DailyDirt: Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200...

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Sometimes, a free market doesn't create a thriving bazaar of competition. Occasionally, huge monopolies form, and the result is less competition (and sometimes less innovation). Maybe it doesn't matter if you own Mediterranean and Baltic Avenue, but it could if you have Park Place and Boardwalk. Here are a few examples of monopolies you might run into someday. If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: beer, competition, diamonds, eye wear, glasses, innovation, monopoly
Companies: anheuser-busch inbev, debeers, grupo modelo, luxottica, sabmiller


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    silverscarcat (profile), 5 Mar 2013 @ 4:04pm

    Boardwalk? PAH!

    Real Monopoly players always strive for New York Avenue and the orange corner.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    A Dan (profile), 5 Mar 2013 @ 5:14pm

    The beer merger

    If you listen to Planet Money's podcast on the potential beer merger, it's really interesting. Apparently the big two act together with price increases, and it's only the competition from Corona that keeps the beer prices down. It definitely sounds like it's anti-competitive, not an acquisition because they really like the company.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), 5 Mar 2013 @ 5:35pm

      Re: The beer merger

      If you listen to Planet Money's podcast on the potential beer merger, it's really interesting. Apparently the big two act together with price increases, and it's only the competition from Corona that keeps the beer prices down. It definitely sounds like it's anti-competitive, not an acquisition because they really like the company.

      Yes, was about to post the same basic comment. Here's the link: http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2013/02/23/172724026/episode-438-mavericks-monopolies-and-beer

      The key point is not so much that they would control 46% of the market, but that the much smaller Grupo Modelo refuses to go alone with InBev and Miller raise prices, thus forcing them to keep their pricing lower. So the potential antitrust issue is not necessarily the size of the market, but the market harm that will result from wiping out the one player who seems willing to go against attempts to bump up prices.

      Really interesting stuff.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Robin Townsend, 5 Mar 2013 @ 6:44pm

    Stumbleupon

    Linking your readers to a previous techdirt article is cool. Sending us to another website to view it (stumbleupon), is not.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Michael Ho (profile), 5 Mar 2013 @ 8:42pm

      Re: Stumbleupon

      Really? We do it to promote our posts, obviously. You don't have to click on the link?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Robin Townsend, 6 Mar 2013 @ 12:26am

        Re: Re: Stumbleupon

        It speaks to integrity. If you are going to send someone to another website -to view yours- tell them. In this case,you are not promoting techdirt (your readers are already here) you are promoting stumbleupon.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Michael Ho (profile), 6 Mar 2013 @ 12:53pm

          Re: Re: Re: Stumbleupon

          Robin,

          Oh. you're actually totally right. The last line of our DailyDirt posts used to have a bit about StumbleUpon recommendations, but somehow (without thinking), I forgot about that part when I copy/pasted/edited... and I've been omitting our shout out to StumbleUpon by mistake.

          I'll add a "via StumbleUpon" to let people know that's where the link is taking them.... We're not trying to fool anyone or anything like that, the omission was an honest mistake.

          Apologies.

          Mike

          link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    ShellMG, 5 Mar 2013 @ 9:57pm

    The cost of eyewear...

    ...is a serious bummer when you need high index lenses, can't wear rimless frames and your eye doc keeps asking if you're ready for bifocals.

    i've worn glasses since I was 7. I will always be grateful for the invention of high index lenses but when you add on the cost of a decent pair of frames and Crizal...yeowch.

    I hope Google comes up with a way to add a script to their lenses. That would be crazy-cool.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 6 Mar 2013 @ 6:29am

    diamonds are not the most thermodynamically stable form of carbon by a long shot. that the hell are you talking about, where in that article does it talk about the thermodynamic stability of carbon ? or diamonds (which is just carbon).

    It's also been common knowledge for 20 years that if De Beers put all the diamonds they have in holding on the market it would result in the complete collapse of diamond prices.

    the biggest market by far for diamonds are for industrial use, not for gems.

    how much money would you spend in your life on diamonds (even if you marry hundreds of times) compared to how much money you would spend on electricity or fuel for your car !!

    if fact your car and it's fuel would cost a great deal more to product if diamonds were not cheaply available for industrial use. Try drilling for oil without a diamond drill bit !!!!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 6 Mar 2013 @ 7:33am

    "...46% of the US beer market would be controlled by a single company."

    Now all they need to do is buy Hostess and make Twinkie beer.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ryan, 6 Mar 2013 @ 10:27am

    "...46% of the US beer market would be controlled by a single company."

    Methinks you're playing fast and loose with the definition of the word 'beer'.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Crashoverride (profile), 6 Mar 2013 @ 3:44pm

    The seven page article on Diamonds was amazingly detailed. Even more fascinating was the fact that the article was written thirty years ago.... making all the more interesting the fact that a thirty year old article got posted to the internet.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.