Some Free Letter-Writing Advice For America's Toughest Sheriff
from the there,-fixed-that-for-you dept
Everyone, no matter how great they might think they are, can benefit from the services of a good editor, especially when they are writing an important document. Say, for example, you were self-proclaimed "America's Toughest Sheriff" and everybody-else-proclaimed "Kind Of A Dick" Joe Arpaio (sheriff for Maricopa County, Arizona), and you had just used Craigslist to catch and arrest two literal dogfuckers before they could get down to their despicable business (thanks to BigKeithO for sending this in). Naturally you would be appreciative of Craigslist for helping you find these people and prevent any pooch-porking, so you might decide to write CEO Jim Buckmaster a nice thank you letter. Unfortunately, without proper editing, that letter might instead accidentally convey the ridiculous notion that you are actually angry at Craigslist for being so useful, and that you believe it contributes to the problem of bestiality. It might even come close to suggesting that you would rather these mutt-divers keep talking about bending Rover over but do it behind closed doors—and that would be downright insane.
Such a letter, it seems, has just been written [pdf]. For the public good, I am providing my editing services free of charge to Sheriff Arpaio, in order to clarify what I assume was his intended point, since shaming Craigslist for helping you get doggy-diddlers off the street is obviously nonsensical. Sheriff Arpaio's complete letter follows, with my recommended edits marked in bold or strikethrough.
Dear Mr. Buckmaster:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office detectives conducted an undercover investigation that spanned several months during 2010 and 2011. This investigation resulted in the arrest of two individuals for conspiracy to commit bestiality. There is an ongoing investigation of several others. Craigslist provided the forum for these individuals to post, in a very blatant manner, their intentions. We are able to locate and communicate with these suspects using Craigslist. Thank you.
During the course of the investigation numerous other posts were discovered in the Personals sections of "men seeking men" and "casual encounters". These posts included specific description of criminal acts. They were often accompanied by graphic photographs of a fully nude male in various pornographic situations. This constitutes excellent evidence for the State. Again, thank you.
It is clear that the "self-policing" protocol Craigslist relies upon to prevent this activity is inadequate, but its mere existence is already going above and beyond your legal duty.WhileNot only is Craigslistmaynotbecommitting a criminal act, you are undoubtedly providing a mechanism to facilitateobvious criminal activityour law enforcement efforts.SimplyThe fact that you continue posting your "Terms of Use" and providing a mechanism for posters to doYOUR job,and claiming thateven though Craigslist is legally "not responsible for the content" is thoroughlydisappointingimpressive.
As the Sheriff of one of the largest law enforcement agencies in the nation, I, not you, am responsible forthe conduct of my entire organizationenforcing the law. In this regard, I strongly encourage Craigslist and you, specifically, Mr. Buckmaster, to acceptgreater responsibility for your organizationmy personal thanks for helping us get two perverts off the streets.
I ask that you re-evaluate the security measures that you utilize to prevent this type of activity and take the necessary action to improve your procedure.Now if you'll excuse me, I have some pink underwear to sell.
Sincerely,
Joseph M. Arpaio
Sheriff
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: craigslist, evidence, joe arpaio
Companies: craigslist
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Uh-huh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ok, cool. Can we get back to the technological dirt now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bravo
With regards to the sheriff, how can people actually come to the conclusion that craigslist is bad that soon after using it for the forces of good? I will never understand these law enforcement types (officers, sheriffs, attorney generals, etc). I think they must watch too much mainstream news on the TV so they actually believe that 'teh interwebs' and technology are bringing about the world apocalypse here in 2012 unless they can manage to tame it.
Average confused law person: "Wait, what is that you say? Google is coming out with a new service? You must run for your lives! I will protect you by sending them menacing letters asking them to go far beyond the scope of the law. Everybody knows that this technology corrupts the youth of America! *mumbles* now if I can just get the news to stop showing that crime happens everyone will believe I am the best at my job evar! */mumbles*"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bravo
Imagine a newsletter set up and distributed secretly with the express purpose of arragning criminal acts. Even if the police get ahold of this document and use it to track down criminals, isn't the newsletter itself bad? Despite it being used for good, none of the evil would have happened without the newsletter.
Imagine a seedy bar where patrons are able to congregate for less-than-legal activities. Even if the cops are able to steak-out the place and catch criminals, isn't the bar it'self bad? None of the evil would have happened if there wasn't a site set up to commit the acts.
That's how cops can take a good thing like Craigslist and only see the bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bravo
I envy your naivete. I too was once as ignorant about how the world works as you appear to be.
Not to worry--with any luck you'll survive the process of becoming educated in that regard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Bravo
My bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bravo
The bar is neutral, it's just a place. The act is bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bravo
This is more akin to a bar where most people go and enjoy themselves, but some of the ladies are there to make a buck. They advertise their, um, wares and a fellow takes her up on it and they go do the deed in his car in the parking lot.. or at a nearby hotel.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bravo
Craigslist already goes out of their way to help beyond what the law requires. As Marcas points out, they should be being thanked.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Bravo
I'd much rather have a clean Craigslist then one supposedly "helping" law enforcement. If there was nothing posted there, there wouldn't be a problem. I can hear it... "but but but, they'd go elsewhere!!!one" Where? Name alternatives. Local ones. Good ones. Your local paper? They won't advertise crackwhores. If they do, move. It's common sense that seems to lack here. Why do you think every anonymous commenters are referred to as "cowards" and "trolls"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
No more paedophile rings/networks, no more prostitution, blah, blah, blah.
ooops! Sorry just went off on a complete fruitloop there!
These things happen, you cannot stop them from happening no matter how much you think you can, even in the biggest police state where everyone is monitored 24/7/365 bad things will happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
And I said "can't see" not "can't control." Either way, the point is you don't know what you don't know, and I'd be doubtful that other avenues aren't available to those who care to take them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
In the case of prostitution, how does that make anyone safer? The ones who stop just because they can't advertise on Craigslist are unlikely to be the ones most at risk. Those who don't stop will have less choice in how to advertise, potentially making them less safe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
You're basically saying you don't care whether it's happening or not as long as you can't see it. The rest of us would rather the problem were visible, so that it can be addressed appropriately, rather than hidden from the authorities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
How does disallowing the advertising of prostitution make anyone safer?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
The problem is assuming that "they can't advertise here" means "they can't advertise anywhere," or at least the mistaken belief that you'll be able to stop all advertising everywhere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
As you point out, this is a flawed premise. Prostitution was around before Craigslist, but prostitutes were more likely to be walking the streets. Advertising via Craigslist would seem to me to be safer than walking the streets. Prostitution in itself is not a safety issue, but it has a lot of safety issues associated with it. Giving prostitutes more power to choose who they have contact with seems like a better way to deal with some of those issues than banning prostitution, which makes the issues worse for those who ignore the ban.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
Err, how would this alleged prostitution on Craiglist make me feel "unsafe"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
That aside, sweeping the problem under the rug and out of sight just because craigslist is high profile doesn't make it go away. And I am sorry I am not part of those types of groups so I don't really know any of their alternatives. Since you are looking for them though I am sure you could do some searching of your own. I feel no need to search out alternatives for those types of activities, but for other things that I do know about, like legally modding the hardware I bought, I know that if you shut down one source, it moves elsewhere, and is not hard to find once you are in the group.
As a final note, you are the one promoting a false sense of security. With it out in the open, where police can track down criminals, that kind of exemplifies the opposite of a false sense of security. The world you want where you can't see it but it still happens is the false sense of security.
You seem to have gotten both the idea of false security and trolling backwards in one post. Bravo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Bravo
Sorry, no; I'm explaining how other people could confuse the tool, since that's what the GP was asking about. I was using Their Voice, but I didn't mean to imply that's a belief I held; sorry it wasn't clear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bravo
> place and catch criminals
Cops don't use steak-outs anymore. Too expensive. They use hamburger or chicken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bravo
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dammit!
Oh, and real men must wear pink.
Next time, he's selling ballerina outfits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
editing
when this post went through the rss feed all of the text was showing, including the struck text. at first glimpse it appeared that your new letter made no sense whatsoever. now that i read it on this page it makes a little more sense. in terms of dealing with sheriff joe: you might as well slam your head against the wall several times. it might not fix the situation, but it will feel better than trying wrap your head around joe logic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Btw, did you know that those were his real life parents in the van? They had absolutely no clue what he was going to say either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Go ahead and think me prudish, but I follow the belief that those that use cuss words in daily dialog don't have the intelligence to use the rest of the English language.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You're right, i really should have shown more respect to the dignified institution of Canine Copulation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
there's usually a polite way of saying most things without resorting to the hyper formal, at least.
personally i'm not really going to object, (and do find it to be amusing and certainly fit the situation) but the point is valid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I find it ironic that the dignified institution of Canine Copulation is more humorous to me than dogfuckers and I couldn't care less about swearing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
On the flip side, I very rarely use them in public, because regardless of what I think of others' beliefs on this subject, I still try to show them respect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
> the belief that those that use cuss words in
> daily dialog don't have the intelligence to
> use the rest of the English language.
That doesn't indicate prudishness on your part so much as an almost willful stupidity, equating one's word choice with innate intelligence. Some of the most brilliant wordsmiths in history have also used vulgarities with both frequency and panache in their daily speech.
You apparently need to disabuse yourself of the notion that merely having aesthetic tastes different than yours indicates a lack of intelligence.
It does not. All it indicates is that their aesthetic tastes are different than yours. Nothing more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The reply
Some asshole is writing stupid letters to me and signing your name to them.
Sincerely,
Jim Buckmaster
President and CEO, Craigslist
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sh*t or get off the pot
Sincerely,
Every Citizen of this great country
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sh*t or get off the pot
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Missed Opportunity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hey mister
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dogs
this is what the worlds tuffest sheriff is spending tax money on?
there are no drug dealers? no murderers? no rapists? no illegals?
once again, i am confused by the priorites of my government.
rama
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: dogs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: dogs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let me explain, and this is a totally true story, I worked in a bar where people were selling cocaine out of the bathrooms. When the police cracked down, you'd better believe they put it on our shoulders to police the behavior of our patrons in that regard, or else the bar would be shut down.
Same principle in regards to serving drinks. If a person becomes intoxicated and hurts/injures somebody or themselves, every bar/establishment that the person entered becomes responsible for his intoxicated state, regardless of whether he was "drunk" when he left a particular bar. The only way to safeguard against such accusations is to wholly refuse to serve the person when they entered, but if they weren't visibly intoxicated (nevermind that they're going to bars IN ORDER to get drunk) then on what grounds can you refuse service?
And really I shouldn't say it falls on the bar's shoulders, in reality the BARTENDERS are often held responsible even though they're often only fulfilling the requirements of their employment.
I'm not saying any of this makes sense. I think personal responsibility should fall on the shoulders of the individual.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Responsibility
> injures somebody or themselves, every bar/
> establishment that the person entered becomes
> responsible for his intoxicated state, regardless
> of whether he was "drunk" when he left a
> particular bar.
Responsible how? Criminally responsible? Civilly responsible? Which state are you in? I'd like to see the state's code section which puts full responsibility on the Olive Garden when someone just had one glass of wine there with dinner, then heads out to some bar and gets totally plastered and irons someone out five hours later.
If such a statute actually exists, it's ripe for about a half-dozen constitutional challengnes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In a bar, you have a finite area in which to witness these acts. You had direct knowledge of them happening. One-time incidents of a patron being found in a bar with a gram of something in his pocket is not going to get the bar shut down. A booth in the bar being run with the knowledge of the bar owner is a real problem.
When you are talking about a website that allows postings without review, there is no direct knowledge of the actions. Now, you take into account that CraigsList actively searches for and removes or reports illegal activity, they have gone a step beyond. What you are suggesting is that even though they have no knowledge of the behavior, because it happened on their site, it is their fault. Ok - now apply that to your state (I'll say CT because that's where I am). Now, is the state of Connecticut RESPONSIBLE for illegal activity in the state? If so, they could and SHOULD be sued each time a crime is committed - isn't that a bit off?
"If a person becomes intoxicated and hurts/injures somebody or themselves, every bar/establishment that the person entered becomes responsible for his intoxicated state, regardless of whether he was "drunk" when he left a particular bar"
Not sure where you are, but I owned a bar in CT for awhile and can tell you that this is not the case here (and boy, we have draconian dram shop laws here). The liability is much more complex than you have stated and relies heavily on active knowledge of the person being intoxicated when they left your establishment - not when they left the next bar they went to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm
Who is "everybody else?" Not everyone thinks he's "kind of a dick." In fact, on the linked wikipedia page, where it mentions a recall effort, 75% opposed it, and his favorable rating was 65%.
And even if a lot of those people think he's a dick, he's mostly being a dick towards criminals.
If you live in AZ and don't want to end up in Tent City, it's simple: Obey the law! Don't commit a crime! It really is that easy, people.
As for the letter he sent to Craigslist.. ok, I disagree with the short-sightedness and the failure to realized that sites like Craigslist can, and do, help law enforcement solve crimes and get the "pooch-porkers" (and worse, because as disgusting as it is, there are worse criminals than the ones that want to fondle Fido) off the streets and into his prison.
Note to the the cell/tent-mates of the doggy diddlers: Do NOT dress up as McGruff the Crime Dog at the prison Halloween party this year.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm
Yeah okay - it's technically not 'everybody' or even, in terms of polls, the majority. But given that the linked Wikipedia page also lists those who have opposed him as "Amnesty International,[45] the American Civil Liberties Union, the Arizona Ecumenical Council, the American Jewish Committee,[46] and the Arizona chapter of the Anti-Defamation League" and also that he is under investigation for abuse of power by the FBI, DOJ and Federal Grand Jury, it seemed like a fair choice of phrase.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hmmm
Mike, are you losing your grip?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
And please, feel free to ignore my posts. I won't be offended and it's much, much easier than whining all the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
Anyone else think Techdirt has taken a serious downturn by letting the comment clowns do the posting?
and
Oh jeez... you get a blue box now too? Mike, are you losing your grip?
If that's your sense of humour, I think you're the one who needs to do some developing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
So actually my living depends on exactly what I love, thank you very much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
I just think it is really amusing to see you posting on a site that slags the dead tree media on a regular basis. Does your boss know what you do on company time?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100330/1003258786.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/artic les/20100201/0354087988.shtml
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100309/1552478485.shtml
I could never claim to be sure about the future of the National Post. I'm in no position to make that assessment. I simply know that they are experimenting and being innovative, and that's what I want to be involved in. So yeah - nearly everyone I work with knows what I post on techdirt. Most of them find it pretty interesting.
Anyway, I'm not sure what any of this has to do with the topic of this post, so if you want to engage in more personal attacks on me and my career, I dunno, Twitter me or something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
I think Mike would call that "flailing about uselessly" or something of similar nature. He would likely go on to discuss buggy whips and such.
You know how it goes.
What does it have to do? Nothing, just an amusing aside as we all get an better idea of the "do as I say" mentality that permeates Techdirt. Perhaps Mike will invite you over to watch a Hollywood movie at his place. You know, movies from the movie people he laments on an almost daily basis.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
And please, feel free to ignore my posts. I won't be offended, and it's much, much easier than whining all the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm
Riiight. Everyone breaks the law. We have too many of them for you not to accidentally break a few.
"It is unlawful for any person to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire or purchase any fish or wildlife or plant taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law, treaty, or regulation of the United States or in violation of any Indian tribal law or regulation of any state or any foreign law."
So its a Federal crime to have anything to do with any fish, wildlife or plant that is illegal anywhere in the world. Good luck with that ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm
> dick, he's mostly being a dick towards criminals.
It isn't even that so much that pisses a lot of non-Arizonans off. It's that he's dick toward illegal aliens. He actually enforces the law, and when it comes to illegals, that makes a lot of people mad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hmmm
Agreed. The ones that get mad are the idiots that like their tax money paying for illegal aliens to get all sorts of benefits. I prefer to decide for myself who gets my charity money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Age of Consent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thumbs down
Yuck!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thumbs down
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Thumbs down
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Thumbs down
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
services of a good editor DEPERATELY NEEDED HERE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: services of a good editor DEPERATELY NEEDED HERE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: services of a good editor DEPERATELY NEEDED HERE.
Exactly. I specifically recommended "Fido-Fucker" and "Giving the dog a bone", which are far more mature terms....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: services of a good editor DEPERATELY NEEDED HERE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: services of a good editor DEPERATELY NEEDED HERE.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Something is amiss in Techdirtland....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Something is amiss in Techdirtland....
I've heard this story a dozen times and never, ever, ever seen it confirmed. It's always just at the insistence of the parent.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110106/01591712546/report-claims-discredited-study-that- linked-vaccines-to-autism-wasnt-just-mistake-outright-fraud.shtml#c937
So because the Great Marcus Crab has never seen it, it cant possibly be true, or its just the imagination of parents. That's when I realized he is just a fancy troll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
comon...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bestiality Illegal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bestiality Illegal
and Meat is murder... tasty tasty 'good with ketchup' murder.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Bestiality Illegal
*mumbles* Philistine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When did they hire James O'Keefe as an editor?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This post is a complete waste of bits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sheriff joe
[ link to this | view in chronology ]