The Stupidity Of 'You Must Be A Criminal' Copyright Taxes: The SD Card Edition
from the math-and-moore's-law dept
For years, we've discussed the various attempts up in Canada for the CPCC -- the Canadian Private Copying Collective -- to put its "you must be a criminal" tax on the iPod and on your ISP. Both efforts have failed, and now it appears they're just trying totally random stuff just for the hell of it. Howard Knopf explains that the CPCC's latest proposal includes a tax on memory cards:50� for each electronic memory card with 1 gigabyte of memory or less, $1.00 for each electronic memory card with more than one gigabyte of memory but less than 8 gigabytes of memory, and $3.00 for each electronic memory card with 8 gigabytes of memory or more.What does this have to do with music? No one seems to know. The CPCC seems to be arguing that such cards are regularly used for making copies of music, but that's ridiculous. Perhaps some are using memory cards for such things, but it seems unlikely that it's a large percentage of such cards. They're regularly used in digital cameras and phones, but those have little to do with music most of the time.
The rates are also flat out ridiculous. We've already discussed how the levy in Canada represents around 90% of the cost of a CD-R in some cases. While this isn't quite that bad, it's starting out high, and the rates are static so it's only going to get worse. As Michael Geist explains:
The financial impact of the levy would be significant. A 2GB SD card currently sells for about $6.00 and this would add an additional dollar or almost 15% to the cost. Given that the levy would remain static (or even increase) but the costs of SD cards are dropping by roughly 30% annually, the percentage of levy in the overall cost would likely gradually increase over time. Moreover, music plays a small role in the use of memory cards. A recent report indicates that digital cameras are the primary market for SD cards with smartphones the second biggest (and fastest growing) market. Music is a small part of the equation, yet the CPCC is demanding payment for every memory card sold in Canada regardless of its intended or actual use.Another way to put it in perspective is via Knopf's original post, in which he notes that this is actually the second time the CPCC has tried this, and the last time around they wanted $0.008 per megabyte, and he does the math on that:
On today's typical 16 GB card that sells for about $30 or less, that would be a "tax" of $128 -- or about 400% -- which shows the CPCC's foresight and the application of Moore's Law.It's really quite astounding how little the legacy recording industry seems to understand technology and the advance of progress at times. A tax like this is massively damaging to their own interests in the long run, but they just don't seem to recognize it. In the meantime, as ridiculous as this is, Knopf notes that it still means there's going to be a lot of wasted money fighting over this:
Unfortunately, the way the Copyright Board works, it seems inevitable that one or more parties are going to have to spend a lot of money to convince the Board not to impose this levy -- or "tax" as most will call it. The CPCC will spend a lot of money -- which it has from undistributed levies -- to line up its usual expensive experts to provide evidence of its entitlement to this "tax". One or more parties will have to provide evidence and experts at great expense to refute this -- even though it seems so obviously wrong. But that's the way the Copyright Board mechanism works in this and other instances where a collective is entitled to file a proposed tariff.It's really quite stunning the sense of entitlement the industry feels here, that it can simply put a massive tax on a form of memory that is rarely used for music. Though, if it passes, and musicians really want to make some money, they might be better off getting jobs at Best Buy and pushing people to buy SD cards.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Tax Ears
Human ears, are the obvious place to start, but lets not forget the the horses who have been caught listening to pirate music. http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090327/1113014276.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tax Ears
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Tax Ears
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Tax Ears
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tax Ears
One of the final "Analog Holes" to be plugged will be ears, along with eyes, of course.
Once everyone has their surgically-implanted, government-mandated from birth Cochlear and Retinal CCD Implants , all electronic sound and image translation will be DRM encrypted before being sent to your brain. Without pre-purchasing the proper licensing rights, you won't be even able to hear yourself fart, nor see the expression of disgust on the faces of the persons trapped in the elevator with you.
Woe to the day when those DRM licensing servers go down, for that day everyone will be deaf and blind, but at least you'll still be able to smell... until the day they take that sense away through electronic means too.
I bet Disney already has a patent on this type of technology too.
"When analog is outlawed, only outlaws will have organic eyes and ears."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tax Ears
Or the music companies could start releasing hard wired SD cards with the music on them in full lossless digital format.they could call them MD's.would it not be easy to go buy an album, pull out the Sd card and place it into your smartphone and listen to it right there. or into you car stereo(as most after markets are coming with sd slots now).Theres even a right protect notch to prevent over writing. the price of SD cards now should warrant this type of media change. read times on cards are getting faster than disc spin it is only smart to move media to SD locked cards. "lets watch a movie, how about Avatar in ultra HD? OK!" *James inserts SD card into TV and watches movie, instantly. no extra player. no discs. no load time.
You know there is no mention of memory sticks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems easy enough...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Seems easy enough...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Seems easy enough...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Seems easy enough...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In other news
CPCC is noticeably upset with this response. "The tax was suppose to give us free money, not give them a reason to pirate more. Don't they know they're costing me my six figure bonus." the head of the CPCC said in an interview.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: In other news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: In other news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: In other news
If I pay a tax to defray the "lost revenue" of music copied onto SD cards, you bet your ass I'll copy music.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: In other news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: In other news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In other news
If that's not encouragement to jump onto a P2P program and start downloading, I don't know what is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In other news
There's a lot of great info here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_sharing_in_Canada
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In other news
If you actually read the law about private copying, it's quite clear that all forms of distribution are outlawed. Technically I guess it could be grey whether or not it is only the person doing the sharing who is breaking the law and not the receiver.
"[The private copying exemption] does not apply if the act described in that subsection is done for the purpose of doing any of the following [...]
(b) distributing, whether or not for the purpose of trade;
(c) communicating to the public by telecommunication; or
Meh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In other news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In other news
As the article you provided mentions, the ruling was overturned for the sole purpose of preventing receiving from being legal, which to me makes it pretty clear that it isn't.
It's a meh issue because the only reason they haven't resolved this is because they want to make the reforms seem more important than they really are and also because at the article you linked to mentions the police have basically said they have more important things to do with their time anyway, regarless of the technical legality.
Also, it takes 2 to tango, and the sources are the real problem anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In other news
That does not represent a loss of revenue. It is not theft. It is not piracy.
So why are you taxing my SD card again? Or my blank CD for that matter?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In other news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In other news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: In other news
When people know that they are pre-paying a speed tax on every drop of gas they buy, that will surely keep them driving at reasonable speeds, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: In other news
> that because we have this tax it must mean we are actually allowed
> to copy music we don't own.
I can't imagine why Canadians *wouldn't* think that. What's the tax for, after all? It's supposedly to reimburse the industry due to lost sales from people using the media that's taxed. If that's the case, then why wouldn't the people who pay the tax be justified in copying the music?
Otherwise, it essentially *is* just free money that a bunch of corporations got just because they asked for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: In other news
I guess it's a bit like taxing illegal drugs...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Canadian Private Copying Collective?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
By their logic there should be a tax for everything -
Stealing Movies Tax
Stealing Games Tax
Stealing News Tax
Stealing eBook Tax
Stealing AudioBook Tax
Stealing TV Show Tax
Stealing Pictures Tax
How is it possible that politicians approve this kind of crap?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Take it further
Stealing Laptops Tax
Stealing Mobile Phones Tax
Stealing Cars Tax
Since the tax revenus on the stolen digital goods doesn't end up in the hands of the victims (eg, artists), neither should the tax revenue for stolen physical goods.
Instead the tax revenue can go into continuing education campaigns to teach people that it's bad to steal Laptops, Mobile Phones and Cars. (But it's not bad to steal jewelry since there is not yet a tax levy on stealing jewelry.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Take it further
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Take it further
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'd say $1.20 on each $1 sounds fair (I'll need the 20� for my overhead expenses.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bu, bu, but . . .
er, um, I meant to say:
think of the poor artists!
This levy is going to pay the artists right? The RIAA and its members are all about protecting the artists aren't they?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bu, bu, but . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bu, bu, but . . .
I seriously doubt they'll put any of that money into any of my pockets.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We need a tax on cash...
Since honest people pay for everything electronically or with checks; everyone else must be doing secretive things with their cash. We must stop these underworld cash activities at any cost. Anyone who complains must have something to hide.
Therefore, small bills should get a small tax, and bigger bills should get a bigger tax. 1% of tax proceeds to be shared with honest people, prorated on their level of honesty.
The other 99% will be rolled forward into ongoing education, lobbying, legal fees and other professional costs of this important new tax.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We need a tax on cash...
The IRS for example. All income could be properly taxed.
The police for example. All transactions would be recorded and subject to scrutiny. (Just how did you get that house and swimming pool again?)
OTOH, it would be one of the most powerful means of repressive control ever imagined.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: We need a tax on cash...
Politicians.....
Imagine the difficulty hiding the bribes...er special interest funding in a cashless society...
Sure most of it is 'imaginary' incentives and not direct cash payments, but there is enough cash going thru political lobbying channels to fund a couple third world countries for the next decade. And I'm not making these things up, I'm sure I saw a study from the BSA (BullShitAcademy of Statical review) that supports these statements.
/sarcasm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We need a tax on cash...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
(Naturally, the reason why taxes aren't thrown around willy-nilly is because taxation is one of the few things that can lose you elections)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just make it an income tax
Actually, I say lets freeze their bank accounts and kick them out of the country. Ship them off to Africa. Then, we take their frozen bank accounts and use that money to ship some poor Africans over here.
It's win-win. We help some people while taking out the trash.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bands Sell Music on USB Sticks
So, not only is this hurting the consumer...it is hurting the very industry they say they are protecting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Really? REALLY?!!
shows that electronic memory cards are ordinarily used by Canadians to copy music. Consequently,
the CPCC has requested that a levy be applied to these cards."
http://cpcc.ca/english/pdf/CPCC_2012-2013_Tariff_Press_Release_May_16_2011_FINAL.pdf
W hat utter bullshit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
16% of 18%...
"...survey of 1000 individual Canadians".
"18% of Canadians surveyed had copied something onto electronic memory cards and that music represented 16% of the content they copied onto such cards."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 16% of 18%...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: 16% of 18%...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 16% of 18%...
whats all that aboot?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Any court cases on this yet?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blank cassettes - Record music to them - tax
Blank CD's - Record music to them - tax
Blank SD cards - Record music to them - tax
Therefore:
Blank hard disk drive - Record music to it - tax
Roll of foil - Record music to it - tax
Candle wax - Record music to it - tax
Blank paper - Write/print music on it - tax
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The "levee or tariff" is "extra" on top of the HST...or maybe before it, which means we'd pay more in HST as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
It should be HSTS:
Harmonized Sales Tax Sucks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wish the US would do that...
BTW, I don't pirate today, but I have stated here before, if I get charged any kind of tax/license fee like this on media or broadband connections, I will start pirating like the world has never seen before.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clarification
The law that created the CPCC says that the levy shall apply to all "media" that are "normally" used for the purposes of recording audio.
"Normally" in this context does not mean "typically" or "usually", just that the use would be considered "normal". This is why DVDs aren't subject to this levy - although they could record audio just as easily, this isn't a "normal" use. There aren't many audio-only DVD devices on the market.
Under this rule, media cards and hard drives would absolutely qualify for the levy, and almost did. It took a court ruling to determine that these were in fact "devices", not "media", and therefore didn't qualify for the levy.
Finally, why only audio? Why not video? Because the entire idea was dreamed up by executives and parliamentarians who wanted to compensate the music labels for all those mix tapes and home-burned CDs. Napster wouldn't hit it big for another 4 or 5 years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Since I'm paying money to be a "criminal", that should actually give me the right to *be* a criminal.
In other words, paying that $1 levy on an SD card should give me the right, free from all legal ramifications, of copying as much music as I like.
I'd gladly pay a buck for that :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hungarian storage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]