Let's Play A Game: Anarchist Or Photo Op?
from the take-your-pic dept
Last week, there were student protests in the UK, concerning massively increased fees, and apparently on the fringes of the protests there was some violence, which of course the press picked up on, because "if it bleeds, it leads." Or, in this case, if it "kicks in a glass window, it leads." Apparently a whole bunch of newspapers all carried the same photo on their front covers. I've posted all nine such covers after the jump, but here are a couple just to give you the idea:Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, cropping, journalism, photographs
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Photo-op indeed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing new
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From the perspective of the editing, the photographers in frame aren't interesting, and detract from the feeling of 'pure rage' from the protesters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I suppose 49 of them are just prop actors, and only 1 of them is a professional.
....actually, that wouldn't surprise me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And the photographers spoiling the 'pure rage' feeling? well, we wouldn't want something like reality or even reader-interpretation to de-sensationalize the news, now would we?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
They have been good fear-mongering mouthpieces for decades, no sense starting to hold them accountable to the law like commoners.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get my best side...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Get my best side...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Get my best side...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mind you, the political party whose headquarters is being wrecked in that picture is also slashing the police budget, which will mean lay-offs and a gutted pension scheme. One can't help but feel that even if the police had been capable of putting down the riot, their hearts wouldn't really have been in it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The Express pic actually seems to be from a slightly different position as well, a bit to the right.
Only the Express pic seems to show the expansive gaggle of photogs as well.
The cropped version is a great shot, imo, if not telling the whole story. Not surprised it's being so widely used.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
agent provocateur
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St1-WTc1kow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: agent provocateur
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wonder how many of those Newspapers Rupert Murdoch owns...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm sure they only used the ones from that side because they capture that little fire there as well.
It looks like he kicked the glass several times, which is probably why everyone had time to set up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Knock, knock Neo.
Wake up, the Matrix has you Neo!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One more thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: One more thing
Everyone just wants the government to enforce their own version of what they think the rules should be. People who claim they want "less" government are full of crap and just want differently focused rules.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: One more thing
You would make a terrible anarchist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: One more thing
> Without rules, whoever can will obviously just take over and makes their own rules
> Everyone just wants the government to enforce their own version of what they think the rules should be
You should look up Libertarianism - by which I mean the modern sense of the term. It avoids both these pitfalls by making it the government's job to protect individual rights and *nothing else*. The principle is to remove the initiation of force and fraud from human relationships.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: One more thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: One more thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: One more thing: Libertarianism is a disguise for plutocracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: One more thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: One more thing
1. The theory or doctrine that all forms of government are oppressive and undesirable and should be abolished.
2. Active resistance and terrorism against the state, as used by some anarchists.
3. Rejection of all forms of coercive control and authority:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: One more thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: One more thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: One more thing
My favorite illustration of this is from Something Positive: http://somethingpositive.net/sp12102002.shtml
"This is anarchy! Where the strong rule the weak and guess where your place is Puglsey? Anarchy is your sixth grade gym class for all eternity!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Photo Ops
I don't know if this is a smoking gun, since at the Toronto G20, the photographers almost outnumbered protesters and police combined. It wouldn't have taken them long to close ranks around this guy.
Anyways, the experience here in Toronto proved that the thing to look out for is the feint rather than outright provocation. The police drove a bunch of police cars up, menaced the crowd briefly, then fell back - an open invitation to douchebaggery in the service of globalization. http://www.cp24.com/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20100626/100626_G20_protests/20100626/
From the article:
James Ruehle, a 49-year-old contractor from Pickering, a half hour's drive from Toronto, saw the burning of the three police cruisers.
Ruehle was stopped in his truck at the lights at the corner of King and Bay streets in the city's financial district as the protesters approached.
Three police vehicles zipped past the line of traffic into the intersection, where they stopped with lights flashing. A group of about 20 to 30 police then began to congregate but an officer Ruehle thought was a police captain ordered them back.
"The cop was yelling at them 'Back up!' 'Put your batons down!"' said Ruehle.
The police in the cars, he said, then amazed him by backing off, leaving the cruisers running in the middle of the intersection with their lights flashing and doors open.
"It was like an invitation G(to the protesters)," said Ruehle.
~~~~~~
Guess what images were all over the media?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This just in: pointing a camera at someone changes their behavior
Of course the same applies to officials and law-enforcement: as soon as there's awareness of a camera, postures/tone/behavior changes.
You can't fully trust any photo or video as an accurate representation of the same area without a camera.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Take a small child sobbing and sobbing because he or she didn't get their way. They stop long enough to look out of the cradle of their arm to make sure you still see them and cry even louder.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's up with the glass?
Now that I look even closer, those aren't three different pictures taken within a fraction of a second, those are three different kicks. That's why the one guy isn't in the Guardian picture, he had time to walk out of frame.
Unless that guy was acting, that glass should have changed is some significant way. That guy didn't do that damage to that window.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What's up with the glass?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
call it....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Back to School
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3221110/Rioting-students-storm-Tory-HQ.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: One more thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]