Guy Who Did Mike Tyson's Tattoo Sues Warner Bros. For Copyright Infringement

Scientists Finally Tackle The Age Old 'That's What She Said' Problem

from the it-was-hard-and-it-took-forever dept

Fri, Apr 29th 2011 5:28pm — Mike Masnick

Forget the traveling salesman problem or p=np, some computer scientists have finally tackled the really big challenge for computers: teaching them how to understand the innuendo and double entendres necessary to make a "that's what she said" joke. Yes, all other computer science pale in comparison, so kudos to Chloe Kiddon and Yuriy Brun for tackling such a difficult challenge:

Automating this process means identifying sentences that contain potential euphemisms and follow a particular structure - a "hard natural language understanding problem", say the researchers. Kiddon and Brun began by analysing two different bodies of text - one containing 1.5 million erotic sentences, and another with 57,000 from standard literature.

They then evaluated nouns, adjectives and verbs with a "sexiness" function to determine whether a sentence is a potential TWSS. Examples of nouns with a high sexiness function are "rod" and "meat", while raunchy adjectives are "hot" and "wet".

Their automated system, known as Double Entendre via Noun Transfer or DEviaNT, rates sentences for their TWSS potential by looking for particular elements such as nouns that can be interpreted in multiple ways. The researchers trained DEviaNT by gathering jokes from twssstories.com and non-TWSS text from sites such as wikiquote.org.

Apparently, the system is about 70% accurate so far, but they believe they can get it up to 99.5% accuracy before too long.

I'm sorry, Watson, but this may be the biggest computing/artificial intelligence story of the year. And, already, the race is on to come up with the appropriate jokes. My favorite so far was this quote for the researchers on this project: "It was hard and it took forever."

Filed Under: computers, double entendre, jokes, that's what she said

20 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Mr. Smarta**, 29 Apr 2011 @ 5:41pm

Failed ones?
Another trick would be to identify ones where someone might say "That's what she said." but there's absolutely no innuendo. Anyone might just stare back with a wrinkled forehead saying "What...? That makes no sense". I wonder how the program would react.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- xenomancer (profile), 29 Apr 2011 @ 6:15pm
  
  Re: Failed ones?
  That's what he said.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Prashanth (profile), 29 Apr 2011 @ 7:21pm
  
  Re: Failed ones?
  http://xkcd.com/559/
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Apr 2011 @ 6:30pm

"I'm sorry, Watson, but this may be the biggest computing/artificial intelligence story of the year."

That's what she said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
justok (profile), 29 Apr 2011 @ 7:12pm

I can't do that Dave. THAT's what she said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
kyle clements (profile), 29 Apr 2011 @ 8:12pm

Even though this story seems kind of silly on the surface, it wouldn't surprize me if this was the kind of work that leads to the true revolutionary breakthroughs in AI research.

I can't even imagine where to begin teaching a machine to recognize euphemisms, innuendo, allusions and metaphors.

Soon, we will be able to automate the production of great art and literature, freeing up a lot of time for us to hang out with the sentient robots and make dirty jokes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Apr 2011 @ 8:25pm

You guys think innuendo is all about "noun transfer"?

Better luck next time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- testcore (profile), 29 Apr 2011 @ 9:41pm
  
  Re:
  "Better luck next time"... I bet you hear her say that all the time!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 29 Apr 2011 @ 11:08pm
  
  Re:
  In-your-endo.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 29 Apr 2011 @ 9:30pm

�Innuendo�
Fnarr-fnarr...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Liz, 29 Apr 2011 @ 10:23pm

I wonder what a "sexy function" would look like in a line of code.

var sexy = lulz;

function findfunny(sexy)

if (findfunny == sexy)

alert("That's what she said!");

else if (findfunny /= sexy)

alert("facepalm.jpg");
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Apr 2011 @ 11:18pm
  
  Re:
  There's a bug in your code. 'Findfunny' is undefined in the evaluation of the conditional... and that's what she said.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - ComputerAddict (profile), 2 May 2011 @ 5:43am
    
    Re: Re:
    Its not undefined, Its just going to pull some random value left over in memory from some other app essentially making it if( math.random() == sexy ) which will probably be just about as accurate as the actual program.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Josh, 30 Apr 2011 @ 12:30am

While impressive, this sort of AI is imitative rather than innovative. Imagine if the resources it pulled from (which were created by humans) weren't there or if there were no immediate pattern it could "learn" from. This isn't an understanding of innuendo, it's an understanding of a particular pattern. Humans don't need to be taught how to appreciate a TWSS joke by listening to a bunch of other TWSS jokes first. If they did, the jokes would have never been spawned (chicken vs. egg conundrum). This is an example of "studying for the Turing Test" rather than creating an AI that by its nature is able to pass the Turing Test, not that the former isn't still an achievement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Apr 2011 @ 3:58am

Not so fast. (This is too easy!)
This release was obviously premature.

I never thought you would announce this to the whole world.

I saw this yesterday but didn't think much of it.

You are way off the mark.

You are so far off it hurts.

Do you think I'm done yet?

You're working so hard at this -- it's so funny, it's almost touching!

What else do you think you can do with this little achievement?

You're looking in the wrong place.

What you're calling a "function" is way too mechanical.

Don't force it.

I'm not really done, but let's just leave it there for a while.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NullOp, 30 Apr 2011 @ 6:11am

What?
Is this really something that needs investigating? What do you think will come of it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dave Parker, 30 Apr 2011 @ 7:51am

OK
That article was long and hard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Apr 2011 @ 11:33am

I for one welcome our "that's what she said" responding terminator overlords!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gene Cavanaugh, 30 Apr 2011 @ 12:20pm

Double entendres and computers
After some really excellent analyses (such as the ridiculous and progress-inhibiting class action law suits), you really blew it on this one.

There are very few things more important than providing a means for understanding subtleties in computers. Otherwise, when our (potential) help-mates encounter "I wish I were dead" from a teenager with a history test, the "help" provided will be a call to 911!

This is important stuff. I am amazed you don't see it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 3 May 2011 @ 7:07pm

At the very least Congress can embed the system into cellphones and finally have a sure fire way to ruin sexting for teenagers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]