U2 Manager Still Blaming Everyone Else For Not Giving Him More Money... As U2 Sets Record For Highest Grossing Tour Ever
from the contrast dept
Ah, Paul McGuinness. U2's manager has been on something of a crusade over the past few years. Every few months, he pops up to blame every other industry for not paying musicians enough money. There was Google, ISPs and device makers, governments and, of course, evil bloggers. He's also claimed that free is the enemy. Anyway, he's at it again. In an interview with Sky News, he once again says that tech firms aren't doing enough to give money to musicians:"I really wish those geniuses who bring us Google, Facebook, Amazon and Spotify would get their act together," he said.The very next sentence in that article:
"It's not the downloading that's the problem. It's a bit of ingenuity and generosity that's required from the people who are making money from the internet."
Mr McGuinness was speaking after learning that U2's 360 tour, which began in Barcelona in June 2009, has now become the highest grossing of all time.So, let me get this straight. He wants the people who are making money to "get their act together" and start figuring it out how to share with others because of "generosity." So... um... can I ask, how much of this tour revenue is U2 sharing with other musicians? Just curious. And how much are they sharing it with the internet companies whose services they used to spread the news of the tour and the album? Again... just curious.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blame, music industry, paul mcguinness, u2
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
If Paul McGuinness wants more money...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If Paul McGuinness wants more money...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Erm, what? Google I can perhaps understand him having a (misguided) problem with as it can be used to find file sharing sites (as well as legal sources), but the others?
Facebook is a massive marketing tool, used by his band. Why do they need to pay him - shouldn't it be the other way around?
Amazon and Spotify are selling access to his band's music at a pre-agreed rate according to their licences. If he wants "generosity", maybe he needs to renegotiate the contract or at least look at their business relationship. His label's responsibility, perhaps, not of those who sell his product.
Perhaps the quotes are confused out of context and he actually means that those people should be coming up with new ways to make music profitable. But, why? Surely he has the money and connections to get a new company set up with the best and brightest to do this?
His comments make no sense no matter which way you take them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Did he formerly represent Metallica?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Obviously U2, and thus Paul McGuiness, would make way more money if all the tech companies out there somehow put an end to piracy. And since they refuse to stop piracy they should just give money to artists b/c...well....piracy....*hand wave*.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No but they DO make sense if you make one assumption: Paul McGuinness is not Irish. He's Canadian.
It will come as a shock to many, I'm sure, but it's true. Early in the 1940's, McGuiness' parents, who then had the surname "Abootman" before later changing it, then expecting the birth of what would be their first born son, fled Nova Scotia under fire due to his parents' defense of social platforms for Inuit tribes in the northern part of the country. This was detested by conservative leaders that believed oil reserves could be found in the area. Long story short, Paul's father was a civil rights activist and big oil, at that time largely a Rockefeller operation, put a price on his head.
In any case, Paul was born en route to Ireland via a ship embarking from Quebec. While his parents raised him to blend in with his Irish surroundings, including the name change to "Abootman", he was schooled at home in the traditions of his parents homeland of Canada.
In fact, this story serves as perhaps the best evidence that this well kept secret is true! I mean, just look at the quote:
"I really wish those geniuses who bring us Google, Facebook, Amazon and Spotify would get their act together. It's not the downloading that's the problem. It's a bit of ingenuity and generosity that's required from the people who are making money from the internet."
Do you not understand what he's SAYING?!!??
He's saying he wants "More money". And when people are asking where that money should come from, he's exclaiming, "The internet makes a lot of money. Give us some of that money!"
Canadian, for sure....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One is the lonliest number.
*shakes head
Welp, time to share the love of my music collection, since I'm not doing enough.
Anyone want the entire album Joshua Tree? It's old, but still great.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So he wants everyone to be generous to him but he doesn't want to be generous to anyone else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now there's a headline
"The world's richest musicians are not quite rich enough," states manager Paul McGuiness. "More importantly, I'm not rich enough." Recent 360 concerts have ended with Paul passing the hat for jet fuel money. The band members have been forced to get by on a per diem of $[insert unimaginable amount here].
When pressed for further details as to exactly why the internet in general owes Paul McGuiness (and by extension, U2) more money, McGuiness stated: "Because fuck you, that's why," before disappearing into a handpainted 767 filled to the ceiling with Cristal and potatoes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Now there's a headline
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Now there's a headline
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
.... This month he was hoping to have a gold-plated shark tank bar installed right next to the pool, but thanks to people downloading music for free, he must now wait a few months before he can afford it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chinese control is always the answer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who are all those damn kids? Get off my lawn!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the lion tamer has you beat, Mike...
"World's Richest Band Seeks Handout" is actually a much better title and the only way to really make any sense of the comments coming from U2's manager.
This guy flat out says that piracy isn't the problem, as it would seem that he has finally realized that looking for money from pirates is not a good business model. Instead he turns his attention to siphoning someone else's revenue stream, and Why ??? GENEROSITY!!!!!
Ok time for a huge WTF?????
Now I have to go read the original article, because this guy can't really be THAT dense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sure does make a whole lot of sense now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I change the channel when they play U2 on the radio, I would not give them the time of day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't like the cut of their jib.
If I wanted to listen to old men sing love songs, I'd go to my local.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not a Single Copyright Defender?
Oh, right. This totally underminds their cause....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That used to be true, but has since changed. He no longer makes that large a %.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A few thoughts...
2. You reap what you sow. You want to be stingy with others, expect them to be just as stingy with you.
3. Suing your customers and potential customers is an excellent way to lose them. For years the RIAA and the labels have been suing people for downloading and sharing their music, sometimes for outrageous amounts (one individual,$millions for actual damages probably less than $50), so paranoid that someone else besides them might get some benefit from their works without their profiteering from it. Not only that, they want outrageous prices for their music, and then they wonder why their sales are tanking? Go figure.
A Confucius type saying these people might want to heed:
"He who screw customers soon have no customers to screw."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]