Copyright Maximalism Never Rests: TPP Talks Continue In Singapore
from the unfortunate dept
Despite growing protests and concerns about the next big US trade agreement (with Europe), the discussions on the Trans Pacific Partnership continue to move forward, with the latest round taking place in Singapore this week. And... once again, it's a story of near complete secrecy, and a total lack of transparency. Of key concern, of course, are the sections of the agreement on patents and copyrights, which the public has not seen. There was a leak from over two years ago, but nothing since then. The USTR and others say that they want the agreement completed by this fall, and it is a complete travesty that they have not been willing to share the details publicly. Negotiating a treaty in complete secrecy -- especially when the "input" on the IP chapter is driven by industry stakeholders, rather than the public -- means that the treaty almost certainly is going to be a disaster that is harmful to the public.What's most amazing is that the USTR doesn't seem to recognize that the playing field has changed since the last time they did this. The rejection of SOPA, followed by the widespread rejection of ACTA (even if the USTR is in total denial about this) shows that the public is not at all willing to accept backroom deals that fundamentally expand bad patent and copyright policies around the globe and (worse) lock us in to things that the public does not believe are legitimate.
The USTR's continued insistence on secrecy, combined with the few leaks of information showing just how extreme a position they're setting out for themselves on patents and copyrights, suggests an organization so totally out of touch that it is destroying its own credibility. Any reasonable organization would recognize that the old backroom negotiations method of creating these kinds of deals is no longer acceptable. That the USTR refuses to admit this only increases awareness of just how out of touch the organization and its leadership remain.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, ip, negotiations, patents, secrecy, singapore, tpp, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
USTR you are a group of Corrupt A-Hole Human Monkey Beings.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stakeholders
Banking, whether central or not, is a method of centralizing control over the economy. When the government ceases taking payment of taxes in kind or in labor and begins to force us to pay taxes in little paper notes issued by a separate group of private interests, we are in effect being put in the service of these said individuals.
Intellectual property creates a situation where non-physical goods can be commoditized and thus plugged into this same system.
Limited liability ensures the owners cannot be held accountable. Corporate owners enjoy immunity to lawsuits similar to the immunity the government itself enjoys.
The stakeholders are the owners, and have been for pretty much all of human history. We are less, and not more free, than medieval man.
You are attacking only one branch of the system. Seek out the root. The root is the very concept of owning anything that one does not make themselves or else trade for. If you are not attacking rule by ownership, you are not attacking the actual problem. If there is no rule by ownership, then IP becomes immaterial. Rule must be consensus based, truly of by and for the people rather than merely nominally so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Losing hope.
I guess all goes to "might is right" mindset which is sad to be honest, I still want to believe that this madness can be stopped somehow, but the most logical/cynical side of me tells me that it is almost certain that the battle is already lost, and seeing how the USTR is trying to resurrect ACTA, and I have no doubt they will bully other countries to get the 6 ratifications needed, and at this point I think they will succeed.
Only time will tell, I hope the public (me included) will be able to rally against this the same way as with SOPA/PIPA and ACTA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
when, in the course of human events
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I mean this in the nicest way possible, but you appear to be living in a fantasy land.
I mean, maybe in some parallel dimension, but what you describe above is not reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Bollocks.
The idiots in copyright land have been bleating about piracy for decades.
VCRs, cassette recorders, MP3 players, Minidisc players, CD burners and many more were all accused of being tools of piracy when they first came out, they were all supposed to bring the death of entertainment. Take your head out of your arse and do some research.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dONT SAY i DIDNT SAY THIS..
Do you make much of it PUBLIC? as in the meeting?
NO..
We need to find the MAIN group.
The ones we are seeing are only the Enterouge(sp) the FOREST, that is hiding the trees.
Think about it..the ones we see..arnt the ones deciding WHAT is to be done.
We need the NAMEs of the idiots in the background. WE need to MAKE them HEAR US..OR make/show them the PATH to doing things RIGHT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Instead of protesting just this one treaty, we need to protest the douchebags behind it. Get Ron Kirk's ass fired. Find what lobbyists have been buying him. Find who else they've talked to and get those people fired too. Make public figures afraid to even court ideas from the IP industries.
Let's turn the internet into political poison. Stand up and say, "This is ours, touch it and die!" (Die is not to be construed as a threat, is referring to their political careers).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Well at an average of 6 treaties per year (assuming they will accelerate), that would take just over 79,000 years. So if human civilization is still around, I doubt anyone but historians will remember what the word "copyright" means. It will be like those laws you laugh about, banning eating a pickle in public on Mondays.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up at same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Techdirt fanboys are totally committed to free speech -- which to them means links to infringing content!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What this means
Web sites are not going to get it done. Even EFF and Demand Progress are not organizing boots on the ground. I went to several Occupy Austin meetings and never got much support either.
At some point you are going to have to leverage your tech savvy into something sustainable that presses forward with reform rather than constantly fighting a rear guard retreat against what looks more and more like the inevitable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]