Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Cablevision For Depriving People Of Fox On TV
from the oh-please dept
It seems the whole retransmission fight in NY between Cablevision and Fox gets sillier by the day. After Fox accused Cablevision of pointing people to websites with unauthorized streams of various sporting events, Cablevision announced that it would reimburse anyone who ordered Major League Baseball's internet playoff package to watch the World Series (legally) over the internet. Apparently, that's not enough for some people, who have filed a silly class action lawsuit against Cablevision for not discounting their bills during the Fox fight. They're claiming this was a breach of contract, because it represents a "material change" to the service. I can understand why people are annoyed, but this certainly feels like yet another class action lawsuit which is just about lawyers trying to squeeze money out of a company, rather than any serious public concern. Adding weight to that claim is the fact that they're asking for a whopping $450 million -- saying that the customers are seriously harmed by missing Fox's "distinctive viewpoint in the political speech arena... just days before a critical mid-term election." Oh and, of course, being deprived of The Simpsons, Glee, and football and baseball are seriously damaging to the psyche. Or something like that.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: class action, fox, tv
Companies: cablevision, fox, news corp.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Whopping... not so much.
That being said, I think a lawsuit against either side (Fox or Cablevision) is foolish and a waste.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Whopping... not so much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Whopping... not so much.
Cablevision should just put an amplified digital receiver in their cable boxes and have it pickup the broadcast channels from the air. If a customer complains that they aren't getting the channel Cablevision should put an antenna up somewhere in or on the house (could they use the cable as an antenna?). That will be cheaper than paying the ridiculous fees that the broadcasters' demand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Whopping... not so much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wasn't Fox that demanded Cablevision pay up or live without it?
If it ever comes out that this lawsuit was instigated by Fox that would not surprise me, maybe Cablevision should get those same people to also sue Fox for breach of contract.
In the end is all ridiculous but.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I say we all sue for forcing cable companies to pay to rebroadcast FREE OVER THE AIR content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is so silly?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What is so silly?
Rebroadcast rights are a contractual corcern. Each cable company has a signed contract with each of the channels it carries. These contracts have built-in cost adjustments that allow for the broadcasters to offset tech/marketing/etc costs.
What these companies like FOX and viacom are doing is extorting cable companies to get much higher retransmit rate hikes than the contract allows for. (Example, the TWC: Viacom fight was TWC agreed to 12% increase, viacom wanted 42%) They extort the cable industry by saying "Give us x percentage more, or we will pull our channels" Then to pressure those companies, FOX and others broadcast propaganda that the cable companies are willfully dropping ther content. When those companies cave in, they pass those costs straight on to the consumer.
This is extortion, and the FCC/Government is starting to take a good look at the practice. God I hope they stop this shit in it's tracks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What is so silly?
This is extortion, and the FCC/Government is starting to take a good look at the practice. God I hope they stop this shit in it's tracks.
In this case, would strong competition in the cable market even solve it? I'm not sure that it would, and if not, what would the FCC be able to do? Setting prices is generally bad. I don't know, I'm just not seeing a solution really.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: What is so silly?
The Cable co.s should not be punished for standing up against extortion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Give In
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Give In
Yes, people are stupid and easily led astray by the great Satan that is lawyer.
That is all....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Give In
Though I find it hard to believe that this came up on it's own without some prodding by a party that stands to profit either way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
if ppl payed for a service that CV or any other company for that matter did not provide then THEY SHOULD BE LIABLE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fox is a major network. It makes up 20% of the Network coverage, not to mention all the various other channels that Fox provides. If Cablevision is now providing a reduced service, they should reduce the bill by an appropriate amount.
After all, if they were adding a bunch of channels, they'd expect you to pay more, so with a reduction in channels, shouldn't you pay less?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Updated..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Updated..
The term "distinctive viewpoint in the political speech arena..." was a dead giveaway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This seems like a Tea Party Tactic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"...Lawsuit Filed Against Cablevision For Depriving People Of Fox.."
};P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
umm...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: umm...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: umm...
Comment by imbrucy, Oct 28th, 2010 @ 1:01pm
Comment by Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased), Oct 28th, 2010 @ 2:35pm
Comment by Rekrul, Oct 28th, 2010 @ 3:06pm
You're not even the first person who's been told that it's already been mentioned that other stations are involved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cablevision should call for Boycott
Then they should notify all the advertisers that paid millions of dollars to Newscorp to have their commercials aired are not reaching the total potential customer market that they contracted for. Perhaps those advertisers will apply pressure on Newscorp, forcing them to reconsider their current action against cablevision,and the cable/dish provider industry in general.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Real Issue
News Flash: Because we're the idiots who fund it!
If people would ever put their money where their mouths are, they'd stop attending and watching sporting events until these fat cats learn to deal with a smaller pie. The pie is too big. Lower salaries, lower prices...simple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There Should Be A Class Action Against News12/Optimum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]