Civil Liberties Groups Worried About Hungarian Media Censorship Just As Hungary Takes Over EU Presidency
from the timing-is-everything dept
We had already discussed how Hungary's new media censorship laws seemed particularly draconian -- requiring all reporting to be sufficiently "balanced" or the media may receive a fine and all media must reveal their sources. It appears the new law is getting a lot more attention, as its coincides with Hungary taking over the Presidency of the EU. Civil liberties groups are protesting the new law and calling for a media blackout. I'd be surprised if any such blackout is effective but having more people speak out in general about such laws hopefully will lead the Hungarian government to reconsider its policies.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: civil liberties, hungary, journalism, regulations
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Effectiveness
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The title "President of the EU" is inaccurate and meaningless (I know this comes from Mike), the role that Hungary has is President of the Council of the European Union (Not to be confused with President of the EU Commission, or President of the European council).
The only real 'power' that they have is to set the agenda for the council of the European Union. It's the least powerful of the three commonly misunderstood "EU President" roles.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its the same in the US, its the same in most places, but tell the real story please Mike.
thats funny you say that now, you specifically say ALL REPORTING
But you know that is not really true right Mike ??
after all that is not what you said in your earlier article you refer us too. it will quote it for you.. incase you forget..
Apparently, any content judged not to be "politically balanced," will get fined.
There is a huge difference, most countries, including YOUR'S does the same thing, both in the media and in politics, The UK does it, equal time, and political balance, the right of reply and so on.
And it is not controlled by the ruling government, it is control by the laws. The governments have to obey the laws just like anyone else.
The opposition parties will not let them get away with it not being balanced. That applies in every country..
So does censorship, you do not think everything you see and hear on TV and radio has not been past censors first ?
No matter where you live ?
I live in Australia, We have laws ensuring balance in political reporting, we also have rules about fair and unbiased, and ethical reporting. And many rules regarding that, unlike you Mike, real reporters, have to live by ethical standards, they cannot generally just make up stuff they think some people will believe.
So I find it hard to understand who you can be at all surprised that hungry is doing what every other country does including USA, there are a few that do not, but they are usually dictatorships.. not democracies.
And when you remove censorship from the US then you can comment about other countries censorship laws, how is it any more or less draconian that what you're elected officials do ?? what they should do, and what they were elected into Government to do.. like it or not..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its the same in the US, its the same in most places, but tell the real story please Mike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its the same in the US, its the same in most places, but tell the real story please Mike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its the same in the US, its the same in most places, but tell the real story please Mike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its the same in the US, its the same in most places, but tell the real story please Mike.
Darryl has promised recently that he only speaks in factual terms and would apologize if he did not. I called him out over the weekend for a lie, and he (not surprisingly) ignored it.
Yet here he is, yet again, making a false claim that the US has a right of reply law. It does not.
Furthermore, he falsely is claiming that the new Hungarian law is simply a right to reply law. He ignores that it's much more than that. This is not just a right to reply, but a law that says if the *initial* story is not balanced enough you can be fined.
On top of that there's the requirement that people hand over sources, which has nothing to do with a right to reply.
So, Darryl is 100% wrong yet again, while insisting that he deals only in facts. Will he admit it? Let's wait and see...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]