car a lot longer than I want to keep my cell phone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Texting and driving
So far theres been ongoing attempts at eliminating texting while behind the wheel, but the safest way to deal with your phone while driving is to not use it.
Now there's an App for that, NOTXT Communications, Inc. of Orlando, Fla. today announced the creation of a new App for the Blackberry and other smart phones called NOTXT™, that allows owners to disable texting and other functions while a user is driving. NOTXT™costs just $2.99 no other costs are associated with the Application.
Available for Blackberry and other smart phones August 2010.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Texting
Car and Driver actually did a study on texting and driving and how it is actually worse than drunk driving: http://www.plg-pllc.com/uncategorized/texting-while-driving-worse-than-drunk-drivingwashington-perso nal-injury-lawyer/
They have also decided that even with the use of hands-free devices drivers are still distracted enough by being on the phone to involve themselves in auto accidents easily.
Texting while driving is not worth the consequences and while driving the road alone should be ones focus.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Deal with that. Seriously, deal with it.
Don't give me any crap about luck because that's a cop out. There's not some mysterious force in the universe looking out for me. I'm just a better driver than you. Why not try to learn how instead of saying people can't do it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
new kind of cell phone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]