Court Rejects Publicity Rights Claim Over Pixar's Lead Car In Cars
from the publicity-rights-over-cars?!? dept
We've talked a lot lately about the rise of "publicity rights" as a new, and dangerous, area of the law that is being used to stifle forms of speech. The idea behind it was somewhat admirable. It was to prevent companies from pretending someone famous endorsed their product when they did not. But the law has been stretched and stretched and stretched in ridiculous ways with a series of ridiculous rulings. Thankfully, the courts don't always let the really ridiculous cases go forward, such as the case where Mark Brill claims that Disney/Pixar's movie Cars violated his publicity rights, because he owns a racecar that looks similar to the lead character in the movie, Lightning McQueen (voiced by Owen Wilson). The article notes that "Apparently Brill is a big deal in the racing world and is closely associated with such a car." Of course, if he was that big of a deal, you would think that doing a Google image search for "Mark Brill, race car" would turn up some images. And I can't find any... Either way, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals has upheld a lower court's summary judgment against Brill, saying:"a fictional, talking, driver-less red race car with the number 95 on it cannot be construed as a likeness of a driver of a similarly colored/numbered race car."Nice to know there are some limits on publicity rights.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cars, mark brill, movies, publicity rights
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
/sadface
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh, Oklahoma
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
McQueen? Hmmm, that name rings a bell
Was that some sort of infringement of publicity rights?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: McQueen? Hmmm, that name rings a bell
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: McQueen? Hmmm, that name rings a bell
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: McQueen? Hmmm, that name rings a bell
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If he was such a big deal in racing you'd think this would have come up earlier and he'd probably be easier to find on the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Found it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Found it
/sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Found it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Found it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Race Car
Not that it helped finding an image, but racecar is one word (despite spell check on this site not liking it - perhaps I spelled it backwards).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just wondering
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just wondering
I suppose, although its a stupid pre-emptive suite and his car & the cartoon character look nothing alike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And again....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]